The Mar-a-Lago raid was staged by lying leftist officials working for Democrats

No it's well documented legal *****

Your source lies because it claims Trump was not allowed to have the materials the FBI seized although it has been proven the FBI seized materials they should not have seized and the FBI made no effort to discover whether or not Trump had declassified any of the documents they seized under the assumption that he had not declassified any of the documents.
 
Werbung:
So she didn't saybtrump was authorized to keep them
As far as I know she said nothing about which materials should not have been seized, which materials Trump had always been allowed to keep, and which materials Trump should not have mistakenly thought he was allowed to keep.
 
Your source lies because it claims Trump was not allowed to have the materials the FBI seized although it has been proven the FBI seized materials they should not have seized and the FBI made no effort to discover whether or not Trump had declassified any of the documents they seized under the assumption that he had not declassified any of the documents.
Nope He had presidential records which he is not allowed to keep
It doesn't matter if they were classified or not
You are a legal *****
 
As far as I know she said nothing about which materials should not have been seized, which materials Trump had always been allowed to keep, and which materials Trump should not have mistakenly thought he was allowed to keep.
No mistake when you hide them, *****
 

It's well documented legal *****
The timeline as posted is accompanied by dishonest and/or completely erroneous opinions and assumptions.
 
Nope He had presidential records which he is not allowed to keep
By allowing Clinton to keep any and all documents he wanted a leftist judge may have shot this case in the head for their efforts to sort which documents Trump was authorized to declassify and which he was not allowed to declassify.

Furthermore, the fact that Biden was never allowed by law to keep and declassify any of the documents he kept for years in his garage and in the office he shared with an official of the Chinese Communist Party leaves leftists in a deep pile of dodoo in their political efforts to destroy Trump before the 2024 election over disputes about classified documents.
 
By allowing Clinton to keep any and all documents he wanted a leftist judge may have shot this case in the head for their efforts to sort which documents Trump was authorized to declassify and which he was not allowed to declassify.

Furthermore, the fact that Biden was never allowed by law to keep and declassify any of the documents he kept for years in his garage and in the office he shared with an official of the Chinese Communist Party leaves leftists in a deep pile of dodoo in their political efforts to destroy Trump before the 2024 election over disputes about classified documents.
No judge said Clinton could keep any document, lying legal *****
 
No judge said Clinton could keep any document, lying legal *****
You will have to explain this 2012 court ruling if you want to prove your debatable claim:

“The [Presidential Records Act] does not confer any mandatory or even discretional authority on the archivist,” wrote U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in that 2012 ruling. “Under the statute, this responsibility is left solely to the president.”
 
You will have to explain this 2012 court ruling if you want to prove your debatable claim:

“The [Presidential Records Act] does not confer any mandatory or even discretional authority on the archivist,” wrote U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in that 2012 ruling. “Under the statute, this responsibility is left solely to the president.”
Two sentences and no context prov3s nothing lol
 
Werbung:
You will have to explain this 2012 court ruling if you want to prove your debatable claim:

“The [Presidential Records Act] does not confer any mandatory or even discretional authority on the archivist,” wrote U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in that 2012 ruling. “Under the statute, this responsibility is left solely to the president.”
David Super, another professor at Georgetown Law, argues the 2012 Clinton case has “absolutely nothing to do with” the charges Trump currently faces. For one thing, the court didn’t dismiss the case because it found that Clinton was entitled to keep the tapes, Super said. Jackson simply ruled that NARA could not turn over the tapes as public records because they were owned by the historian and not government property.

Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign didn’t respond to an email seeking comment, but the Republican and his allies have argued that the judge’s ruling in the case showed that the Presidential Records Act affords presidents complete discretion to delineate between personal and presidential records.

Legal experts this week also dismissed those arguments. Margulies, of Roger Williams University, said the claim “mixes apples and oranges.”

“The Clinton materials were audiotapes of conversations with an historian that incidentally recorded some calls on official business,” he wrote. “In contrast, the documents that Trump kept were all presidential records from the moment they arrived at the Oval Office from other parts of the government.”
Eric Freedman, a professor at Hofstra University’s School of Law in Hempstead, New York, also noted that a federal appeals court has already rejected similar arguments raised by Trump’s legal team as it sought to block the criminal investigation into the records found at Mar-a-Lago.

In either case, Super said, any discussion about the Presidential Records Act is “largely a red herring” because Trump doesn’t face charges of violating that law.

The indictment instead charges Trump with Espionage Act violations, as prosecutors argue the documents he kept could harm the country if obtained by adversaries.
 
Back
Top