John Kerry has decided not to run again for President in 2008. Does anyone think he would have had a shot anyhow? What about his former running mate, John Edwards. Do you think he has a shot?
I don't really see Edwards winning but I could be wrong on that one. As for Kerry I had not heard that he had decided for sure not to run. Doesn't really surprise all that much that he is not running though.
Again I see a few parallels to Australian politics here, but the super-simple version as I see it is that Kerry recognised that he ought not to run in 2008 as the first impression he made as a presidential candidate was particularly uninspiring.
This is exactly the same thing that happened to Kim Beazely. He might be a compassionate and honest intellectual but he also has this gift for being marvellously unsubstantial.
With so many folks forming exploratory committees, I wonder who will pony up today. While I might be tempted to listen to John Edwards and what he has to say, I do not think he has a chance of garnering the nomination.
I personally think that Kerry's time has passed, and applaud his decision to not run in the 2008 presidential race. Right now, I can only think of 3 or 4 people for the Democratic ticket, but I'm not sure.
Currently there are about 12 people who have formed exploratory committees on the DNC side and about 5 or 6 that have formed committees on the Republican side.
My question is, for the Senators that are "running" for President, don't they do their constituents a disservice by being out on the stump instead of being in Congress doing the job they were elected to do?
That's a touchy subject...I'm a New York state resident. Pretty much everyone has been calling Hillary's move to run for president since she won the Senate seat. I think the general hope is that they will do good for the country as a whole, not just your individual state. Just how often that actually happens though...who knows.
I just think that if they're elected to an office, they have the responsibility to do the job they're being paid to do - vote on items that come up for vote. How many votes do those Senators miss while they're out on the road? I think the number is pretty high, since you must be present to vote. What votes would have had a different outcome if ALL the Senators were there to vote?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.