What should the U.S. do if we discovered that Ukraine's government was seriously corrupt?

I am sympathetic to what you might be feeling right now.

You want to think well of our men and women in blue.

But, the indications are that they were following the orders of the House Speaker, aka the Mayor of Capitol Hill.

Remember that Speaker Nancy Pelosi tore up Trump's State of the Union speech and threw it on the floor.

She wanted Trump out of office, never to return.

She knew the President would draw tens of thousands to his rally to stop the steal and that they would head to the Capitol.

She could have had Police steer or direct the crowd away from the Capitol.

She could have barricaded the Capitol.

She could have requested National Guard troops to be there to protect the Capitol building and those who were within it.

She did NONE of these things.

She allowed the peaceful protesters to assemble directly next to the Capitol building. And she would show the World that Trump "had staged an insurrection."

But when the law abiding patriotically minded peaceful protesters did not act in a way to bring discredit to Trump or the MAGA movement, Nancy gave the Police the order to use stun grenades to incite the crowd into violence and prompt them to behave in the predicted violent and angry manner the media has portrayed them to have been.

That false portrayal resulted in many Americans believing that Trump and his supporters are traitors and revolters.

But, the more you look into the J6 protest, the more you will see which will make you question the Democrat and the dishonest media narrative.

And then you will wonder wtf has happened to our country?!
I don't agree with most of your post. Yes, I certainly agree that Pelosi had no respect for Trump and made a stupid scene.


"Security is shared, it is not solely the responsibility of the Speaker. Security is provided by the sergeant-at-arms of the House, the sergeant-at-arms of the Senate and the Capitol Police. The House sergeant-at-arms reports to the House speaker, Pelosi. The Senate sergeant-at-arms reports to the Senate majority leader, McConnell. The Capitol Police is overseen by a four-member board that includes both sergeants-at-arms.

News reports indicate that before the attack, the House sergeant-at-arms resisted calls from the Capitol Police to bring in the National Guard for extra security at the Capitol because of "optics," but he later said intelligence reports didn’t warrant the extra security.

The chain of command for Capitol security does include Pelosi, but it does not fall solely to her. Others in the chain of command include the Senate majority leader and the Capitol police chief. "



What you are essentially saying is that both Pelosi and McConnell should have micromanaged the security by looking at the intelligence reports and making an assessment of the force required. They entrusted it to the The House sergeant-at-arms, Senate sergeant-at-arms, and Capitol Police Chief, who all resigned in disgrace.

The heads of the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers came prepared to invade the Capitol, were tried and found guilty. I also wonder wtf has happened to our country.
 
Werbung:
I don't agree with most of your post. Yes, I certainly agree that Pelosi had no respect for Trump and made a stupid scene.


"Security is shared, it is not solely the responsibility of the Speaker. Security is provided by the sergeant-at-arms of the House, the sergeant-at-arms of the Senate and the Capitol Police. The House sergeant-at-arms reports to the House speaker, Pelosi. The Senate sergeant-at-arms reports to the Senate majority leader, McConnell. The Capitol Police is overseen by a four-member board that includes both sergeants-at-arms.

News reports indicate that before the attack, the House sergeant-at-arms resisted calls from the Capitol Police to bring in the National Guard for extra security at the Capitol because of "optics," but he later said intelligence reports didn’t warrant the extra security.

The chain of command for Capitol security does include Pelosi, but it does not fall solely to her. Others in the chain of command include the Senate majority leader and the Capitol police chief. "



What you are essentially saying is that both Pelosi and McConnell should have micromanaged the security by looking at the intelligence reports and making an assessment of the force required. They entrusted it to the The House sergeant-at-arms, Senate sergeant-at-arms, and Capitol Police Chief, who all resigned in disgrace.

The heads of the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers came prepared to invade the Capitol, were tried and found guilty. I also wonder wtf has happened to our country.
I am impeaching or discrediting your source's objectivity. This is intentionally misleading.

It illustrates what President Trump once said, "Everything woke turns to shxx."

