Obama being sued over his citizenship! Prove it!!

Well, I don't think that a guy with the qualifications as Mr. Berg would go that far without knowing the law. This guy has been a long time democrat, has served a chariman of the DNC in Philly and has been a disctrict attorney in Philly. This judge doesn't want to get his hands in the mud and get drawn into a very controversial issue in the nation. I think that's the cowards way to do it.... We'll see what happens next...
Berg is the same crackpot that sued GWB, Cheney and a host of others for 9/11... He also lost his position as deputy attorney general in PA proportedly because he could not handle the job. (I understand political connections - not merit - got him the job in the first place)... This guy has filed a host of frivilous lawsuits in the past and this is just the latest in the line.
 
Werbung:
Berg is the same crackpot that sued GWB, Cheney and a host of others for 9/11... He also lost his position as deputy attorney general in PA proportedly because he could not handle the job. (I understand political connections - not merit - got him the job in the first place)... This guy has filed a host of frivilous lawsuits in the past and this is just the latest in the line.

If you're gonna mamke accusations, then prove them...
 
The same way that you believe that he's the Messiah!!!
I absolute do not believe that Obama (or anyone else on this earth) is the Messiah. Obama is a man - he puts his pants on the same as any man and has faults just like any man. I just happen to feel he is the better man for the POTUS and firmly believe that the FEC has already seen his BC and confirmed it real.
 
If you're gonna mamke accusations, then prove them...

From 2005:
Finding that a Pennsylvania lawyer had committed a "laundry list of unethical actions," a federal judge has imposed more than $10,000 in sanctions and ordered the lawyer to complete six hours of ethics training.

U.S. District Judge J. Curtis Joyner's 10-page opinion in Holsworth v. Berg is packed with criticism of the conduct of attorney Philip Berg of Lafayette Hill, Pa.

"Other attorneys should look to Mr. Berg's actions as a blueprint for what not to do when attempting to effectively and honorably perform the duties of the legal profession," Joyner wrote.

"This court has grown weary of Mr. Berg's continuous and brazen disrespect toward this court and his own clients. Mr. Berg's actions ... are an enormous waste of judicial time and resources that this court cannot, in good conscience, allow to go unpunished," Joyner wrote.

http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1122023117263


There's whole bunch more on this nut Berg here:

http://www.yestodemocracy.com/yes_to_democracy_no_to_pu/2008/08/wingnuts-away-.html
 
If you're gonna mamke accusations, then prove them...
Below is the content of a letter Philip Berg sent to various world leaders about 9/11 - I believe most will believe he is a crackpot after reading the letter.
Philip J. Berg, Esquire stated in a letter to the nations throughout the world:
“It is time for the nations of the world to come forth and take the leadership because of the failure of the United States Government and the States where crimes were committed on 09/11/01, where no thorough investigation and indictments occurred, to investigate, arrest and prosecute the people responsible for the murders on 9/11/01, specifically including George W. Bush and Richard Cheney. ”
Berg continued there is overwhelming evidence that:
“Bush and his cronies made 9/11 happen or let it happen. And, if they let it happen, then they made it happen. Either way, they are responsible; and more important, they have completely and unequivocally covered-it-up!”
Berg’s letter went on to say:
“The trial and execution of Saddam Hussein marks the “end of a difficult year for the Iraqi people and for our troops” according to President Bush.
Now, it is time for world leaders to take the lesson learned from Iraq and issue a warrant for the arrest of George W. Bush and Richard Cheney; arrest them; take them to a neutral country; try them for the murder of over 2,800 people from more than 80 countries on 9/11/01 and, when found guilty, sentence them appropriately. Jurisdiction would be proper in any of the more than 80 countries whose citizens were murdered on 9/11.
Despite a near-complete corporate media embargo on the wealth of evidence indicating that the 9/11 attacks were caused or knowingly permitted to happen by top figures in the Administration and the military, 84 % of the U.S. public, according to an October 2006 CBS/NY Times poll, is unconvinced by the “Official Story,” and agrees that the President and others caused or allowed the attacks to happen.
That an event such as 9/11 was desired by powerful Administration figures, including Cheney and Jeb Bush, the President’s brother, is a matter of record, as the Project for the New American Century’s [PNAC] blueprint for worldwide U.S. dominance entitled “Rebuilding America’s Defenses,” stated that the program they advocated could win popular support only with the help of a “catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor” which (we are supposed to believe to be coincidence) came to pass just 8 months after many of the co-signers of the PNAC document assumed high positions in the new Bush Administration in January 2001.
As President John F. Kennedy stated, “Things do not just happen; they are made to happen.” There has never been an investigation of 9/11 that had not concluded, before it even began, that the Official Story convicting Osama bin Laden and absolving the Administration and the military of complicity of anything worse than “intelligence failures,” which thereby made the outcome a foregone conclusion.
It is time that the men who had the motive, means and the opportunity to commit the terrible crimes of 9/11, and who have profited by it politically as well as financially, be exposed for their role and held to account.
The world has suffered since the horrific acts of Bush and his cronies on 9/11, that being the events of 9/11 and the aftermath, the illegal act of war against Afghanistan and Iraq that has caused the death and injury of hundreds of thousands, including thousands of U.S. troops; the destruction of property and the enormous costs involved.
Saddam was tried, found guilty and sentenced to death after being convicted of murder in the killings of 148 Shiite Muslims from an Iraqi town where assassins tried to kill him in 1982. This number of killings that Saddam Hussein was found guilty of is far less than Bush and his cronies caused to die on 9/11.
The 148 Iraqi deaths for which Saddam was tried pales in number to the 750,000 dead at the hands of George W. Bush as a result of this illegal invasion of that country which includes babies, sons, daughters, mothers, fathers, elderly grandmothers and grandfathers, killed without remorse by George W. Bush and his war profiteering supporters.
Bush continues the war in Iraq to keep the world’s attention there and not on the atrocities caused by him on 9/11, including the possibility of Bush sending up to 40,000 more troops to Iraq, even though a majority of the American people are against this increase.
The world must act now because our own government has failed us. We cannot relent until real justice is reached. Only by exposing the truth of 9/11 and revealing how it was used as the “trigger event” to justify the neocon’s imperial policy can we put these events in proper prospective.”
Source of quote
 
