Well well well.

[pjmret]

It is not a matter of state suing state. It is a matter of bent elections officials suing anyone who dares defy their nationwide ban on inspecting voting machines.

what "nationwide ban" *****? lol

 

[pjmret]

Democrats and crooked leftists refuse to allow inspections of voting machines they used in the 2020 election.

how did they stop red states from doing that, *****?

 

[mark francis]

2. Third-Party Access to Electronic Voting Systems. Demands have been made to allow thirdparty entities not directly involved with the conduct of elections to have access to electronic votingsystems, specifically to review and copy the internal electronic, software, mechanical, logic, andrelated components of such systems. These demands have included the desire to image electronicmemory spaces, to download operating systems and software, and to copy information that isinternal and proprietary. Such access by third parties undermines chain of custody requirementsand strict access limitations necessary to prevent both intentional and inadvertent tampering withelectronic voting systems. It also jeopardizes the security and integrity of those systems and willnegate the ability of electronic voting system vendors to affirmatively state that such systemscontinue to meet Commonwealth security standards, are validated as not posing security risks, andPage 2 of 2are able to be certified to perform as designed by the electronic voting system vendor and ascertified by both the U.S. Election Assistance Commission and the Department of State.


your biased article "forgot" to mention the whole reason for the order. You morons don't understand anything about elections. lol

America should not allow elections officials to use machines that cannot be examined for corruption after an election marked by multiple allegations of corruption.

 

[pjmret]

Democrats and crooked leftists refuse to allow inspections of voting machines they used in the 2020 election.

apparently there was no credible evdience requiring insepctions, or judges could have ordered it.

you morons had no such evidence. lol

 

[mark francis]

well list every court case and then we'll talk. cherry picking one case out of more than 60 is stupid. lol

There is not a single court case in which the judge examined all the evidence and ruled that the evidence proves no fraud occurred.

 

[pjmret]

America should not allow elections officials to use machines that cannot be examined for corruption after an election marked by multiple allegations of corruption.

where does anything say they "can't be" inspected? of course they can be, but you have to follow a legal process.

right wing morons wanted to just show up and start "examining" machines because their guy lost.

you have to have credible evidence to do this kind of thing, *****.
not just be unhappy. duh

 

[mark francis]

what "nationwide ban" *****? lol

If Dominion machines are protected from examination by copyright or proprietary laws then that obstruction to investigations is nationwide.

 

[pjmret]

There is not a single court case in which the judge examined all the evidence and ruled that the evidence proves no fraud occurred.

yes you keep demonstrating how you are a legal ***** by repeating that stupidity. lol

and i keep pointing out how you are a ***** for doing it.

 

[mark francis]

how did they stop red states from doing that, *****?

Leftists have used the fear of being sued to prevent anyone from examining voting machines leftists claim are protected from examination by law.

 

[pjmret]

If Dominion machines are protected from examination by copyright or proprietary laws then that obstruction to investigations is nationwide.

so you are against copyright laws, *****?

 

[mark francis]

apparently there was no credible evdience requiring insepctions, or judges could have ordered it.

you morons had no such evidence. lol

Wrong assumption.

 

[pjmret]

Leftists have used the fear of being sued to prevent anyone from examining voting machines leftists claim are protected from examination by law.

which "leftists" 'claim" that, *****?

you mean..copyright law? or what? lol

leftists aren't in charge of copyright law, *****

 

[pjmret]

Wrong assumption.

nope, fact.

you lost every court case.
because you had no credible evidence.

 

[mark francis]

where does anything say they "can't be" inspected? of course they can be, but you have to follow a legal process.

right wing morons wanted to just show up and start "examining" machines because their guy lost.

you have to have credible evidence to do this kind of thing, *****.
not just be unhappy. duh

The laws protecting voting machines from examination were written by Democrats and leftists to prevent voter fraud opponents from examining voting machines after an election marked by major accusations of fraud.

 

[mark francis]

so you are against copyright laws, *****?

If copyright laws are abused by crooks to hide fraud, then yes, I am opposed to election officials using machines that are protected from inspections by copyright laws.