which part of your long post proves the origin of covid? nothing? lol.Like I said, if you want to find out where covid started then you will have to do research and not just sit there and cast dispersions on the research others do. Here is more evidence from dozens I have on file:
She’s at the center of the covid lab leak controversy. Now she’s telling her story. | MIT Technology Reviewuses that live in bats. Her NHUNG
February 9, 2022
Not everybody agrees, but the majority of virologists and infectious-disease experts, especially those working directly on the origins question, lean toward that theory, barring the emergence of new evidence that persuades them otherwise. ...
Scientists like David Relman, an expert on microbiology and biosecurity at Stanford University, are dismayed at the way the lab leak theory has been dismissed. He helped organize a group of 18 scientists to sign a letter published in Science last May calling for further investigation of a possible accident. ...
Probing covid-19’s origins will not only help us understand how coronaviruses work but shine a bright light on the human behaviors—including the types of scientific research—that risk causing a pandemic in the future. ...
In 2018, though, 4991 was brought back out again. The Wuhan Institute of Virology had bought a new desktop sequencing machine, which made it much faster and cheaper to get a complete view of a virus’s genomic secrets, and 4991 was among the first batch of samples to be sequenced with the new device. ...
They called it a conspiracy theory. But Alina Chan tweeted life into the idea that the virus came from a lab.
The whistleblowing scientist who advanced the lab-leak theory plans to change her name and disappear, but only after a book deal. ...
Genetic tinkering ...
As the researchers’ collection of bat coronavirus sequences grew—especially after 2012, when they first managed to culture live viruses—they wanted to pinpoint the genetic ingredients that allow those viruses to infect humans, so scientists could develop drugs and vaccines to counter them. ...
Meanwhile, Shi’s team was attempting similar tinkering in her own lab in a project funded by the US National Institutes of Health, which aimed to probe the genetic ingredients that could allow bat viruses to cause SARS-like diseases in humans. ...
Biosafety challenges
Even though none of those chimeric viruses was the source of covid-19, there are still concerns that the biosafety standards in the Wuhan lab might not have been rigorous enough to prevent research activities from causing the pandemic.
Studies involving live viruses and genetic tinkering are inherently risky. Accidents can happen even with the most stringent biosafety precautions in place. ...
The Wuhan institute’s biosafety committees ruled a decade ago that while work with animals must be carried out in BSL-3, molecular and cell-culture work involving bat coronaviruses can be done in BSL-2, albeit in biosafety cabinets with air filtration and under negative pressure to keep viruses inside. ...
This scientist now believes covid started in Wuhan’s wet market. Here’s why. ...
Angela Rasmussen, University of Saskatchewan
Such obstacles are hardly a secret. When the US embassy in Beijing sent a delegation to visit the Wuhan Institute of Virology in early 2018, managers of the institute lamented about them to embassy staff. ...
The newspaper column marked a turning point in the debate over covid-19’s origins, catapulting the lab leak theory into the mainstream. Several mainstream media outlets have used its assertions as evidence that the Wuhan institute has a record of “spotty” or “shoddy” biosafety practice. ...
Some scientists are appalled by what they perceive as misrepresentation of the embassy cables. ...
Politics of mistrust ...
To China experts like Joy Zhang, a sociologist at the University of Kent in Canterbury, UK, who specializes in science governance in China, it’s hard to separate the specific allegations against Shi from the general suspicions of China. “Shi is a victim of the Western mistrust of China and Chinese science,” she says.
Such mistrust of Chinese scientific practices is obvious among some. Filippa Lentzos, a biosecurity expert at King’s College London, told me in February last year that “it’s simply too late” to find out what happened because “everything, for instance, in the Wuhan Institute of Virology freezers would have been cleared out. The data records would have been scrubbed or cleaned up.” She says it’s still her view now. ...
Meanwhile, several Chinese institutions, including the Wuhan Institute of Virology, instructed their scientists—with rare exceptions—not to speak to the press. ...
“I just wanted to put my head down and concentrate on my work,” Shi told me. “I thought the storm would just blow over after some time.”
