Openmind
Well-Known Member
The question is NOT whether women in the plan take it or do not (that's up to them) its whether the rest in the equation are forced to subsidize what is against their faith.
Were you aware that Viagra is indicated for matters other than the obvious ? Might just explain the reference in our snip regarding its use.
and its not just for men
And NO ONE is asking anyone, but the insurance industry (who is more than happy to do it, since it means more profit for them in the long run trough a decrease in coverage for pregnant women and delivery).
In fact, if MONEY is your concern, why don't you worry about people having to pay MORE for all the children that SOME people want to bring into this world EVEN if they are not wanted by the parents?
Do you realize that, in smaller, or middle size corporations, the NUMBER of women who are pregnant in any one year influences the rate of the health care premium the company (and their employees through their co-pay) have to pay? Do you realize that, even the number of women in child bearing age in one corporation can increase the premium for everyone in that corporation?
What about all the people who DO NOT WANT more children in this already over-populated world? Can they say "it is against my code of ethics and against my moral to pay for more children to be born, when so many children are left to starve all over the world, even in our inner city neighborhoods"?
And if you think that 0ne out of 100 Viagra pills goes to someone who REALLY need it for a REAL medical reason (other than boosting one's male ego and feeling "like a man" again!), why are you ignoring the MANY MORE women (even young girls) who NEED birth control pills for MEDICAL reason. . . who without the hormones in the birth control pills would spend 2 to 5 days each month incapacitated by horrible cramps and heavy bleeding?
Once again, you are ONLY considering YOUR side of the issue. . .and you pretend that I do not understand the issue? At least, I see it in its entirety. . while you are stuck in your partisan hate for that ONE man who is trying to do the best he can to help women. . .especially poor women, for whom 30$ a month means two or three meals for her and her kids!
You will NEVER recognize ANY point I make as valid. . .and you will come answer this comment with an arrogant: "that's because you fail to make your point!"
How biased and hypocritical can anyone be? If I took the same approach as our dear General, I would ask you to ANSWER each one of the question and to justify with REASON why I am wrong.
But it would be wasting my time, because you do not have the fortitude to face that, even if you disagree with most of my view, even if you are convinced that I am wrong 99% of the time, YOU WILL NOT RECOGNIZE even that 1% that you KNOW is correct.