Dang global l warming

Werbung:
Another ill-educated non-scientist who cannot tell the difference between climate and weather

introducing the polar vortex


maybe if you were better educated, you would not make such ignorant comments


comrade stalin
 
Another ill-educated non-scientist who cannot tell the difference between climate and weather

introducing the polar vortex
you dont get it do you,over your head i see lol


maybe if you were better educated, you would not make such ignorant comments


comrade stalin
 
Another ill-educated non-scientist who cannot tell the difference between climate and weather

introducing the polar vortex


maybe if you were better educated, you would not make such ignorant comments


comrade stalin

So why the name change? Global warming to climate change? So you liars can claim that any unusual weather is caused by this.

We have been told that the earth has been warming for a hundred years so yes it is interesting when we have record snow fall in the state of Florida in 2025.
 
So why the name change? Global warming to climate change? So you liars can claim that any unusual weather is caused by this.

We have been told that the earth has been warming for a hundred years so yes it is interesting when we have record snow fall in the state of Florida in 2025.
If I may please. Global warming is real but how much is due to man and what we can do about it .
First off you hear about convert to solar , great plan love it. $4.5 trillion
According to 2 sources




Converting the entire U.S. power grid to 100 percent renewable energy in the next decade is technologically and logistically attainable, and would cost an estimated $4.5 trillion, according to a recent analysis by the energy research firm Wood Mackenzie.

But you also have the rest of the world and thats expensive but if you really want to combat pollution its what it is
to convert the Earth to solar energy depends on various factors, including the moment of the year and the specific technology used. For example, the distance between Earth and the Sun varies between 0.98 to 1.02 astronomical units (au)1. A global effort to transition to 100 percent renewable energy by 2050 would cost nations $73 trillion .


Now all you have to do is raise 73 trillion dollars and get russia china cuba africa Asia and south America the middle east etc to do the same .

Then comes the tough part we have overpopulated the world and we need to cut back so we will have to issue permits to have kids in order to control out population and energy use..

OK its really a simple fix if you do what I say you then cut back on fertilizers which require oil and are make it able to feed billions .

NOw how much is natural no way to know that for sure. but the earth at one time had semi tropical weather at the poles and many ice ages with many warming periods.

Now heres the kicker no one talking about ,


We are at the end of a ice age so it should be warming up .
 
Yeah, but you cannot even SPELL accurate..
you misspell also egg and you have a phd I made t to the 9 th grade before the grandparents who raised me got sick one died and I had to drop out of school to tend to the farm and get a job.So my education was stopped but I still was learning every day English was not one of the skills i needed.

You dont seem to mind millions of illegals who can not seak english but can not write or read it and your ok filng the nation with them why isthat .
 
Hell, you don't even have to know how to spell, all you have to do is figure out how to use the spellchecker.
 
No one doubts that nuclear weapons. satellite broadcasting and plasma TVs work...100%

The same scientific method that developed these technologies is involved in the development of the climate change hypothesis..

One of the predictions of this hypothesis is the extreme weather currently ravaging the planet.

There is no scientific controversy, despite the bribing of numerous retired physics professors unable to survive
on a meagre pension and various contrarians with an axe to grind.

A good view of these people can be found at https://www.desmog.com/

The "controversy" is a political one bought and paid for by fossil fuel shills and their attack dogs.

The energy business does not support the medieval flat-earth views of our maga acolytes



comrade stalin
mojave deseret
 
No one doubts that nuclear weapons. satellite broadcasting and plasma TVs work...100%

The same scientific method that developed these technologies is involved in the development of the climate change hypothesis..

One of the predictions of this hypothesis is the extreme weather currently ravaging the planet.

There is no scientific controversy, despite the bribing of numerous retired physics professors unable to survive
on a meagre pension and various contrarians with an axe to grind.

A good view of these people can be found at https://www.desmog.com/

The "controversy" is a political one bought and paid for by fossil fuel shills and their attack dogs.

The energy business does not support the medieval flat-earth views of our maga acolytes



comrade stalin
mojave deseret
bEEN INTOTHE CROCDILLA i SEE
 
Scientific method for CC is the same as plasma tvs?

No one doubts that nuclear weapons. satellite broadcasting and plasma TVs work...100%

The same scientific method that developed these technologies is involved in the development of the climate change hypothesis..

Plasmas are obsolete. :rolleyes:
 
Werbung:
Back
Top