"The attack left five people dead, including a Capitol Police officer, whose death the following day is still under investigation."

The only person killed that day was protester, Ashli Babbitt, who was murdered by a Police Lt. who took aim and lit her up.
 
I don't agree with most of your post. Yes, I certainly agree that Pelosi had no respect for Trump and made a stupid scene.


"Security is shared, it is not solely the responsibility of the Speaker. Security is provided by the sergeant-at-arms of the House, the sergeant-at-arms of the Senate and the Capitol Police. The House sergeant-at-arms reports to the House speaker, Pelosi. The Senate sergeant-at-arms reports to the Senate majority leader, McConnell. The Capitol Police is overseen by a four-member board that includes both sergeants-at-arms.

News reports indicate that before the attack, the House sergeant-at-arms resisted calls from the Capitol Police to bring in the National Guard for extra security at the Capitol because of "optics," but he later said intelligence reports didn’t warrant the extra security.

The chain of command for Capitol security does include Pelosi, but it does not fall solely to her. Others in the chain of command include the Senate majority leader and the Capitol police chief. "



What you are essentially saying is that both Pelosi and McConnell should have micromanaged the security by looking at the intelligence reports and making an assessment of the force required. They entrusted it to the The House sergeant-at-arms, Senate sergeant-at-arms, and Capitol Police Chief, who all resigned in disgrace.

The heads of the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers came prepared to invade the Capitol, were tried and found guilty. I also wonder wtf has happened to our country.
If the job of those in charge was to prevent this from happening, why would voters want those types of people in charge of Capitol security?
 
I am impeaching or discrediting your source's objectivity. This is intentionally misleading.

It illustrates what President Trump once said, "Everything woke turns to shxx."

"The attack left five people dead, including a Capitol Police officer, whose death the following day is still under investigation."
I don't understand your point. The hierarchy of control of Capitol security is a fact that can be looked up. The site I gave has all kinds of references. I don't see how "woke" has anything to do with it. I have no quarrel with your last sentence.

If the job of those in charge was to prevent this from happening, why would voters want those types of people in charge of Capitol security?
I think Pelosi and McConnel should not be in charge of security and try to keep track of intelligence to foresee security problems.

The leaders of the house and senate should not have to micromanage security.
 
I don't understand your point. The hierarchy of control of Capitol security is a fact that can be looked up. The site I gave has all kinds of references. I don't see how "woke" has anything to do with it. I have no quarrel with your last sentence.


I think Pelosi and McConnel should not be in charge of security and try to keep track of intelligence to foresee security problems.

The leaders of the house and senate should not have to micromanage security.
A tiresome tendency I encounter when exchanging posts with Democrats is that the MAIN OBJECTIVE often gets lost in the process.

And everything you say may be true, but the bottom line is that Trump and his supporters are left with an indelible stain, a false label of traitors and coup d'etat plotters because those dimwits were entrusted with power and they cant get it right on J6. But they get it right for inauguration day?

Anyone who loves America should expect and demand better.

By the way, you can use this on others for a laugh.

Do it yourself instant home test kit to tell if you hate America or love America!

If you love America, you will love this (17:59) video.

 
If I thought so lowly of anyone, especially a POTUS, as you do of Trump, I would want to be sure my opinion of him wasnt being fed to me by dishonest people and entities which have well known biases against him.

When Trump said he was going to drain the swamp and end corruption, didn't you understand that meant depriving many rich and powerful people preying on us all and our nation, depriving them of billions in revenue? Didn't you realize that meant sending people to jail where they belong?




View attachment 2180

Or maybe you didn't know that these corrupt people controlled the media as well as all the other major industries?

View attachment 2181



What do you think these people would do if threatened with financial ruin or imprisonment?

View attachment 2182




They would trick you into attacking your only champion and making HIM seem like the bad guy.

EDITORIALS

Media Trump Hatred Shows In 92% Negative Coverage Of His Presidency: Study

06:10 PM ET 10/10/2018

Anti-Trump Media: To say that the big networks haven't exactly had a love affair with Donald Trump, as they plainly did with President Obama, is an understatement. A new survey shows that not only is coverage of Trump overwhelmingly negative, but the president's biggest accomplishment — the roaring economy — gets almost no attention.

