Expert testimony: Election workers in Georgia committed massive election fraud in 2020 and knew what they were doing

republicans commit fraud too.
your obsession with one party shows you are a hateful hypocrite, and suitable only to be laughed at :)
There is no excuse for republicans committing fraud and no excuse for democrats committing fraud. Democrats lie by attempting to claim their fraud is no worse than republican fraud because the overwhelming massive majority of all crooks over the last hundred years who have been convicted of voting fraud have been democrats, with many of the guilty having been democrat election officials and politicians.

https://www.usnews.com/debate-club/...raud-is-a-proven-election-manipulation-tactic 6-13-12

Sign In
Voter Fraud Is a Proven Election Manipulation Tactic

As the Supreme Court said, vote fraud has been present in our elections throughout our entire history. There are individuals who are willing to take advantage when they see an opportunity to steal an election. We need to be sure that every eligible American is able to vote, but we also need to take the steps necessary to ensure the integrity of our election process.
 
Werbung:
There is no excuse for republicans committing fraud and no excuse for democrats committing fraud. Democrats lie by attempting to claim their fraud is no worse than republican fraud because the overwhelming massive majority of all crooks over the last hundred years who have been convicted of voting fraud have been democrats, with many of the guilty having been democrat election officials and politicians.

https://www.usnews.com/debate-club/...raud-is-a-proven-election-manipulation-tactic 6-13-12

Sign InVoter Fraud Is a Proven Election Manipulation Tactic

As the Supreme Court said, vote fraud has been present in our elections throughout our entire history. There are individuals who are willing to take advantage when they see an opportunity to steal an election. We need to be sure that every eligible American is able to vote, but we also need to take the steps necessary to ensure the integrity of our election process.
You admit it's not a democrat only thing but obsess about dems
You are anti American
 
There is no excuse for republicans committing fraud and no excuse for democrats committing fraud. Democrats lie by attempting to claim their fraud is no worse than republican fraud because the overwhelming massive majority of all crooks over the last hundred years who have been convicted of voting fraud have been democrats, with many of the guilty having been democrat election officials and politicians.

https://www.usnews.com/debate-club/...raud-is-a-proven-election-manipulation-tactic 6-13-12

Sign InVoter Fraud Is a Proven Election Manipulation Tactic

As the Supreme Court said, vote fraud has been present in our elections throughout our entire history. There are individuals who are willing to take advantage when they see an opportunity to steal an election. We need to be sure that every eligible American is able to vote, but we also need to take the steps necessary to ensure the integrity of our election process.
No one is disputing that.
Your hypocrisy started when Trump lost but never uttered a word about the fraud that got him elected.

Here's a bit of news.
The RNC have already established electors in the swing states to not sign off on election results if Trump loses the vote there.
Don't believe it?
Check for yourself.

Then of course let's not forget Trump organising fake electors attempting to overturn the election but that's not election interference is it? Perish the thought. Yet you've been bellowing about election fraud without a sceric of evidence to prove it swung the election.
 
You admit it's not a democrat only thing but obsess about dems
You are anti American
CORRUPTION: Convicted Election Ballot Harvester Gloria Torres Appointed Vice-Mayor in San Luis, Arizona - Geller Report 1-2-24

Former candidate charged with election fraud in case of ‘ghost candidate’ on primary ballot (click2houston.com) 12-11-20
Stolen, rigged and illegitimate: Democrats' long history of objecting to election results - Washington Times 8-21-23

How ‘Landslide Lyndon’ stole the Senate race in 1948 – World Tribune: U.S. Politics and Culture, Geostrategy, China, North Korea, Corporate Watch, Media Watch 11-14-18
Ex-Democrat congressman sentenced to prison for years of voter fraud dating back to 2014, including taking money from judges to commit fraud on their behalf, CNN Politics 9-27-22
Mounting voting fraud evidence raises suspicions over Democrats’ refusal to allow investigations, dailysignal.com 8-24-21
 
No one is disputing that.
Your hypocrisy started when Trump lost but never uttered a word about the fraud that got him elected.

Here's a bit of news.
The RNC have already established electors in the swing states to not sign off on election results if Trump loses the vote there.
Don't believe it?
Check for yourself.

