Agnapostate
Well-Known Member
That was the chief focus of what I said. Can we assume that withdrawal from the NPT will excuse the Iranian administration from this criticism, then?
-
Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum
A Defiant Iran Vows to Build Nuclear Plants
- Thread starter PLC1
- Start date
That was the chief focus of what I said. Can we assume that withdrawal from the NPT will excuse the Iranian administration from this criticism, then?
Werbung:
That was the chief focus of what I said. Can we assume that withdrawal from the NPT will excuse the Iranian administration from this criticism, then?
Not really, because they would still stand in violation of numerous legally binding Security Council Resolutions.
Well it depends on how you want to conduct a strike. For example, Israel has the GBU-28 (Bunker Buster) and they have been reported to conduct training scenarios where they use that to create an entry for a tactical nuclear weapon.
It also depends on what site you want to hit, and how far underground these sites actually are. In certain scenarios, the targets would not even be buried all that deeply, if at all.
Agnapostate
Well-Known Member
So if violation of UN resolutions is a high crime, why isn't the state whose administration actually developed a nuclear arsenal in concealment from international authorities and has violated numerous resolutions since in the hot seat? :\
Werbung:
It is not just a violation of UN resolutions... it is a violation of Security Council Resolutions. I imagine you are talking about Israel, and I am not aware (nor do I think there are) any UNSC Resolutions calling for Israel to suspend enrichment or anything of that sort.
