Well well well.

[pjmret]

If copyright laws are abused by crooks to hide fraud, then yes, I am opposed to election officials using machines that are protected from inspections by copyright laws.

copyright laws were "abused" by "crooke" prove it *****.

 

[pjmret]

The laws protecting voting machines from examination were written by Democrats and leftists to prevent voter fraud opponents from examining voting machines after an election marked by major accusations of fraud.

they were written by democrats and leftists? prove it.

 

[mark francis]

which "leftists" 'claim" that, *****?

you mean..copyright law? or what? lol

leftists aren't in charge of copyright law, *****

If there are no laws preventing voting machines from examination then Democrats made a huge blunder by not having all their machines examined immediately after the 2020 election to prove the machines had not been involved in election fraud.

 

[mark francis]

nope, fact.

you lost every court case.
because you had no credible evidence.

Americans lost every court case in which the judge declined to take up the case for whatever reason so that the evidence would not be presented and debated in open court. All Americans needed was for one court to have heard evidence of fraud in open court and for the judge to have to certify a jury judgment that found fraud was committed.

 

[pjmret]

If there are no laws preventing voting machines from examination then Democrats made a huge blunder by not having all their machines examined immediately after the 2020 election to prove the machines had not been involved in election fraud.

nope, no one is going to waste time and money to pander to you morons because you are butthurt.
you wouldn't believe anything no matter what unless it declared that trump won. lol.

you morons are like tantruming babies, and just get ignored until you stop crying. lol

 

[pjmret]

Americans lost every court case in which the judge declined to take up the case for whatever reason so that the evidence would not be presented and debated in open court.

cases like that aren't "debated in open court" *****. they aren't heard by juries, thats now how these cases work


god you're a true legal *****. and science *****. and general *****. lol

 

[mark francis]

they were written by democrats and leftists? prove it.

Republicans are not resisting inspections of questionable voting machines, Democrats are.

 

[mark francis]

cases like that aren't "debated in open court" *****. they aren't heard by juries, thats now how these cases work


god you're a true legal *****. and science *****. and general *****. lol

That's right. In the new Democrat Socialist American Order, no fraud cases will be aired in court, which is why judges refuse to hear them for fear of retribution by the bent leftist swamp creature mob.

 

[pjmret]

That's right. In the new Democrat Socialist American Order, no fraud cases will be aired in court, which is why judges refuse to hear them for fear of retribution by the bent leftist swamp creature mob.

no, that's how its always been *****. in red states too.
and judges heard every case, *****. duh

god you are totally clueless about the legal system. lol

 

[pjmret]

Republicans are not resisting inspections of questionable voting machines, Democrats are.

why weren't they inspected in red states then, *****?

oh because intelligent republicans resisted too. lol.

god you're stupid.

 

[mark francis]

no, that's how its always been *****. in red states too.
and judges heard every case, *****. duh

god you are totally clueless about the legal system. lol

No, courts did not hear fraud cases and no judge said voter fraud did not occur.

 

[mark francis]

why weren't they inspected in red states then, *****?

oh because intelligent republicans resisted too. lol.

god you're stupid.

Democrats threatened to sue anyone investigating voting machines and they proved it in Colorado.

 

[pjmret]

Democrats threatened to sue anyone investigating voting machines and they proved it in Colorado.

quote this "threat".

 

[pjmret]

No, courts did not hear fraud cases and no judge said voter fraud did not occur.

yes they did hear them ***** and of course that's not how courts work.

you must enjoy looking like a *****. i think you're an online masochist.

 

[Boris Norris]

Democrats lie when they deny voter fraud.

No it's you who deny the facts found by your own party. Suck eggs.

They lie when they claim dozens of judges have carefully examined the evidence of fraud and ruled that there was no fraud there.

No. The democrats didn't lie. Trumps minions approached the courts and we're laughed out. No Democrat did anything. You're a liar.

Here is why one judge rejected a voter fraud case and a snippet of what he said about the case:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/antrim-county-lawsuit/2021/05/18/e324451a-b802-11eb-a5fe-bb49dc89a248_story.html

Because of that, he said, the suit was moot,

Mootness, in American law: a point where further proceedings have lost practical significance.
Did you get that? Common language means is bullshit.

and he granted a motion to dismiss sought by Michigan’s secretary of state and the clerk of Antrim County.

And rightly so.

During the hearing, Elsenheimer said he was not concluding whether the election data was “corrupted or corruptible,” a finding that he said was not possible with the information available to him and not required by law.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

If it wasn't possible to prove how do you know it was corrupted?

you're inclusion of that clip proves you're a nutter. It confirms what I've been saying

States are under threat of lawsuits from Democrats and leftist voting machine owners and operators if they dare to try to examine a voting machine for possible 2020 fraud.

Which states are being pursued by democrat lawsuits? Are the same machines that gave Trump his win or were they replaced with left orientated ones specifically for that purpose.
Do you realise what a godbothering stupid prick you are? Keep away from priests.

Pennsylvania County Will Refuse to Submit Voting Machines for Audit After Threat from Democratic Official (westernjournal.com)

Last week, Acting Secretary of State Veronica Degraffenreid, an appointee of Democratic Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf, issued an order ensuring counties could not cooperate with an election audit even if they wanted to.

note, " could not" even if they wanted to? Ring any bells dickhead.

“County Boards of Elections shall not provide physical, electronic, or internal access to third parties seeking to copy and/or conduct an examination of state-certified electronic voting systems, or any components of such systems, including but not limited to: election management software and systems, tabulators, scanners, counters, automatic tabulating equipment, voting devices, servers, ballot marking devices, paper ballot or ballot card printers, portable memory media devices (thumb drives, flash drives and the like), and any other hardware, software or devices being used as part of the election management system,” the order said.

that's the law boy. Got some issues with it?

And if any county were to be so bold as to defy the Democratic state administration and provide its voting machines for an election audit, it would pay the price.

Exactly and so it should. That same state law existed all over the country. The stupidity of giving govt equipment to some redneck treasonous terrorists to destroy. Fuck off. Dickhead. All because Trump lost.