The Stolen Election of 2020 :: Biggest Crime in American History

Werbung:
Evidence in court proves Hillary tried to pervert the election by lying about Trump

These facts have been known for years by those who actually do research. However, for those who like to ignorantly accept without question what they are told by whatever media outlet they listen to these facts may be a new revelation.


Hillary Clinton personally approved sharing with the media a false theory linking former President Donald Trump to Russia even though campaign officials were not “totally confident” in the accuracy of the information, the manager of her 2016 campaign testified in court Friday.
 
Evidence in court proves Hillary tried to pervert the election by lying about Trump

These facts have been known for years by those who actually do research. However, for those who like to ignorantly accept without question what they are told by whatever media outlet they listen to these facts may be a new revelation.


Hillary Clinton personally approved sharing with the media a false theory linking former President Donald Trump to Russia even though campaign officials were not “totally confident” in the accuracy of the information, the manager of her 2016 campaign testified in court Friday.
Yeah we know that but it doesn't matter. We made sure she will never face justice and Joe is the POTUS and you can sit in this and spin 👍.
 
Evidence in court proves Hillary tried to pervert the election by lying about Trump

These facts have been known for years by those who actually do research. However, for those who like to ignorantly accept without question what they are told by whatever media outlet they listen to these facts may be a new revelation.


Hillary Clinton personally approved sharing with the media a false theory linking former President Donald Trump to Russia even though campaign officials were not “totally confident” in the accuracy of the information, the manager of her 2016 campaign testified in court Friday.

so opinion was divided on somethig.

OH NO. lol
 
This Video Proves that Donald Trump Won the 2020 Presidential Election


This video proves that Donald Trump won the 2020 United States Presidential election using voting transactional data. It's 100% provable and verified. If you add in other forms of fraud including, but not limited to, mail-in ballot fraud, dead voters, non citizens voting, thrown out ballots, and other software fraud, Donald Trump won in an absolute landslide. Anything short of a complete audit of the entire United States election process is a fraud on the American people. A complete audit of the entire election process will not only highlight that Donald Trump won the Presidential election, but that other seats in the congress and senate were stolen as well. The American people deserve a fair and honest election.

See original article with links and data at https://sarahwestall.com/trump-won-fraud-proven-analysis-of-voting-data-shows-exactly-what-happened/
 
This Video Proves that Donald Trump Won the 2020 Presidential Election


This video proves that Donald Trump won the 2020 United States Presidential election using voting transactional data. It's 100% provable and verified. If you add in other forms of fraud including, but not limited to, mail-in ballot fraud, dead voters, non citizens voting, thrown out ballots, and other software fraud, Donald Trump won in an absolute landslide. Anything short of a complete audit of the entire United States election process is a fraud on the American people. A complete audit of the entire election process will not only highlight that Donald Trump won the Presidential election, but that other seats in the congress and senate were stolen as well. The American people deserve a fair and honest election.

See original article with links and data at https://sarahwestall.com/trump-won-fraud-proven-analysis-of-voting-data-shows-exactly-what-happened/
Yeah. That's why they inagaurated Biden. Dickhead.
 
This Video Proves that Donald Trump Won the 2020 Presidential Election


This video proves that Donald Trump won the 2020 United States Presidential election using voting transactional data. It's 100% provable and verified. If you add in other forms of fraud including, but not limited to, mail-in ballot fraud, dead voters, non citizens voting, thrown out ballots, and other software fraud, Donald Trump won in an absolute landslide. Anything short of a complete audit of the entire United States election process is a fraud on the American people. A complete audit of the entire election process will not only highlight that Donald Trump won the Presidential election, but that other seats in the congress and senate were stolen as well. The American people deserve a fair and honest election.

See original article with links and data at https://sarahwestall.com/trump-won-fraud-proven-analysis-of-voting-data-shows-exactly-what-happened/


and yet no one could present any credible data to any court.

and fox news won't run with it.

because its all 100% BS. lol
 
https://terryobrien.online/stolen_election.htm

On television and in the movies, circumstantial evidence is usually 'blown off' as near nothing. While direct evidence is portrayed as damning. Inference is the key as circumstantial evidence relies on inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact. In effect, circumstantial evidence allows for more than one interpretation and explanation of fact. All forensic evidence supplied on testimony by an expert witness is usually treated as circumstantial evidence.

