As long as voting machine manufacturers can alter voting numbers in an election and examinations of their machines afterwards is forbidden by law, then the voting machine manufacturers can control the election just as Putin's pals control elections in Russia.if your argument is that we don't know the "true' results of ANY election, including trump's in 2016, well that's a different one.
I won't argue that it is theoretically possible, along with the possibility that space aliens are controlling our minds. duh
Democrats were counting on routine election fraud to steal the 2016 win for Hillary as the fraud had done in so many prior elections, but Trump's massive numbers totally caught them by surprise. They did not make the same mistake in 2020 but their voting fraud numbers had to break all previous voting numbers as massive late-night ballots lacking the required verification paperwork were rushed into key democrat precincts by the hundreds of thousands, forcing vote counters to extend the counting period into days and weeks following the election instead of the normal one day only counting period.Same old shit. Everything is stacked against the godbothering right. Those bloody communists again. Was it them that awarded Trump the 2016 and you never belated a word. How coincidental you hypocrite.
Can? LolAs long as voting machine manufacturers can alter voting numbers in an election and examinations of their machines afterwards is forbidden by law, then the voting machine manufacturers can control the election just as Putin's pals control elections in Russia.
The election fraud you morons can't prove lolDemocrats were counting on routine election fraud to steal the 2016 win for Hillary as the fraud had done in so many prior elections, but Trump's massive numbers totally caught them by surprise. They did not make the same mistake in 2020 but their voting fraud numbers had to break all previous voting numbers as massive late-night ballots lacking the required verification paperwork were rushed into key democrat precincts by the hundreds of thousands, forcing vote counters to extend the counting period into days and weeks following the election instead of the normal one day only counting period.
No judge found fraud who never concerned himself about the missing ballots, the missing voting machine logs, the missing signature verification records, the missing chain of custody documents, and more.The election fraud you morons can't prove lol
Why didn't a single judge Agee with you?
your missing the point all together lug nut.You didn't read it. It appears the money goes to the states including red ones.
No judge found fraud who never concerned himself about the missing ballots, the missing voting machine logs, the missing signature verification records, the missing chain of custody documents, and more.
Are you suggesting that no judge found fraud because no pertinent evidence was presented to them? You may be right about that.the judges concerned themselves with everything presented to them.
you morons had no credible evidence which is why you lost every court case.
its rare to be so stupid and inept to lose every case, but you morons did it!
Not might be right. He is right.Are you suggesting that no judge found fraud because no pertinent evidence was presented to them? You may be right about that.
As long as voting machine manufacturers can alter voting numbers in an election and examinations of their machines afterwards is forbidden by law, then the voting machine manufacturers can control the election just as Putin's pals control elections in Russia.
Are you suggesting that no judge found fraud because no pertinent evidence was presented to them? You may be right about that.
The fact that the plaintiff lost the case does not prove the judge examined all the evidence of the case and outside the case and declared that the evidence proved no fraud anywhere took place.Not might be right. He is right.
Their briefs contained nothing to further the case. It was all piss and wind and lies. Get over it.
Election fraud can involve changing vote totals in ways that appear no fraud occurred, until the inner workings of the machine or methods are examined more closely.its a shame that hand counts of physical ballots match machine totals, meaning no fraud occured.
except in your "mind" lol
sure, it "can". its a shame you morons have zero credible proof after years of looking. lol.Election fraud can involve changing vote totals in ways that appear no fraud occurred, until the inner workings of the machine or methods are examined more closely.
You've lost it completely.The fact that the plaintiff lost the case does not prove the judge examined all the evidence of the case and outside the case and declared that the evidence proved no fraud anywhere took place.
