Activist judges on the SCOTUS do their master's bidding

Stalin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
3,791
One of the defining features of the german dictatorship was the cowardice of the judges who folded almost without exception..

"The courts, judges, lawyers, and legal theorists all joined in the Nazi plan and implemented it with vigor. In August 1934, German judges began taking an oath to follow Hitler, not the country’s constitution. All state officials, including judges, previously took the following oath: “I swear loyalty to the Constitution, obedience to the law, and conscientious fulfillment of the duties of my office, so help me God.”[24] The new version provided: “I swear loyalty to the Führer of the German Reich and people, Adolf Hitler, obedience to the law, and conscientious fulfillment of the duties of my office, so help me God.”[25]

No German judge refused to take the revised oath.[26] Martin Gauger, a prosecutor at the state court in Wuppertal, Germany, appears to be the only public lawyer to resign his office rather than swear the required oath. As Gauger explained in a letter to his brother: “I could not swear an unlimited oath of loyalty and obedience to a man who is bound neither by the law nor the traditions of justice.”[27]"


Same in the US where a majority of the Supreme court who did not even have to fold - they are complete lickspittle appointees of the charismatic madman who has lied and bullied his way into power.

"The U.S. Supreme Court delivered a major victory to President Trump on Monday, allowing the administration to continue deporting what it says are Venezuelan gang members. The vote was 5-to-4, with conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett joining the three liberals in dissent.

At issue in the case was the 1798 Alien Enemies Act, a controversial law invoked only three times in U.S. history, always during wartime, which allows for the detention and deportation of foreign nationals from countries actively invading the United States. The Trump administration argued that the law applied to Venezuelan gang members who were deemed to be invading the nation.

more on this complete travesty of justice at https://www.npr.org/2025/04/07/nx-s1-5345601/supreme-court-alien-enemies-act

comrade stalin
moscow
 
Werbung:
I wouldn't call it a major victory. The fact that "Can we deport ILLEGAL ALIENS" has to even go to the supreme court means the ACTIVIST judges aren't the ones on the SC
This thread fails HARD
The exact reason Trump stacked the SC was to put ACTIVIST JUDGES in their places.
LOL
 
Trump stacked the SC

So you admit that biased judges were chosen. Extra LOL with cheese on top.

In our country, judges are supposed to be impartial.

We have a word for judges who do big money's whim.

Corrupt.

The prosecution rests.

This inadequate reply fails, double, nay triple hard

Comrade Stalin
Not in a hopelessly governed and corrupt country
 
So you admit that biased judges were chosen. Extra LOL with cheese on top.

In our country, judges are supposed to be impartial.

We have a word for judges who do big money's whim.

Corrupt.

The prosecution rests.

This inadequate reply fails, double, nay triple hard

Comrade Stalin
Not in a hopelessly governed and corrupt country

I never said the word "bias" or the word "admit"
You think you are slick with your attempted spin but you suck at it.
IMO they are not biased enough.
His picks have ruled in favor with the left before, just like Amy (forget her last name) did for the recent decision.
You are also complaining about what activist circuit judges are doing on the left. Remember, this should have NEVER even went to the SC in the first place.
Now your crappy activist judges can go do something better with their time, like spray paint some Teslas or whatever you dipshits do on your spare time
THREAD FAIL MY MAN
Try harder next time, do some research, try to display an education level higher than a 5th grader
Cheers!
 
Werbung:
I never said the word "bias" or the word "admit"
You think you are slick with your attempted spin but you suck at it.
IMO they are not biased enough.
His picks have ruled in favor with the left before, just like Amy (forget her last name) did for the recent decision.
You are also complaining about what activist circuit judges are doing on the left. Remember, this should have NEVER even went to the SC in the first place.
Now your crappy activist judges can go do something better with their time, like spray paint some Teslas or whatever you dipshits do on your spare time
THREAD FAIL MY MAN
Try harder next time, do some research, try to display an education level higher than a 5th grader
Cheers!

Not biased enough???

Are you kidding? Why have them at all then?
 
Back
Top