UN: Credible evidence Iran working on nuke weapons

steveox

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Messages
7,499
Location
Way Down South
VIENNA (AP) — The U.N. nuclear agency said Friday it is "increasingly concerned" about a stream of intelligence suggesting that Iran continues to work secretly on developing a nuclear payload for a missile and other components of a nuclear weapons program.

In its report, the International Atomic Energy Agency said "many member states" are providing evidence for that assessment, describing the information it is receiving as credible, "extensive and comprehensive."

The restricted 9-page report was made available Friday to The Associated Press, shortly after being shared internally with the 35 IAEA member nations and the U.N. Security Council. It also said Tehran has fulfilled a pledged made earlier this year and started installing equipment to enrich uranium at a new location — an underground bunker that is better protected from air attack than its present enrichment facilities.

Enrichment can produce both nuclear fuel and fissile warhead material, and Tehran — which says it wants only to produce fuel with the technology — is under four sets of U.N. Security Council sanctions for refusing to freeze enrichment, which it says it needs for fuel only.

It also denies secretly experimenting with a nuclear weapons program and has blocked a four-year attempt by the IAEA to follow up on intelligence that it secretly designed blueprints linked to a nuclear payload on a missile, experimented with exploding a nuclear charge, and conducted work on other components of a weapons program.

http://news.yahoo.com/un-credible-evidence-iran-working-nuke-weapons-153544271.html

Obama wont Attack. Hes too weak and chicken to order a military strike. Remember how Jimmy Carter was weak on handling IRAN.
 
Werbung:

ProudLefty

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2011
Messages
585
Remember how Carter was weak on Iran?

Yeah. I remember. I remember a candidate for the presidency of the US who had a secret agreement with Iran to hold the hostages in captivity until Inauguration Day, so he could appear strong and effective. I have often wondered what that agreement cost us, and I have seriously wondered if that action was treason by a US citizen.

I also remember Ollie North and what he did and that he took a fall for his President.

By the way, Carter was not weak on Iran. He did go after the hostages, and the mistakes he made were very much in the mind of Barack Obama when Obama killed bin Laden.
 

steveox

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Messages
7,499
Location
Way Down South
Then why the hostages were released when Reagan took the oath of office? Ill tell you why. The Arabs were scared **** when a Republican named Ronald Reagan took over. They know the Republicans can fight back. Remember Reagan bombed Tripoli and Killed Gaddafi Adopted son? See you just dont mess with Republicans when theryre in Charge. Both Bushswent after Saddam. What did Clinton do going after terrorist? Clinton had Bin Laden right in front of him but did not do his job by signing the executive order to kill Bin Laden. If he would done his job 9/11 wouldnt have taken place. If Michele Bachman Became president this is what she would do to IRAN.
MushroomCloud.jpg
]
 
Werbung:

ProudLefty

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2011
Messages
585
Then why the hostages were released when Reagan took the oath of office? Ill tell you why. The Arabs were scared **** when a Republican named Ronald Reagan took over. They know the Republicans can fight back. Remember Reagan bombed Tripoli and Killed Gaddafi Adopted son? See you just dont mess with Republicans when theryre in Charge. Both Bushswent after Saddam. What did Clinton do going after terrorist? Clinton had Bin Laden right in front of him but did not do his job by signing the executive order to kill Bin Laden. If he would done his job 9/11 wouldnt have taken place. If Michele Bachman Became president this is what she would do to IRAN.
MushroomCloud.jpg
]
No. The fcts are clear and the evidence substantial. Ronald Reagan, as a candidate for President of the USA, made a secret agreement with the Iranians. The Iranians were to keep the hostages until Inauguration Day, and then release them, In return, Reagan would pay.... who knows, but the price we paid was substantial. Ollie North knows the details.
 
Top