Here we go again.

[mark francis]

lbj? he won big because the repubicans chose a stupid candidate.
just like republicans did in 2020

Do you think Landslide Lyndon refers to a major Lyndon landslide?

 

[pjmret]

Do you think Landslide Lyndon refers to a major Lyndon landslide?

well your posts are always so vague one has to interpret them. landslide lyndon sure sounds like a landslide by lyndon. lol

 

[mark francis]

well your posts are always so vague one has to interpret them. landslide lyndon sure sounds like a landslide by lyndon. lol

You should look it up. It is a funny story because most Americans saw how crooks illegally boosted Lyndon's vote count after all other ballots had been counted and Lyndon was losing. Did voter fraud hurt in that election? That depends on what people think about Johnson's involvement with the JFK assassination and his responsibility for committing US troops to fight in the Vietnam conflict.

 

[pjmret]

You should look it up. It is a funny story because most Americans saw how crooks illegally boosted Lyndon's vote count after all other ballots had been counted and Lyndon was losing.

nah, you should post what you are talking about. that's usually how this works. i'm not here to try and read your "mind"

 

[Boris Norris]

Democrats show an alarming tendency to oppose voting securities designed to limit fraud, thus reinforcing their reputation for decades-long addictions to voting fraud.

The democrats never opposed it. The electoral staff did their job.
The machines were examined and found to be correct and that evidence will be used in Trump's trial. It's already accepted as evidence.
Sorry again with your stupid excuses idiot.

 

[Boris Norris]

Democrats show an alarming tendency to oppose voting securities designed to limit fraud, thus reinforcing their reputation for decades-long addictions to voting fraud.

Just wanted to slip this in to cheer you up.

 

[Boris Norris]

Just wanted to slip this in to cheer you up.

You'll love this one about your new republican speaker.

 

[mark francis]

nah, you should post what you are talking about. that's usually how this works. i'm not here to try and read your "mind"

Try googling "Landslide Lyndon,"

 

[mark francis]

The democrats never opposed it. The electoral staff did their job.
The machines were examined and found to be correct and that evidence will be used in Trump's trial. It's already accepted as evidence.
Sorry again with your stupid excuses idiot.

There is evidence the machines were not examined by non-Democrat experts like the leftist media claims. There are also unresolved issues that the leftist media seeks to ignore, such as:

 

[mark francis]

The democrats never opposed it. The electoral staff did their job.
The machines were examined and found to be correct and that evidence will be used in Trump's trial. It's already accepted as evidence.
Sorry again with your stupid excuses idiot.

Democrats oppose voter IDs, citizenship verifications, and voter roll purges of names of ineligible voters. There is no reason to oppose these except to protect the practice of voting fraud.

 

[pjmret]

Democrats oppose voter IDs, citizenship verifications, and voter roll purges of names of ineligible voters. There is no reason to oppose these except to protect the practice of voting fraud.

you mean no reason you can think of or accept.

i hope you opposed the voter roll purges in ohio and virginia that erroneously purged valid voters.
but I don't think you'll find that dems oppose valid purges, but feel free to prove they do.

 

[mark francis]

you mean no reason you can think of or accept.

i hope you opposed the voter roll purges in ohio and virginia that erroneously purged valid voters.
but I don't think you'll find that dems oppose valid purges, but feel free to prove they do.

A small percentage of errors will no doubt occur in any operation but claiming we should do away with voter securities because of a small percentage of fixable errors is insane.

 

[pjmret]

A small percentage of errors will no doubt occur in any operation but claiming we should do away with voter securities because of a small percentage of fixable errors is insane.

who said we should "do away with securities"? you make such broad statements that are vague and meaningless.

 

[pjmret]

There is evidence the machines were not examined by non-Democrat experts like the leftist media claims. There are also unresolved issues that the leftist media seeks to ignore, such as:
View attachment 8606

which election processes were not followed in georgia?

Fulton County officials told Reuters in July 2022 that, “At the time, the law did NOT require that the files be maintained, meaning, there were no requirements or guidelines to maintain ballot images from the ICP scanner used for advance voting and election day before the November 2020 election. “it appears that, at the time of the 2020 election, nothing in Rule 183-1-12-.13 expressly required election officials themselves to keep either the original electronic ballot images, or an electronic copy of them, after the period for requesting a recount had elapsed to make them available for public inspection.” 

so the "missing images" weren't required to be kept.

The office of Georgia Secretary of State sent the following statement by Raffensperger to Reuters via email: “Georgia votes with paper ballots, and all of the actual paper ballots from November’s election were counted three times, including a 100 percent hand recount in which teams of poll workers touched and saw every vote cast. There is zero doubt that three counts of the ballots resulted in conclusive results on who won the election in Georgia. Wishful thinking by conspiracy theorists cannot change the outcome, no matter what immaterial technicality they claim to have identified this week.”

recounted 3 times.

sorry you guys lost. duh lol

 

[mark francis]

who said we should "do away with securities"? you make such broad statements that are vague and meaningless.

Voter IDs provide a measure of security in elections by making it harder for cheaters to cheat. This is not complicated stuff.