http://web.mit.edu/humancostiraq/
Tyr this for starters.
Obviously you won't accept anything that does not support your witless views that you never prove.
The difference between my views and yours is that mine at least can be proved.
See how you lie again? I have consistently asked you for proof on many topics, and you never have it. Just more BS like you did here.
From your article:
While reports of civilian war deaths in 2009 were down to the lowest level since the U.S. invasion nearly seven years ago, they remain significant. Iraq Body Count, the U.K.-based NGO that uses press reports
to count civilians killed by violence, had the number at just under 4,500 for 2009. This number, which does not count what the Multi-National Force labels as insurgents, nor security forces or deaths that result from war but not direct violence, misses whatever is not reported in what remains of English-language news media in Iraq. Even so, nearly 5,000 deaths are more than have been recorded for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in toto or for Northern Ireland's long conflict.
The fresh concerns have to do with the re-emergence of Sunni Arab violence in Anbar and continuing turmoil in Mosul and Kirkuk, much of which appears to be sectarian. Anxiety about U.S. withdrawal is also apparent. The numbers of displaced remain remarkably high. The acquittal by a U.S. judge of gunmen from Blackwater, the American security contractors who apparently murdered 17 civilians, angers Iraqis and has stirred the prime minister to an investigation. As a coalition of churches, Act Alliance, recently put it, "In 2009, the situation has improved, but remains volatile. . . A large majority of people is suffering direct consequences from war
and sectarian violence.
Now, I will again ask you to prove that millions of Iraqis lives have been wrecked by Bush and
hundreds of millions of Americans can now be arrested and imprisoned without trial, tortured etc.
Now, try again you lying fool.
You're absolutely right, what the US did a couple of decades ago is not something to defend. But my question still stands, you said that Bush removed civil liberties. But removing the Taliban from power in Afghanistan, isn't that rather implementing these liberties?
