Bush gave a whole speech about the middle east. The only thing the lib media (the same lib media that picked up the "soundbite" defense for Rev. Wright) reported on is their own hyperdefensive interpretation about a presumed attack on their hero. As Bush suggested in his speech, the idea that after all the interactions with the iranians, including years long fruitless efforts by the self-styled masters of diplomacy, the euroweenies, the notion that there is some magic undiscovered combination of words that will make the iranian islamofascists throw up their hands and say "WELL! Since you put it like that...." is silly, and (since YOU brought up the Flawless One) that a presidential candidate would seriously entertain such an idea is scary.
Wait a minute there. You need to go back and re-read my post. The only persons I named was Bush and Kennedy. No Carter, Obama or whatnot. You see this is the problem with %90 of your arguments, is that they are gutless, off base and blameful of one side of the aisle and totally overlook what the Bush and neo-con regime Americans have dealt with over the last 7+ years.
I listened to the whole damn speech. If I was an Israeli I would be damned pissed the leader of another country came there on the historic event and turned the speech into a domestic fight when Bush himself hasnt done jack squat on the issue.
Under Bush, ALQ has grown, we are mired in a country based on lies, NKorea went nuclear, Osama Bin Laden has not been caught. For all his talk on being tough on terror, he hasnt been anything but a bumbling idiot, this country would be better off if his borderline literate duff was still sitting on a chair reading school books to the kids in Florida.