Then of course let's not forget Trump organising fake electors attempting to overturn the election but that's not election interference is it? Perish the thought. Yet you've been bellowing about election fraud without a sceric of evidence to prove it swung the election.
Democrats pushed Congress to certify the election without even seriously examining the massive amount of voter fraud evidence stacked against democrats. Democrats claim there was no evidence of fraud but that is a lie.
 
yes, fraud occurs. duh. by both parties. and have since we had elections. duh
god you post the dumbest things.
 
Democrats pushed Congress to certify the election without even seriously examining the massive amount of voter fraud evidence stacked against democrats. Democrats claim there was no evidence of fraud but that is a lie.

dems "pushed" people to follow the constitutional process. duh.
republicans had months to sue, and did, and lost. duh.
god you are so stupid lol
 
yes, fraud occurs. duh. by both parties. and have since we had elections. duh
god you post the dumbest things.
Only lying or ignorance could motivate anyone to claim the evidence shows equal amounts of fraud on both sides.
 
dems "pushed" people to follow the constitutional process. duh.
republicans had months to sue, and did, and lost. duh.
god you are so stupid lol
Democrats denied the evidence, obstructed investigations, and bullied Congress into certifying the election tainted with massive reports of deliberate Democrat fraud.
 
Democrats pushed Congress to certify the election

That is a lie. It took the same time to certify it as every other election and as the constitution says. You're a liar.

without even seriously examining the massive amount of voter fraud evidence stacked against democrats. Democrats claim there was no evidence of fraud but that is a lie.
I've just proved who was the liar.
 
That is a lie. It took the same time to certify it as every other election and as the constitution says. You're a liar.
Congress rushed to judgment in certifying the election in spite of massive evidence of unrefuted voter fraud. One case alleging lawmaker's refusal to do their duty to investigate allegations of voter fraud went all the way to SCOTUS.

https://amac.us/newsline/society/su...investigate-disputed-electoral-college-votes/ 1-4-23

Supreme Court Dockets Brunson V. Adams Case That Challenges The Failure Of Congress To Investigate Disputed Electoral College Votes

Posted on Wednesday, January 4, 2023|
by Matt Kane

A historic case has been docketed by the United States Supreme Court. Case number 22-380 titled Brunson v. Adams has reached the highest court in the land by a Writ of Certiorari from the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals. The petitioner of the case, Raland J. Brunson, is suing 388 federal officers, including former Vice President Mike Pence, President Joe Biden, and Vice President Kamala Harris, for “violating their oaths of office,” where they swore to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies both foreign and domestic. Brunson claims their refusal to investigate an alleged attack (voter fraud) on the Constitution on January 6th, 2021, violated their oaths they swore just one day prior as they were sworn in as members of the 117th Congress.The case itself is not alleging electoral fraud occurred in the 2020 election. Instead, they cite the 147 members of Congress having their request to investigate (after hundreds of affidavits alleging fraud) denied signals that all other members defied their oath of office. In connection with this Brunson “breach of duty” argument, it should be noted that the last phrases of the House and Senate Oath of Office read “… that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.” The remedy sought by Brunson would result in the removal of all respondents from their current positions and would bar them from ever holding public office ever again.

A significant number of Americans believe the results of the 2020 election were impacted by “unethical activity,” to put it mildly. Those in this camp are told their beliefs have been “debunked.” But in order for something to be “debunked” they must have been proven untrue. However, these allegations were not actually “debunked” but instead ignored or dismissed, which is precisely what this case seeks to address.
 
Last edited:
You think the evidence of fraud could possibly be proved wrong, but nobody has done that yet, even after 4 years of denials of the facts and evidence.
Your logic is flawed. Here: some claims have not been proven wrong for say 2000 years. Means nothing. I told you about falsifiability. I doubt you tried to understand it or google it.

Here is an easier version: opinions are not facts. They cannot be proven right or wrong.

But it doubt you will ever learn.
 
Werbung:
Your logic is flawed. Here: some claims have not been proven wrong for say 2000 years. Means nothing. I told you about falsifiability. I doubt you tried to understand it or google it.

Here is an easier version: opinions are not facts. They cannot be proven right or wrong.

But it doubt you will ever learn.
You cannot dismiss evidence of voting fraud by claiming since it has not been examined in court it becomes as unreal as rumors of alien invasions, for example. The evidence cannot be dismissed as invalid because biased courts, politicians, or pundits simply do not want the evidence examined.
 
Back
Top