For its report, the Media Research Center did a lot of visual spadework. It viewed some 1,007 evening news stories about the Trump White House on ABC, CBS and NBC from June 1 to Sept. 30. That's the equivalent of about 32.7 hours of coverage, by TV standards an eternity of news time.

What they found was, as Trump himself might say, sad: "Over the summer, the broadcast networks have continued to pound Donald Trump and his team with the most hostile coverage of a president in TV news history — 92% negative, vs. just 8% positive."

Moreover, the very focus of what the media cover is highly selective. Some two-thirds of the Trump coverage came from five topics, including the Russia investigation, immigration, the Brett Kavanaugh nomination, North Korea, and U.S.-Russia relations.

Let's see, whatmissing from that 's list? Oh yes, the one thing that's overwhelmingly positive for President Trump: the economy.

What About The Economy?

Over the four months the MRC watched network TV for all of us, less than 1% of the coverage was on the economy. To be more precise, it was 0.7% of the entire coverage, or 14 minutes. We're in the middle of an economic boom we were told by the very same media people was impossible, but now this miracle doesn't warrant coverage.

Let's just review a little, shall we? The third quarter saw 4.2% GDP growth, and Trump's average is now 3%. Wages are rising, and real median household incomes are now at their highest level ever. As for September's overall unemployment rate of 3.7%, it was the lowest in nearly half a century. Meanwhile, unemployment rates for African Americans, Hispanics and Asians are at or near all-time lows.

Look at the late Obama economy and the early Trump economy, and it's like a light went on. Suddenly, businesses were starting up, creating jobs, raising pay, building, buying and selling at a fevered pace.

Tax Cuts And Deregulation

Even many economists on the left have grudgingly agreed that Trump's tax cuts and deregulation set a fire under a stone-cold economy, with some 1.8 million new jobs created in just 21 months. Yet, as far as the network media are concerned, the recovery doesn't really exist. Imagine all this good news happening under President Obama. We would hear the media's hosannas on each and every nightly newscast.

Well, there was one economy-related issue that did pique the networks' interest, and rightly so: Trump's use of tariffs to get other countries to renegotiate unfair trade deals. It received 80 minutes of coverage but, again, not balanced at all: 88% was negative.

We say this because the media are in crisis as never before. They fixate on the president's approval numbers, which are now over 40%, but apparently don't look at their own. In a recent Gallup poll of Americans' confidence in its main institutions, only 20% said they have a "great deal" or "quite a lot" of confidence in TV news. They're even below newspapers, for which only 23% said they had confidence.

Media In Crisis

If the media want to feel good about themselves, there's this: The bottom-dweller in the confidence poll was once again Congress, with only 11% claiming a "great deal/quite a lot" of confidence.

Unfortunately, the Fourth Estate seems eager to relinquish its claim to fairness, balance, evenhandedness and factual truth. Instead, it embraces the increasingly far-left politics of the progressive wing of the Democratic Party, which has recently veered into socialist territory by pushing Medicare for All, open borders, worker control of corporations, and a host of other crazy ideas that would bring ruin and falling living standards to America.

There was a time when the media at least made an attempt to be fair to both sides in the political debate. Sadly, that time is now dead and gone. And it shows in the contempt many American now have for the media. Even so, don't shed a tear for the media's seriously tarnished reputation: They've brought it on themselves



Anti-Trump Media? 92% Of Coverage Of His Presidency Is Negative: Study | Investor's Business Daily
www.investors.com › politics › editorials


trump "drained the swamp" by..hiring his own family.
hahahah
hahahha
hahahah

god you're so stupid.
 