Some of the Wuhan institute’s behavior has certainly raised red flags. In February 2020, for example, it took its virus databases offline, and they remain unavailable to outsiders—prompting some to suggest that they might contain information critical to covid-19’s origins. ...
Instead of tackling the publicity crisis directly, China has exacerbated mistrust by running obfuscation and disinformation campaigns of its own. ...
Instead of tackling the publicity crisis directly, China has exacerbated mistrust by running obfuscation and disinformation campaigns of its own. ...
Many scientists in the West are dismayed by such obfuscation. Even those who consider the lab leak theory highly unlikely are adamant that this behavior is unacceptable. “If China is lying about this, what else is it lying about?” says one virologist who strongly supports the natural origins theory. ...
Adding fuel to the mistrust, though, is the role of the EcoHealth Alliance’s Daszak. His close ties with Shi’s lab and his role as a member of the WHO mission’s international team are potentially in conflict. ...
Daszak told me in an email that his potential conflicts of interest had been declared to the WHO before he joined the mission team. He says that there is lots of misreporting about him and his work in the media and that he is often not given the chance to respond to accusations. EcoHealth Alliance, he adds, has acted “with scientific integrity and honesty.”
“It’s now over two years since the first efforts to willfully politicize the pandemic origins, and to undermine science and the work that scientists do in often difficult circumstances,” says Daszak. “All of us have lost due to this politicization. When you mix politics with science, you get politics.”
-
Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum
Fauci lied and leftists falsely blamed Trump
- Thread starter mark francis
- Start date
which part of your long post proves the origin of covid? nothing? lol.
Werbung:
Boris Norris
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2022
- Messages
- 11,417
mark francis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 17,679
The problem with proof is that lazy leftists cannot take the time to read truthful reports that list irrefutable facts, evidence, and details. What is clear is that many groups were invested in research that developed the Covid-19 virus, including government officials and agencies, research institutions, pharmaceutical companies, schools, billionaire investors, and more. The one link that ties all of them together is money.
This report is exhaustive, and the facts presented show the immense amount of money, mostly government money, that flowed through those involved in the covid development and treatments.
01 Covid - Funding for coronavirus development.pdf 9-8-2020
September 8-16, 2020
A Timeline of Selected Federal Funding for SARS Coronavirus Over the past two decades, M·CAM has been monitoring possible violations of the 1925 Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous, or other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare (the Geneva Protocol) 1972 Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, and Stockpiling of Bacteriological and Toxin Weapons and Their Destruction (the BTWC).
In its 2003-2004 Global Technology Assessment: Vector Weaponization we identified M·CAM highlighted China’s growing involvement in Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technology with respect to joining the world stage in chimeric construction of viral vectors. Since that time, on a weekly basis, we have monitored the development of research and commercial efforts in this field, including, but not limited to, the research synergies forming between the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institutes for Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Harvard University, Emory University, Vanderbilt University, Tsinghua University, University of Pennsylvania, and their commercial affiliations.
We noted the unusual patent prosecution efforts of the CDC, when on April 25, 2003 they sought to patent the SARS coronavirus that had reportedly transferred to humans during the 2002-2003 SARS outbreak in Asia.
35 U.S.C. §101 prohibits patenting nature. This legality did not deter CDC in their efforts. Their application, updated in 2007, ultimately issued as U.S. Patent 7,776,521 and constrained anyone not licensed by their patent from developing tests or kits to measure SARS coronavirus in humans. Work associated with this virus by their select collaborators included considerable amounts of chimeric engineering, gain-of-function studies, viral characterization, detection, treatment (both vaccine and therapeutic intervention), and weaponization inquiries.
We noted that gain-of-function specialist, Dr. Ralph Baric, was both the recipient of millions of dollars of U.S. research grants from several federal agencies but also sat on the World Health Organization’s International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) and the Coronaviridae Study Group (CSG). In this capacity, he was both responsible for determining “novelty” of clades of virus species but directly benefitted from determining declarations of novelty in the form of new research funding authorizations and associated patenting and commercial collaboration.
Together with CDC, NIAID, WHO, academic and commercial parties (including Johnson & Johnson; Sanofi and their several coronavirus patent holding biotech companies; Moderna; Ridgeback; Gilead; Sherlock Biosciences; and, others), a powerful group of interests constituted what we would suggest are “interlocking directorates” under U.S. anti-trust laws.
