Real News Links
Well-Known Member
https://terryobrien.online/stolen_election.htm
On television and in the movies, circumstantial evidence is usually 'blown off' as near nothing. While direct evidence is portrayed as damning. Inference is the key as circumstantial evidence relies on inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact. In effect, circumstantial evidence allows for more than one interpretation and explanation of fact. All forensic evidence supplied on testimony by an expert witness is usually treated as circumstantial evidence.
Cases Won on Circumstantial Evidence
It requires the totality of circumstances to construct an inference, not the obviousness of the conclusion to establish circumstantial evidence. So, the majority of those convicted have been by a majority if not entirely by circumstantial evidence. Guilt or innocence is established by circumstantial evidence through reasoning. In most cases those who commit criminal acts tend to avoid conditions that would provide direct evidence. Criminal activities are generally done in secret, not openly. In the submission of circumstantial evidence, it depends on the attorney of either side to weave various bits and pieces into an understandable whole, or if defending to punch holes into the logical inference. If reasoning is the rational for establishing circumstantial evidence it is logical to expect reasoning to be used to refute it as well.
2020 Election
The totality of circumstances regarding the 2020 Election construct an inference that there was overwhelming fraud, and through reasoning, in a court of law, a prosecutor could convince a jury that the election was stolen.
Evidence
Throughout this website (CLICK HERE) I will post various evidence, videos, documentaries, etc. Some are supportive, and some could prove all by themselves that the election was stolen. The totality of circumstantial evidence will allow us to come to the reasonable conclusion that the election was stolen
GO TO: https://terryobrien.online/stolen_election.htm
On television and in the movies, circumstantial evidence is usually 'blown off' as near nothing. While direct evidence is portrayed as damning. Inference is the key as circumstantial evidence relies on inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact. In effect, circumstantial evidence allows for more than one interpretation and explanation of fact. All forensic evidence supplied on testimony by an expert witness is usually treated as circumstantial evidence.
Cases Won on Circumstantial Evidence
It requires the totality of circumstances to construct an inference, not the obviousness of the conclusion to establish circumstantial evidence. So, the majority of those convicted have been by a majority if not entirely by circumstantial evidence. Guilt or innocence is established by circumstantial evidence through reasoning. In most cases those who commit criminal acts tend to avoid conditions that would provide direct evidence. Criminal activities are generally done in secret, not openly. In the submission of circumstantial evidence, it depends on the attorney of either side to weave various bits and pieces into an understandable whole, or if defending to punch holes into the logical inference. If reasoning is the rational for establishing circumstantial evidence it is logical to expect reasoning to be used to refute it as well.
2020 Election
The totality of circumstances regarding the 2020 Election construct an inference that there was overwhelming fraud, and through reasoning, in a court of law, a prosecutor could convince a jury that the election was stolen.
Evidence
Throughout this website (CLICK HERE) I will post various evidence, videos, documentaries, etc. Some are supportive, and some could prove all by themselves that the election was stolen. The totality of circumstantial evidence will allow us to come to the reasonable conclusion that the election was stolen
GO TO: https://terryobrien.online/stolen_election.htm
