Voters in my state are stupid

[Openmind]

Good Point Gipper

So glad I don't have to view the "good points" Gipper makes anymore!

The best feature of this site is that "ignore' feature!

 

[Gipper]

So glad I don't have to view the "good points" Gipper makes anymore!

The best feature of this site is that "ignore' feature!

Typical response from a leftist unable to debate the truth.

But, thanks anyway SteveO.

 

[Pandora]

or a union which is no more a "people" than IBM. just m ake it equal

At least corporations do not force me to join up and pay dues like my union does

 

[dogtowner]

At least corporations do not force me to join up and pay dues like my union does

and if you were to feel that your employer were in violation of worker's rights legislation it would be the government suing your employer or you yourself. so you are paying your money for nothing except for lowest common denominator compensation. any initiative you personally might have to excel as a means to improve your situation is made moot as you are subject to whatever the worst performing worker can expect.

such a deal huh ?

I was very pleased to see Indiana made itself a right to work state. they too may now hope to see their fortu es im prove as have other right to work states. I'll never understand why any state would not crave being right to work.

 

[pocketfullofshells]

Why would you dislike the Citizens United decision? It is evident to anyone paying attention that corporations give just as much if not more to Ds (commies really). http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2010/11/democrats-and-republicans-sharing-b.html

It is a fallacy held by many leftists like yourself, that the wealthy give more to Rs. I would not doubt, if we studied this issue, we would find the wealthy give more to Ds (commies really).
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/kevinglass/2011/05/09/evil,_greedy_ceos_give_heavily_to_democrats

Facebook is about to do an IPO and earn BILLIONS. It is well known that that doufus founder of Facebook is a dumb D. No doubt some of that money will end up with the Ds...and probably some illegally. Google is also a well known lib giver. In fact, I suspect most of the tech industry loves your Messiah and gives handsomely. Even Trump gives richly to the FAT CAT Ds - commies really.

Because its not good for the party or the nation to have leaders bought and paid for...thats what we have Republicans for.

 

[pocketfullofshells]

At least corporations do not force me to join up and pay dues like my union does

Poor you, must suck with extra job securty, better pay, better benifits...awww poor you..

You have the freedom to work someplace else....Is that not what republicans always say when Union people are mad about there workplace trying to do something...does it not apply to you?

 

[Gipper]

Because its not good for the party or the nation to have leaders bought and paid for...thats what we have Republicans for.

Agreed. But, do you think your beloved Ds are not bought and paid for, just like the Rs???????

I believe you would say no to that question, proving once again, you are a propagandist. You think Ds are great cause they will get after those nasty rich people and give you free stuff.

When will you stop with your immature belief of....Ds Good.....Rs Bad....DUH!

 

[Pandora]

and if you were to feel that your employer were in violation of worker's rights legislation it would be the government suing your employer or you yourself. so you are paying your money for nothing except for lowest common denominator compensation. any initiative you personally might have to excel as a means to improve your situation is made moot as you are subject to whatever the worst performing worker can expect.

such a deal huh ?

I was very pleased to see Indiana made itself a right to work state. they too may now hope to see their fortu es im prove as have other right to work states. I'll never understand why any state would not crave being right to work.

I was happy to see what Indiana did too. Also, it’s a real crapper when your union takes 65 dollars a month in union dues then what they don’t spend sending themselves to Hawaii for "training" they donate to democrat candidates that I would never want in office and they also are big on donating to planned parenthood who I would never want a penny of my money going to.

NO one should ever be forced to join a union; every state should be a right to work state. The only time a liberal believes in choice is when it’s the choice to kill your baby, God forbid having a choice to join a union or not.

 

[Openmind]

I was happy to see what Indiana did too. Also, it’s a real crapper when your union takes 65 dollars a month in union dues then what they don’t spend sending themselves to Hawaii for "training" they donate to democrat candidates that I would never want in office and they also are big on donating to planned parenthood who I would never want a penny of my money going to.

NO one should ever be forced to join a union; every state should be a right to work state. The only time a liberal believes in choice is when it’s the choice to kill your baby, God forbid having a choice to join a union or not.

Sounds to me like you should find yourself a new job in anon-union shop.

Belly aching while benefitting from what you complain about is not only pointless, it's hypocritical.

After all, if you took a non-union job, you would save $65.00 a month (as per your statement) in dues! I wonder if that would compensate for lower salary, no representation, and lower fringe benefits?

 

[dogtowner]

Because its not good for the party or the nation to have leaders bought and paid for...thats what we have Republicans for.

so you are in favor of prohibiting unions from buying politicians too ?

 

[Openmind]

so you are in favor of prohibiting unions from buying politicians too ?

I am against every big group with unlimited amount of money buying politicians.

However, and we discussed this before, there is a huge difference with lobbying to buy politicians to affect the politics of law making to benefit a very small group of very wealthy people, and lobbying politicians to benefit the majority of workers (even those who are NOT unionize benefit from the Union's work).

 

[steveox]

I am against every big group with unlimited amount of money buying politicians.

However, and we discussed this before, there is a huge difference with lobbying to buy politicians to affect the politics of law making to benefit a very small group of very wealthy people, and lobbying politicians to benefit the majority of workers (even those who are NOT unionize benefit from the Union's work).

Even George Soros?

 

[dogtowner]

I am against every big group with unlimited amount of money buying politicians.

However, and we discussed this before, there is a huge difference with lobbying to buy politicians to affect the politics of law making to benefit a very small group of very wealthy people, and lobbying politicians to benefit the majority of workers (even those who are NOT unionize benefit from the Union's work).

unions represent a tiny group of workers and at the expense of all the non-union ones (Card Check is a wonderful example of this).

 

[Openmind]

unions represent a tiny group of workers and at the expense of all the non-union ones (Card Check is a wonderful example of this).

I would say that 11.9 millions workers is not exactly "tiny!"

I wonder if there are 11.9 millions wealthy corporate CEO's?

 

[Openmind]

Even George Soros?

I said anyone.

Although, at least Soros is siding with the majority of the people against the minority of wealth.