These entities also were affiliated with the WHO’s Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB) whose members were instrumental in the Open Philanthropy-funded global coronavirus pandemic “desk-top” exercise EVENT 201 in October 2019. This event, funded by the principal investor in Sherlock Biosciences and linking interlocking funding partner, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation into the GPMB mandate for a respiratory disease global preparedness exercise to be completed by September 2020 alerted us September 8-16, 2020 to anticipate an “epidemic” scenario. We expected to see such a scenario emerge from Wuhan or Guangdong China, northern Italy, Seattle, New York or a combination thereof, as Dr. Zhengli Shi and Dr. Baric’s work on zoonotic transmission of coronavirus identified overlapping mutations in coronavirus in bat populations located in these areas.
mark francis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 17,679
Coronavirus Anti-trust Foundations
1984 1986-1990 Dr. Anthony Fauci appointed Director of the NIAID NIAID Grant AI 23946 leading to patent U.S. 7,279,327 “Methods for Producing Recombinant Coronavirus” Filed 2002 and issued 2007 https:// patents.google.com/patent/US7279327B2/ru This is the first documented commerce association between Dr. Anthony Fauci, NIAID and Dr. Ralph Baric’s recombinant coronavirus enterprise and constitutes the origin of the alleged criminal conspiracy. ...
Pfizer files U.S. Patent 6,372,224 ... Ralph Baric AI23946 and GM63228 from the National Institutes of Health actively working recombinant CoV. NIAID and Baric monopolize and conspire to monopolize recombinant coronavirus by entering into a contract using NIH funds for the purpose of restraining trade on coronavirus.
15 USC §1-3 National Institute of Health, Allergy and Infectious diseases.
“Reverse Genetics with a Coronavirus Infectious cDNA Construct.” 4/1/2001-3/31/005 $1.0 million total costs/yr. ... the patent ...
These patents give the U.S. Department of Health and September 8-16, 2020 Human Services the ability to control the commercial exploitation of SARS coronavirus. ... Dr. Anthony Fauci appointed to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s Global Grand Challenges Scientific Advisory Board (served through 2010).
In violation of 15 USC §19, Dr. Fauci has an interlocking directorate violation as NIAID, NIH, and World Health Organization all share common commercial activities. ... patent US7,151,163 ... U.S. Patent 7,618,802 ... U.S. Patent 7,750,123 ... This research is supported by several NIH grants ... At this conference, the term “The New Normal” was introduced by Merck FAUCI AND BARIC start making money!!!
National Institutes of Health, Allergy and Infectious Diseases. SARS Reverse Genetics.
AI059136-01. $1.7 million total costs, ...
7/1/04-6/30/09. $2.1 million November 22, 2004 University of Hong Kong ... with $10,189,682 to UNC Chapel Hill ... with $5,448,656 to UNC Chapel Hill (non-competitive grant from NIAID) Violation of 15 USC §8. ... with $8,747,142 to UNC Chapel Hill (non-competitive grant from NIAID) Violation of 15 USC §8. ...
On November 4, 2015, the USPTO issued a non-final rejection on this original patent rejecting all claims.
September 8-16, 2020 https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=0434507 with reference to the grant funding ... with $7,344,820 to UNC Chapel Hill (non-competitive grant from NIAID) Violation of 15 USC §8. ... with $7,627,657 to UNC Chapel Hill (non-competitive grant from NIAID) Violation of 15 USC §8. ...with $7,226,237 to UNC Chapel Hill (non-competitive grant from NIAID) Violation of 15 USC §8. ...
The five year grant of $79 million was divided with $37.5 million going to Whitley’s Antiviral Drug Discovery and Development Center at UAB with the balanced divided among Columbia University, Vanderbilt University and the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. ...
Fauci and Dr. Chris Elias sit on the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board for the WHO stipulating the need to have a global exercise on the accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen by September 2020. Violation of 15 USC § 19.
