Well well well.

[Boris Norris]

All the evidence indicates the election was stolen and Democrats have not irrefutably proven the evidence does not show that.

You made the claim the election was stolen and like the onus of proof regarding your silly god is on you.

You have no evidence or stat decs. To prove anything. You're a liar.

 

[mark francis]

Excuse me dickhead. She did not uncover anything. Read the article I posted.
She like you is a lying fraud.

You need to wean yourself from, lying leftist media sources that exclusively support and promote anti-American politicians and policies.

 

[mark francis]

You made the claim the election was stolen and like the onus of proof regarding your silly god is on you.

You have no evidence or stat decs. To prove anything. You're a liar.

Nonsense. All the evidence indicates the election was stolen and if Democrats want to claim it was not stolen then they need to prove the evidence does not show that.

 

[Boris Norris]

Nonsense. All the evidence indicates the election was stolen and if Democrats want to claim it was not stolen then they need to prove the evidence does not show that.

I'll ask again, produce this evidence or shut up. You've been hammering away at this and even now Trump will be prosecuted and found guilty. You're still spewing out the same crap.

 

[pjmret]

Democrats and leftists who commit or who turn a blind eye to fraud have rules in place to prevent corrupted voting machines from being examined, thius all but guaranteeing fraud by voting machine will not be uncovered. Slick.

The federal government classifies voting systems as “critical infrastructure,” important to national security, and access to their software and other components is tightly regulated. In several instances since 2020, officials have taken machines out of service after their chains of custody were disrupted.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2022/08/15/sidney-powell-coffee-county-sullivan-strickler/

And that doesn't explain anything about redstate of course since democrats can't stop anything from happening there nor of course have you presented any credible evidence that these machines need to be examined anymore all you do is wine and wine and wine about democrats all day long

 

[pjmret]

Nonsense. All the evidence indicates the election was stolen and if Democrats want to claim it was not stolen then they need to prove the evidence does not show that.

No we've gone over this many times but you're just too stupid to learn that's not how life and courts work democrats don't need to prove it wasn't stolen republicans need to prove it was stolen and they have failed every single time because you guys are just plain morons

 

[mark francis]

I'll ask again, produce this evidence or shut up. You've been hammering away at this and even now Trump will be prosecuted and found guilty. You're still spewing out the same crap.

Democrats lie when they deny voter fraud. They lie when they claim dozens of judges have carefully examined the evidence of fraud and ruled that there was no fraud there. Here is why one judge rejected a voter fraud case and a snippet of what he said about the case:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/antrim-county-lawsuit/2021/05/18/e324451a-b802-11eb-a5fe-bb49dc89a248_story.html

Because of that, he said, the suit was moot, and he granted a motion to dismiss sought by Michigan’s secretary of state and the clerk of Antrim County.

During the hearing, Elsenheimer said he was not concluding whether the election data was “corrupted or corruptible,” a finding that he said was not possible with the information available to him and not required by law.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

States are under threat of lawsuits from Democrats and leftist voting machine owners and operators if they dare to try to examine a voting machine for possible 2020 fraud.

Pennsylvania County Will Refuse to Submit Voting Machines for Audit After Threat from Democratic Official (westernjournal.com)

Last week, Acting Secretary of State Veronica Degraffenreid, an appointee of Democratic Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf, issued an order ensuring counties could not cooperate with an election audit even if they wanted to.

“County Boards of Elections shall not provide physical, electronic, or internal access to third parties seeking to copy and/or conduct an examination of state-certified electronic voting systems, or any components of such systems, including but not limited to: election management software and systems, tabulators, scanners, counters, automatic tabulating equipment, voting devices, servers, ballot marking devices, paper ballot or ballot card printers, portable memory media devices (thumb drives, flash drives and the like), and any other hardware, software or devices being used as part of the election management system,” the order said.

And if any county were to be so bold as to defy the Democratic state administration and provide its voting machines for an election audit, it would pay the price.

 

[pjmret]

Democrats lie when they deny voter fraud. They lie when they claim dozens of judges have carefully examined the evidence of fraud and ruled that there was no fraud there. Here is why one judge rejected a voter fraud case and a snippet of what he said about the case:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/antrim-county-lawsuit/2021/05/18/e324451a-b802-11eb-a5fe-bb49dc89a248_story.html

Because of that, he said, the suit was moot, and he granted a motion to dismiss sought by Michigan’s secretary of state and the clerk of Antrim County.

During the hearing, Elsenheimer said he was not concluding whether the election data was “corrupted or corruptible,” a finding that he said was not possible with the information available to him and not required by law.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

States are under threat of lawsuits from Democrats and leftist voting machine owners and operators if they dare to try to examine a voting machine for possible 2020 fraud.