Cases Won on Circumstantial Evidence

It requires the totality of circumstances to construct an inference, not the obviousness of the conclusion to establish circumstantial evidence. So, the majority of those convicted have been by a majority if not entirely by circumstantial evidence. Guilt or innocence is established by circumstantial evidence through reasoning. In most cases those who commit criminal acts tend to avoid conditions that would provide direct evidence. Criminal activities are generally done in secret, not openly. In the submission of circumstantial evidence, it depends on the attorney of either side to weave various bits and pieces into an understandable whole, or if defending to punch holes into the logical inference. If reasoning is the rational for establishing circumstantial evidence it is logical to expect reasoning to be used to refute it as well.

2020 Election

The totality of circumstances regarding the 2020 Election construct an inference that there was overwhelming fraud, and through reasoning, in a court of law, a prosecutor could convince a jury that the election was stolen.

Evidence

Throughout this website (CLICK HERE) I will post various evidence, videos, documentaries, etc. Some are supportive, and some could prove all by themselves that the election was stolen. The totality of circumstantial evidence will allow us to come to the reasonable conclusion that the election was stolen

GO TO: https://terryobrien.online/stolen_election.htm


Stolen Election Stolenelectionbanner

Once again, in case there are any new visitors:

On television and in the movies, circumstantial evidence is usually 'blown off' as near nothing. While direct evidence is portrayed as damning. Inference is the key as circumstantial evidence relies on inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact. In effect, circumstantial evidence allows for more than one interpretation and explanation of fact. All forensic evidence supplied on testimony by an expert witness is usually treated as circumstantial evidence.

Cases Won on Circumstantial Evidence

It requires the totality of circumstances to construct an inference, not the obviousness of the conclusion to establish circumstantial evidence. So, the majority of those convicted have been by a majority if not entirely by circumstantial evidence. Guilt or innocence is established by circumstantial evidence through reasoning. In most cases those who commit criminal acts tend to avoid conditions that would provide direct evidence. Criminal activities are generally done in secret, not openly. In the submission of circumstantial evidence, it depends on the attorney of either side to weave various bits and pieces into an understandable whole, or if defending to punch holes into the logical inference. If reasoning is the rational for establishing circumstantial evidence it is logical to expect reasoning to be used to refute it as well.

2020 Election

The totality of circumstances regarding the 2020 Election construct an inference that there was overwhelming fraud, and through reasoning, in a court of law, a prosecutor could convince a jury that the election was stolen.

My website provides such overwhelming evidence:
https://terryobrien.online/stolen_election.htm
 
Once again, in case there are any new visitors:

On television and in the movies, circumstantial evidence is usually 'blown off' as near nothing. While direct evidence is portrayed as damning. Inference is the key as circumstantial evidence relies on inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact. In effect, circumstantial evidence allows for more than one interpretation and explanation of fact. All forensic evidence supplied on testimony by an expert witness is usually treated as circumstantial evidence.

Cases Won on Circumstantial Evidence

It requires the totality of circumstances to construct an inference, not the obviousness of the conclusion to establish circumstantial evidence. So, the majority of those convicted have been by a majority if not entirely by circumstantial evidence. Guilt or innocence is established by circumstantial evidence through reasoning. In most cases those who commit criminal acts tend to avoid conditions that would provide direct evidence. Criminal activities are generally done in secret, not openly. In the submission of circumstantial evidence, it depends on the attorney of either side to weave various bits and pieces into an understandable whole, or if defending to punch holes into the logical inference. If reasoning is the rational for establishing circumstantial evidence it is logical to expect reasoning to be used to refute it as well.

2020 Election

The totality of circumstances regarding the 2020 Election construct an inference that there was overwhelming fraud, and through reasoning, in a court of law, a prosecutor could convince a jury that the election was stolen.

My website provides such overwhelming evidence:
https://terryobrien.online/stolen_election.htm


except ZERO judges believe your legal stupidity. lol.
including many appointed by trump himself and other republicans.

hahahah
hahahah

you morons should stick to knitting and not display your stupidity so much :)
 
Werbung:
Back
Top