September 8-16, 2020 2020 February - Fauci, Baric, and others lament the absence of funding for coronavirus research ...
https://www.statnews.com/2020/02/10/fluctuating-funding-and-flagging interest-hurt-coronavirus-research/ This statement was misleading as Dr. Baric’s lab had received million of dollars of non-competitive awards from NIAID without the requirement to “apply” for such funds. ...
Over 5000 patents and patent applications have included reference to SARS Coronavirus dating back to priority dates of 1998. They are summarized below. ...
M·CAM and Knowledge Ecology International have independently confirmed that Moderna has violated U.S. law in failing to disclose the U.S. government’s funding interest in their patents and patent applications. ...
The specific claims addressing the pivot to the SARS Coronavirus were patented on March 28, 2019 – 9 months before the SARS CoV-2 outbreak!
Both the patent and the DARPA funding for the technology were disclosed in scientific publication (New England Journal of Medicine) but the government funds were not acknowledged in the patent. ...
In short, while Moderna enjoys hundreds of millions of dollars of funding allegiance and advocacy from Anthony Fauci and his NIAID, since its inception, it has been engaged in illegal patent activity and demonstrated contempt for U.S. Patent law. To make matters worse, the U.S. Government has given it financial backing in the face of undisclosed infringement risks potentially contributing to the very infringement for which they are indemnified. ... On March 28, 2019 (9 months before the SARS outbreak), Moderna altered a rejected patent application in which they stated that vaccine development for SARS coronavirus was initiated based on concern for a “deliberate release of SARS coronavirus”. Since 2010, Moderna has known that other companies own the patent on lipid nanoparticles (LNP) required to deliver the vaccine.
Given Moderna’s over 130 cases of violating the law in their patent filing and given their executives’ stock sales, ...
2017034072 5 COMBINATION PIV3/HMPV RNA VACCINES September 8-16, 2020 there is reason to be concerned that Dr. Anthony Fauci is setting up President Trump for a patent infringement injunction on the eve of the vaccine approval.
Dr. Fauci has been promoting a vaccine that clearly violates the Federal Acquisition Regulations and he’s likely known it since the company’s IPO in 2018.
mark francis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 17,679
What I mean by "deep state" is the system of collaboration between citizens and officials who bend the rules for personal gain and/or support the coverup of that bending of rules for personal gain. In her words, members of the deep state show allegiance to those people and ideas that promote their own interests over the good of all and the rule of law.
Phoenix68
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2022
- Messages
- 9,092
![_118375100_gettyimages-1304610824[1].jpg](https://www.houseofpolitics.com/data/attachments/9/9303-1bebcf753e423c420ee3eba076274cf5.jpg "_118375100_gettyimages-1304610824[1].jpg")
Boris Norris
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2022
- Messages
- 11,417
The deep state refered to by the Maga cultists is some ridiculous regime headed by Obama to destroy Trump. Rubbish.
mark francis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 17,679
That's not the deep state I refer to. The deep state I refer to is composed of the collective mob of businessmen and politicians who contribute to maintaining the status quo by lying, cheating, deceiving and supporting those who lie, cheat, and steal in order to keep the money flowing at the expense of others for whom they have little love or concern.
the problem really is that lying righties claim things are true with no proof just because it fits their agenda. lol
nothing you've posted proves the origin of covid, liar
Boris Norris
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2022
- Messages
- 11,417
That rant means nothing without naming them.
It's bullshyt.
mark francis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 17,679
Obama is to be blamed for the lying and spying on Trump in 2016 in efforts to sway the election in Hillary's favor.
mark francis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 17,679
Doofuses claim they don't know how covid started so they sit on the sidelines and mock experts who do know and say how covid started.
mark francis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 17,679
Name those in the deep state who have perverted justice and broken faith with the American people? Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Adam Schiff, Chris Wray, Merrick Garland, Hillary Clinton, James Comey, Robert Mueller, and thousands more.
Boris Norris
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2022
- Messages
- 11,417
How did I know they would all be democrats for which you have nothing to prove it but your paranoia.
It must be awful for you to tolerate a head full of bullshyt then try to function properly. Little wonder you're a lunatic.
Werbung:
Boris Norris
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2022
- Messages
- 11,417
Of course. I'll speak to him about it.
Similar threads