Pennsylvania County Will Refuse to Submit Voting Machines for Audit After Threat from Democratic Official (westernjournal.com)

Last week, Acting Secretary of State Veronica Degraffenreid, an appointee of Democratic Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf, issued an order ensuring counties could not cooperate with an election audit even if they wanted to.

“County Boards of Elections shall not provide physical, electronic, or internal access to third parties seeking to copy and/or conduct an examination of state-certified electronic voting systems, or any components of such systems, including but not limited to: election management software and systems, tabulators, scanners, counters, automatic tabulating equipment, voting devices, servers, ballot marking devices, paper ballot or ballot card printers, portable memory media devices (thumb drives, flash drives and the like), and any other hardware, software or devices being used as part of the election management system,” the order said.

And if any county were to be so bold as to defy the Democratic state administration and provide its voting machines for an election audit, it would pay the price.

Who said that dozens of judges have looked at evidence? but many have for sure, including in every state where a claim of fraud was brought.

But it is true that dozens of judges have dismissed your cases for many reasons

You morons lost every case and that's hard to do even for morons like you lol

 

[pjmret]

Democrats lie when they deny voter fraud. They lie when they claim dozens of judges have carefully examined the evidence of fraud and ruled that there was no fraud there. Here is why one judge rejected a voter fraud case and a snippet of what he said about the case:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/antrim-county-lawsuit/2021/05/18/e324451a-b802-11eb-a5fe-bb49dc89a248_story.html

Because of that, he said, the suit was moot, and he granted a motion to dismiss sought by Michigan’s secretary of state and the clerk of Antrim County.

During the hearing, Elsenheimer said he was not concluding whether the election data was “corrupted or corruptible,” a finding that he said was not possible with the information available to him and not required by law.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

States are under threat of lawsuits from Democrats and leftist voting machine owners and operators if they dare to try to examine a voting machine for possible 2020 fraud.

Pennsylvania County Will Refuse to Submit Voting Machines for Audit After Threat from Democratic Official (westernjournal.com)

Last week, Acting Secretary of State Veronica Degraffenreid, an appointee of Democratic Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf, issued an order ensuring counties could not cooperate with an election audit even if they wanted to.

“County Boards of Elections shall not provide physical, electronic, or internal access to third parties seeking to copy and/or conduct an examination of state-certified electronic voting systems, or any components of such systems, including but not limited to: election management software and systems, tabulators, scanners, counters, automatic tabulating equipment, voting devices, servers, ballot marking devices, paper ballot or ballot card printers, portable memory media devices (thumb drives, flash drives and the like), and any other hardware, software or devices being used as part of the election management system,” the order said.

And if any county were to be so bold as to defy the Democratic state administration and provide its voting machines for an election audit, it would pay the price.

Red states can't be sued by blue stated ***** duh

 

[pjmret]

Democrats lie when they deny voter fraud. They lie when they claim dozens of judges have carefully examined the evidence of fraud and ruled that there was no fraud there. Here is why one judge rejected a voter fraud case and a snippet of what he said about the case:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/antrim-county-lawsuit/2021/05/18/e324451a-b802-11eb-a5fe-bb49dc89a248_story.html

Because of that, he said, the suit was moot, and he granted a motion to dismiss sought by Michigan’s secretary of state and the clerk of Antrim County.

During the hearing, Elsenheimer said he was not concluding whether the election data was “corrupted or corruptible,” a finding that he said was not possible with the information available to him and not required by law.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

States are under threat of lawsuits from Democrats and leftist voting machine owners and operators if they dare to try to examine a voting machine for possible 2020 fraud.

Pennsylvania County Will Refuse to Submit Voting Machines for Audit After Threat from Democratic Official (westernjournal.com)

Last week, Acting Secretary of State Veronica Degraffenreid, an appointee of Democratic Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf, issued an order ensuring counties could not cooperate with an election audit even if they wanted to.

“County Boards of Elections shall not provide physical, electronic, or internal access to third parties seeking to copy and/or conduct an examination of state-certified electronic voting systems, or any components of such systems, including but not limited to: election management software and systems, tabulators, scanners, counters, automatic tabulating equipment, voting devices, servers, ballot marking devices, paper ballot or ballot card printers, portable memory media devices (thumb drives, flash drives and the like), and any other hardware, software or devices being used as part of the election management system,” the order said.

