the annoying thing
Well-Known Member
Yes joe Biden was in a frenzied to shut down the negative press
No. He used money which Congress approved many years ago. Other republican POTUS approved the expenditure.
Show the evidence where he denied obeying instructions from the government.
What was the obvious reasons you speak of?
Be specific instead of conspiracies.
So, the answer to my question is that you will believe a cartoon over NASA, NOAA, and CERN. Good to know. I'll keep that in mind as I read your posts.Why should poor people thank Biden for effecting a 5 cent price drop in the cost of gasoline after jacking the price up in the first place more than 30 times that amount?
If climate change alarmists had not lied and got caught manipulating data then fewer Americans would likely question their understanding, conclusions, and motives. But, more than that, leading global warming enthusiasts have openly admitting they take the climate change assumptions and conclusions with a grain of salt because their motives in supporting climate change is using the issue to effect major changes in national finances and societal philosophies and values.
The U.N.'s Global Warming War On Capitalism: An Important History Lesson (forbes.com)
While there can be no doubt that manufactured climate crisis drives multi-billion dollar science and EPA energy regulatory industries, the U.N. has far more ambitious goals. As Christine Stewart, then Canadian Minister of the Environment, speaking before editors and reporters of the Calgary Herald in 1998, said, “No matter if the science of global warming is all phony…climate change [provides] the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.”
What's the problem here?Did Obama Admin Give Wuhan Laboratory a $3.7 Million Grant?
While it isn't unusual to see international cooperation in the field of virology, this claim stretches the truth.www.snopes.com
In April 2020, reports started to circulate that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) had provided the Wuhan Institute of Virology a $3.7 million grant in 2015, while former U.S. President Obama was still in office. These reports were often accompanied by the evidence-free suggestion that the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19 had "escaped" from this lab and the insinuation that, since this lab reportedly received funding from the Obama administration, the pandemic was therefore Obama's fault.
This claim received widespread attention on April 17 when a reporter from the conservative outlet Newsmax asked President Donald Trump about it during a White House press briefing.
Newsmax reporter Emerald Robinson asked: "Thank you, Mr. President. U.S. Intelligence is saying this week that the coronavirus likely came from a level 4 lab in Wuhan. There's also another report that the NIH under the Obama administration in 2015 gave that lab $3.7 million in a grant. Why would the U.S. give a grant like that to China?"
Trump responded: "The Obama administration gave them a grant of $3.7 million. I've been hearing about that. And we've instructed that if any grants are going to that area we're looking at it, literally about an hour ago, also early in the morning, we will end that grant very quickly. But it was granted quite awhile ago. They were granted a substantial amount of money."
Fact-based subject matter is what makes good political cartoons, not lies.So, the answer to my question is that you will believe a cartoon over NASA, NOAA, and CERN. Good to know. I'll keep that in mind as I read your posts.
Cartoon by its own name implies it's not real.Fact-based subject matter is what makes good political cartoons, not lies.
If the Republican party urged Obama to authorize funding to Wuhan in 2015 then who urged Trump to suspend funding in 2019, the Democrat party? Do you have facts to support your claims?What's the problem here?
We've known that for many years and republican controlled Congress approved it.
Your point is?
I agree. Cartoons are not scientific reports even if some scientific reports are a joke.Cartoon by its own name implies it's not real.
It might explain items you don't understand but would be good evidence in a court.
Again, all you need is evidence of what you say instead of relying on your new found Democrat hate cartoon source.I agree. Cartoons are not scientific reports even if some scientific reports are a joke.
I love humor especially when its political and has a hint of truthFact-based subject matter is what makes good political cartoons, not lies.
Boris forgets that gas prices were around 2.30 a gallon or less and inflation was very low around 2 percent when trump left office it didn't start until after Blow hole Joe took office .Let's get this straight. Who threw money out the door, Trump or the House Ways and Means Committee with their mandated government spending measures?
Yes facts which your cartoons are short on lolFact-based subject matter is what makes good political cartoons, not lies.
Cool infrastructure is good more useful than oil sitting undergroundNow comes a question for my democrat friends , what happened to the billions of dollars from the oil joe sold ? And do you know he plans on selling more to fund one of his bills ?
U.S. infrastructure deal includes $6 billion sale from oil reserve -document
The infrastructure deal struck by a group of bipartisan senators and President Joe Biden on Thursday includes partial funding by a proposed $6 billion sale from the U.S. emergency oil reserve, according to a document circulated by Republican lawmakers.www.reuters.com