As I said before, it seemed that this Judge didn't want to be part of a long contested presidetial race;

This is a quote from his 34 page findings:

According to the Hon. R. Barclay Surrick, that's completely up to Congress to decide.

If, through the political process, Congress determines that citizens, voters, or party members should police the Constitution’s eligibility requirements for the Presidency, then it is free to pass laws conferring standing on individuals like Plaintiff. Until that time, voters do not have standing to bring the sort of challenge that Plaintiff attempts to bring in the Amended Complaint.

Congress? We all know what would happen if it ever gets there.....
 
Below is the content of a letter Philip Berg sent to various world leaders about 9/11 - I believe most will believe he is a crackpot after reading the letter.Source of quote


OK, SO he's a democrat and as a democrat and as patriot he was pissed about what happened to the nation. Are you saying that because of this letter he was let go of his position?

I don't think I follow....
 
As I said before, it seemed that this Judge didn't want to be part of a long contested presidetial race;

This is a quote from his 34 page findings:



Congress? We all know what would happen if it ever gets there.....

Obama and the Democratic National Committee had asked Surrick to dismiss Berg's complaint in a court filing on Sept. 24.

They said that Berg's claims were "ridiculous" and "patently false," that Berg had "no standing" to challenge the qualifications of a candidate for president because he had not shown the requisite harm to himself.

Surrick agreed.


In a 34-page memorandum and opinion, the judge said Berg's allegations of harm were "too vague and too attenuated" to confer standing on him or any other voters.

Surrick ruled that Berg's attempts to use certain laws to gain standing to pursue his claim that Obama was not a natural-born citizen were "frivolous and not worthy of discussion."

The judge also said the harm Berg alleged did "not constitute an injury in fact" and Berg's arguments to the contrary "ventured into the unreasonable."

Nothing more need be said...you should be embarrassed for even starting this ridiculous thread based on the actions of a crackpot....case dismissed.
 
Nothing more need be said...you should be embarrassed for even starting this ridiculous thread based on the actions of a crackpot....case dismissed.

Well, thank you for proving my theory of the DNC and this judge being incahoots.... :rolleyes:
 
Werbung:
OK, SO he's a democrat and as a democrat and as patriot he was pissed about what happened to the nation. Are you saying that because of this letter he was let go of his position?

I don't think I follow....
No, it is my understanding that ethics questions and rudeness to judges, other counsel and clients were the basis of that action.
 
Back
Top