And if any county were to be so bold as to defy the Democratic state administration and provide its voting machines for an election audit, it would pay the price.

and of course if you let right wing morons do whatever they want to voting machines, they will have to be recertified which is an huge expense. "The order threatened that if a county were to allow an outside agency to audit its machines, “the Department of State will withdraw the certification or use authority for those pieces of the county voting system.”"

this article is so biased. its not a "threat", its how voting machines work. if random people access them, they are no longer certified.

you morons think you can just do whatever you want because your guy lost. lol

 

[pjmret]

Democrats lie when they deny voter fraud. They lie when they claim dozens of judges have carefully examined the evidence of fraud and ruled that there was no fraud there. Here is why one judge rejected a voter fraud case and a snippet of what he said about the case:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/antrim-county-lawsuit/2021/05/18/e324451a-b802-11eb-a5fe-bb49dc89a248_story.html

Because of that, he said, the suit was moot, and he granted a motion to dismiss sought by Michigan’s secretary of state and the clerk of Antrim County.

During the hearing, Elsenheimer said he was not concluding whether the election data was “corrupted or corruptible,” a finding that he said was not possible with the information available to him and not required by law.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

States are under threat of lawsuits from Democrats and leftist voting machine owners and operators if they dare to try to examine a voting machine for possible 2020 fraud.

Pennsylvania County Will Refuse to Submit Voting Machines for Audit After Threat from Democratic Official (westernjournal.com)

Last week, Acting Secretary of State Veronica Degraffenreid, an appointee of Democratic Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf, issued an order ensuring counties could not cooperate with an election audit even if they wanted to.

“County Boards of Elections shall not provide physical, electronic, or internal access to third parties seeking to copy and/or conduct an examination of state-certified electronic voting systems, or any components of such systems, including but not limited to: election management software and systems, tabulators, scanners, counters, automatic tabulating equipment, voting devices, servers, ballot marking devices, paper ballot or ballot card printers, portable memory media devices (thumb drives, flash drives and the like), and any other hardware, software or devices being used as part of the election management system,” the order said.

And if any county were to be so bold as to defy the Democratic state administration and provide its voting machines for an election audit, it would pay the price.

2. Third-Party Access to Electronic Voting Systems. Demands have been made to allow thirdparty entities not directly involved with the conduct of elections to have access to electronic votingsystems, specifically to review and copy the internal electronic, software, mechanical, logic, andrelated components of such systems. These demands have included the desire to image electronicmemory spaces, to download operating systems and software, and to copy information that isinternal and proprietary. Such access by third parties undermines chain of custody requirementsand strict access limitations necessary to prevent both intentional and inadvertent tampering withelectronic voting systems. It also jeopardizes the security and integrity of those systems and willnegate the ability of electronic voting system vendors to affirmatively state that such systemscontinue to meet Commonwealth security standards, are validated as not posing security risks, andPage 2 of 2are able to be certified to perform as designed by the electronic voting system vendor and ascertified by both the U.S. Election Assistance Commission and the Department of State.


your biased article "forgot" to mention the whole reason for the order. You morons don't understand anything about elections. lol

 

[mark francis]

Who said that dozens of judges have looked at evidence? but many have for sure, including in every state where a claim of fraud was brought.

But it is true that dozens of judges have dismissed your cases for many reasons

You morons lost every case and that's hard to do even for morons like you lol

This judge did not rule on voter fraud because there was insufficient evidence for him to make a ruling. He did not rule3 that he had examined enough evidence to safely declare that no fraud had occurred.

During the hearing, Elsenheimer said he was not concluding whether the election data was “corrupted or corruptible,” a finding that he said was not possible with the information available to him and not required by law.

 

[mark francis]

Red states can't be sued by blue stated ***** duh

It is not a matter of state suing state. It is a matter of bent elections officials suing anyone who dares defy their nationwide ban on inspecting voting machines.

 

[pjmret]

This judge did not rule on voter fraud because there was insufficient evidence for him to make a ruling. He did not rule3 that he had examined enough evidence to safely declare that no fraud had occurred.

During the hearing, Elsenheimer said he was not concluding whether the election data was “corrupted or corruptible,” a finding that he said was not possible with the information available to him and not required by law.

well list every court case and then we'll talk. cherry picking one case out of more than 60 is stupid. lol

 

[mark francis]

and of course if you let right wing morons do whatever they want to voting machines, they will have to be recertified which is an huge expense. "The order threatened that if a county were to allow an outside agency to audit its machines, “the Department of State will withdraw the certification or use authority for those pieces of the county voting system.”"

this article is so biased. its not a "threat", its how voting machines work. if random people access them, they are no longer certified.

you morons think you can just do whatever you want because your guy lost. lol

Democrats and crooked leftists refuse to allow inspections of voting machines they used in the 2020 election.