This just in..They tried the same test on MSNBC, but could not find enough viewers..
touche
This just in..They tried the same test on MSNBC, but could not find enough viewers..
Why touché?
Low viewing figures is a comment on the popularity of the program and if you are suggesting that this unpopular program is the dems equivalent of Fox then what you are really saying is that dems are much less likely to be sucked in by propaganda.
Which is a fair point and consequently a rather spectacular backfire rather than a touché[/quote.. I can see where you might come up with that response..The truth is no one cares what they have to say..
This just in..They tried the same test on MSNBC, but could not find enough viewers..
They also tried to stage a nativity scene, but couldn't.
No, it wasn't because of opposition from atheists.
It was because they couldn't find three wise men and a virgin.
If he got that fact wrong then it indicates that he struggles with reason.So whilst you are scoffing at the few smart people on this board remember that you believe an angel impregnated a woman
It is no wonder you struggle with reason
Having watched Fox News (reluctantly) at least once a week for over 4 years and having debated with Fox addicts in several forums . . I had a strong suspicion that this may be true.
I'm a FOX viewer. Wanna try your hand debating me to see if you're really as smart as you think you are?? I'm ready when you are, kid, and I'm willing to tie half my brain behind my back so the debate is more fair!
You and Limbaugh!
That remark is enough to give me a pretty good idea of your level of intellect and the arguments you would be rabashing again!
been there, done that. . . I'm not interested in what you have to say, not about after the best "come on" you have to offer comes straight out of the king Ass Hole half brain!
Have a nice life! LOL!
Eek the horror of debating with JPRD?
Can you imagine such a powerful adversary?
To be fair it is quite hard arguing with someone who uses as the foundation of their beliefs an older version of Harry potter, who is a genocide denier and struggles with consistency
But go on, I'm happy to give it a whirl
It is quite funny reading his fundamentalist rants that seek to rewrite any facts that get in the way of some good old fashioned White right rehashed propaganda
OK, how's this:
JRPD and openmind can open a new thread (or I'll do it if you prefer). Select any subject both can agree on. The rest of us will simply read along, remaining silent. After a couple of days, we'll all vote on the winner, based on:
facts that support the writer's opinion,
credible sources cited,
lack of logical fallacies,
(go ahead, suggest other factors)
and whoever starts with the personal attacks loses automatically.
Are you up for that?
OK, how's this:
JRPD and openmind can open a new thread (or I'll do it if you prefer). Select any subject both can agree on. The rest of us will simply read along, remaining silent. After a couple of days, we'll all vote on the winner, based on:
facts that support the writer's opinion,
credible sources cited,
lack of logical fallacies,
(go ahead, suggest other factors)
and whoever starts with the personal attacks loses automatically.
Are you up for that?