I Don't Care !!!

Werbung:
I'm sorry that you refuse to understand the facts.
have a nice day.

Facts:

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationw...eddybear5dec05,1,2508003.story?coll=la-europe

...of the two British peers who negotiated her release. "There was clearly no intention on the part of the teacher to deliberately insult the Islamic faith. . . . We are glad this has finally been recognized," he said.

Lord Nazir Ahmed, a Labor Party peer, and Baroness Sayeeda Warsi, a Conservative, met with Sudanese officials and President Omar Hassan Ahmed Bashir, who granted Gibbons a presidential pardon.

Muslim peer flies to Sudan in hope of freeing jailed teacher: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/africa/article2980644.ece
 
...

Omar M. Ahmad founder of CAIR said:

"Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant" he said. "The Koran, the Muslim book of scripture, should be the highest authority in America , and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth," he said.

Don't you think Christians say the same thing about the Bible and Christianity?

Every religion wants their faith to be the only accepted religion and to be the basis for all societies on the planet. Hell, Christians are waiting for an apocalypse that will do exactly that.

I don't see how this means that they advocate violent overthrow of America and the imposition of Islam.
 
Don't you think Christians say the same thing about the Bible and Christianity?

Every religion wants their faith to be the only accepted religion and to be the basis for all societies on the planet. Hell, Christians are waiting for an apocalypse that will do exactly that.

I don't see how this means that they advocate violent overthrow of America and the imposition of Islam.
look a little further and it's quite clear that the intention is world super power. but the definition of super power in Islam means government/religion 24/7 since they are a religious government. Sharia Law.

comparing Christianity to Islam isn't possible. read Robert Spencers latest book. he clearly explains your delima.
 
look a little further and it's quite clear that the intention is world super power. but the definition of super power in Islam means government/religion 24/7 since they are a religious government. Sharia Law.

comparing Christianity to Islam isn't possible. read Robert Spencers latest book. he clearly explains your delima.

LOL.

Take a look at augustine of hippo's civitas dei. It shows exactly what the christian movement was originally about.
 
Facts:

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationw...eddybear5dec05,1,2508003.story?coll=la-europe

...of the two British peers who negotiated her release. "There was clearly no intention on the part of the teacher to deliberately insult the Islamic faith. . . . We are glad this has finally been recognized," he said.

Lord Nazir Ahmed, a Labor Party peer, and Baroness Sayeeda Warsi, a Conservative, met with Sudanese officials and President Omar Hassan Ahmed Bashir, who granted Gibbons a presidential pardon.

Muslim peer flies to Sudan in hope of freeing jailed teacher: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/africa/article2980644.ece

Whats your theory here coyote? Two muslims who opposed a death sentence balances out the THOUSANDS of Muslims who called for her execution?
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2007-11-30-sudan_N.htm
 
Whats your theory here coyote? Two muslims who opposed a death sentence balances out the THOUSANDS of Muslims who called for her execution?
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2007-11-30-sudan_N.htm

Two?


That's what happens when you cherry pick your sources. It was two high level Muslim peers who actively intervened for her release. But there were many more who protested the Sudanese actions.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7124447.stm
He said: "Through the course of Mrs Gibbons's detention I was glad to see Muslim groups across the UK express strong support for her case.

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=3940765

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7124447.stm

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22849161-12813,00.html

http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2007/12/07/are-moderate-muslims-mum-when-they-should-speak-out/
 
Whats your theory here coyote? thousands of muslims who opposed a death sentence balances out the THOUSANDS of Muslims who called for her execution?




Two?


That's what happens when you cherry pick your sources. It was two high level Muslim peers who actively intervened for her release. But there were many more who protested the Sudanese actions.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7124447.stm
He said: "Through the course of Mrs Gibbons's detention I was glad to see Muslim groups across the UK express strong support for her case.

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=3940765

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7124447.stm

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22849161-12813,00.html

http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2007/12/07/are-moderate-muslims-mum-when-they-should-speak-out/
 
Ethics aren't made by people in higher positions in society num - thats a very cynical view. The last thing I like thesedays is being told to base my ethics on those of a God I don't believe exists. At least if legislators do it, it wouldn't be based on a foundation of contradictary lies.

Ethics and morals are subjective to the society that are, there are no universal ethical rules regardless of wether there should be or not. Moral guidelines are made by the people in response to what is around them, and the government follows the people in their beliefs of right and wrong and social customs.
 
....
Hence, the Khilafah would be in one camp whilst the rest of the world would be in the other. Sovereignty for God verses sovereignty for man, the law of God verses the law of man, a civilisation based on divine commands verses a civilisation based on the whims and desires of man.
http://www.mituk.org/?p=64
 
Whats your theory here coyote? thousands of muslims who opposed a death sentence balances out the THOUSANDS of Muslims who called for her execution?

My point is you have no point here. You are condemning an entire faith based on it's extremist factions. You make false claims that Muslims don't speak out against extremism.

You refuse to acknowledge the same problems existing in the doctrines of other faiths.
 
Werbung:
Ethics aren't made by people in higher positions in society num - thats a very cynical view. The last thing I like thesedays is being told to base my ethics on those of a God I don't believe exists. At least if legislators do it, it wouldn't be based on a foundation of contradictary lies.

Ethics aren't made - period.

It is found in the logical operation of the immutable nature of all things.

Ethics and morals are subjective to the society that are, there are no universal ethical rules regardless of wether there should be or not. Moral guidelines are made by the people in response to what is around them, and the government follows the people in their beliefs of right and wrong and social customs.

A subjective morality is a contradiction.

Morality is a measure of good and evil. Any measure divorced from a fixed standard is an indeterminate thing - hence lacking both form and substance.
 
Back
Top