The Ukraine is the 3rd most corrupted nation in the world . Thats one reason Hunter was there


third most? uh, no, *****. lol.
 
trump "drained the swamp" by..hiring his own family.
hahahah
hahahha
hahahah

god you're so stupid.
Well none of them had criminal records like several of joes picks did and do now . none of then dress like women when they were born with mens plumbing none of them prefer Soviet style banking . none of them were paid none of then have been accused of crimes like joes family and facing federal charges.
Dont fear ricky retardo biden refilled the swamp with perverts and idiots criminals and commies for you so it will feel like your back home in doofusdork.
 
trump "drained the swamp" by..hiring his own family.
hahahah
hahahha
hahahah

god you're so stupid.
Does the Trump family have the ability to steal a General election and prevent a recount and then frame the innocent election candidate such that 50% of the nation's voters are made to believe the victim of the stolen election was some evil guy?


If Trump or his family can't do all of that, then Trump is the better POTUS candidate.
 
Well none of them had criminal records like several of joes picks did and do now . none of then dress like women when they were born with mens plumbing none of them prefer Soviet style banking . none of them were paid none of then have been accused of crimes like joes family and facing federal charges.
Dont fear ricky retardo biden refilled the swamp with perverts and idiots criminals and commies for you so it will feel like your back home in doofusdork.

ROGER STONE​

Roger Stone, Trump’s longtime friend and adviser, was convicted of lying under oath to lawmakers investigating Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election.

PAUL MANAFORT​

Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort was found guilty of tax fraud and bank fraud in a jury trial in August 2018. A month later, he pleaded guilty to conspiracy charges related to money laundering, lobbying violations and witness tampering.

MICHAEL COHEN​

Trump’s former personal lawyer is serving a three-year prison sentence at home due to the coronavirus pandemic. He pleaded guilty in August 2018 to crimes including orchestrating ‘hush money’ payments before the 2016 election to women who had said they had sexual encounters with Trump.

MICHAEL FLYNN​

The retired Army lieutenant general served as Trump’s national security adviser for less than a month in 2017. He pleaded guilty that year to lying to the FBI about his interactions with Russia’s ambassador to the United States in the weeks before Trump took office.

RICK GATES​

The former deputy chairman of Trump’s campaign pleaded guilty in February 2018 to conspiracy against the United States and lying to investigators.

GEORGE NADER​

George Nader, an informal Trump adviser on foreign policy and witness in the Mueller investigation, was sentenced in June to 10 years in prison by a federal judge in Virginia. He pleaded guilty to possessing child pornography and bringing a boy to the United States for sex.

GEORGE PAPADOPOULOS​

The former Trump campaign adviser was sentenced in September 2018 to 14 days in prison after pleading guilty in October 2017 to lying to the FBI about his contacts with Russian officials and a Maltese professor who told him the Russians had “dirt” on Clinton.



Steve Bannon has been charged with defrauding Trump supporters in a campaign to help build the president’s signature wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, prosecutors said on Thursday.



A jury in New York on Tuesday found the Trump Organization guilty of all charges in a sweeping, 15-year tax fraud scheme that prosecutors said was orchestrated by top executives at the company.


hahahahahah
 
Does the Trump family have the ability to steal a General election and prevent a recount and then frame the innocent election candidate such that 50% of the nation's voters are made to believe the victim of the stolen election was some evil guy?


If Trump or his family can't do all of that, then Trump is the better POTUS candidate.


fortunately the republican attempt to steal the election failed.
 
proof? can you show some examples of where they have intentionally been wrong?

Every day, instead of going back to the ideas, ideals and principles which we know worked well right after WWII to make and keep America strong, Politico and others, promote less well proven ideas.

And because their positions (Politico's AND the DNC's) haven't resulted in disastrous failures which they would be forced to live with or publicly acknowledge, these losing Left Wing entities feel free to act as though everything is fine.

 
Werbung:
Every day, instead of going back to the ideas, ideals and principles which we know worked well right after WWII to make and keep America strong, Politico and others, promote less well proven ideas.

And because their positions (Politico's AND the DNC's) haven't resulted in disastrous failures which they would be forced to live with or publicly acknowledge, these losing Left Wing entities feel free to act as though everything is fine.


so no proof politifact is wrong. thanks for agreeing with me!
 
Back
Top