White People Are The Only Ones That Can End Racism

[mark francis]

No. Because it was bipartisan. So you can stop this dishonest tactic.

If democrats were not blameworthy for laws passed over decades that you claimed were unjustly harming blacks, then who was to be blamed for the laws if they were really as bad as you claim?

 

[mad1961]

Let's just say black nationalist BLM members support the idea that black lives matter above all others.

That's untrue. Disingenuous wite racists are making false claims. Some whites are a part of BLM. BM is not a black nationalist organization. Furthermore, black nationalism comes from a completely different place than white nationalist supremacy. Blac nationalism is about taking responsibility for the resources in the black community. Not the elimination or subordination of whites. This is the premise you racists have with trying to conflating words from blacks and giving them the same as what white supremacists believe.

God-honoring, God-pleasing Christians have never thought blacks are inferior to other races of humans.

Actually, they did and there are milions who still do.

Just because one or more godless white gives one or more blacks the impression that they stupidly think blacks are inferior is no justification for hating and slandering all whites.

It's more than 1 or 2, and you know that. Not all whites are being slandered, so you can stop playing the victim because you don't like your behavior called out. You have been the first to try using a singular black person as a representation for all lacks. So stop whining because you will get no pity here.

Those who accuse me of racism should have the decency to attempt to prove their allegations against me, not just assume that because such an accusation came into their head somehow it must be true.

After 64 years of facing white racism, it's apparent when you see it. The first thing is you trying to tell me how something came into my head, and not that I am able to see racism when it's there due to a lifetime of facing it. You white supremacists don't seem t understand that.

 

[mad1961]

If democrats were not blameworthy for laws passed over decades that you claimed were unjustly harming blacks, then who was to be blamed for the laws if they were really as bad as you claim?

Republicans and Democrats are complicit. Do you understand?

 

[mad1961]

Blacks captured and sold slaves in Africa. Peoples of multiple nations bought and sold slaves in America and elsewhere. No more than 2% of all whites ever bought and sold slaves in America. Demonizing a whole race of modern whites because a trickle few whites traded in slaves long ago is stupid and wrong.

Things didn't exactly happen as you claimed.

Africans did NOT sell their own people into slavery,

Africans did not sell their own people into slavery

www.africaw.com

Schomburg Center for the Research of Black Culture “The Abolition of the Slave Trade-African Resistance.”
https://wayback.archive-it.org/13235/20200727201752/http://abolition.nypl.org/home/

Now, once again, things didn't end when slavery ended, and it continues today. So you can drop the dumb racist repetition of somebody blaming modern whites fr the things past whites did. Especially because what the past whites did created the things modern whites have now.

More than 2 percent participated in slavery, and generations benefited from slavery, Jim Crow, and now modern white racism. It is time you stopped playing this stupid game, white man. You are being held to account for your racism, and whites are being held to account for the cumulative effects of now 249 years of continuing the same racism whites practiced from the beginning.

 

[Starcastle]

Still waiting on the explanation for why a nation of fanatically racist white people would be allowing black and brown people in here to make salaries over $100,000. Mad claimed that Asian income was distorted because of H1 visas.

H1 Visas were established in the 1990 immigration bills and voted for almost entirely by whites in the US congress and senate. The senate vote for that bill was 89-8 for it with 3 no votes.

 

[mark francis]

That's untrue. Disingenuous wite racists are making false claims. Some whites are a part of BLM. BM is not a black nationalist organization. Furthermore, black nationalism comes from a completely different place than white nationalist supremacy. Blac nationalism is about taking responsibility for the resources in the black community. Not the elimination or subordination of whites. This is the premise you racists have with trying to conflating words from blacks and giving them the same as what white supremacists believe.

I don't believe that BLM is an organization that promotes peace among all races of people. If it was about all Americans then why the focus on black lives only?

Actually, they did and there are milions who still do.
It's more than 1 or 2, and you know that. Not all whites are being slandered, so you can stop playing the victim because you don't like your behavior called out. You have been the first to try using a singular black person as a representation for all lacks. So stop whining because you will get no pity here.

How have you been able to demonstrate the difference between your respect for the 1 or 2 whites you say you respect and the millions of whites you do not respect?

After 64 years of facing white racism, it's apparent when you see it. The first thing is you trying to tell me how something came into my head, and not that I am able to see racism when it's there due to a lifetime of facing it. You white supremacists don't seem t understand that.

After decades of having been told the boogey man is after them there is no changing their minds now.

 

[mark francis]

Republicans and Democrats are complicit. Do you understand?

So you criticize all politicians for multiple past decades of laws and policies you judge as being racist? Are even black politicians guilty of racism in your special opinion?

 

[mark francis]

Things didn't exactly happen as you claimed.

Africans did NOT sell their own people into slavery,

How did the trade in enslaved people affect African societies? - BBC Bitesize

Learn how the trade in enslaved people brought power to some African rulers and societies, but robbed the continent of many of its people, and contributed to famine, instability and loss of culture with this Bitesize National 5 History revision guide.

www.bbc.co.uk

Slavery had existed in West Africa long before the Europeans arrived there.

Prisoners of war captured in battles between rival kingdoms or tribes were commonly kept and enslaved. These enslaved people could be put to work in mines or even put to death in religious rituals.

European slave traders seldom captured and enslaved African people by themselves. The terrain was too difficult and the kingdoms that ruled these parts of Africa were often too strong for a handful of white slavers to fight. Most enslaved people were sold to the Europeans by other Africans.

African states such as Ashanti (in modern day-Ghana) traded enslaved people in exchange for goods – such as textiles, alcohol, and guns.

They then used their new resources to become more powerful and to fight wars against their neighbours. This meant they could capture more people to enslave, and their society could grow stronger and wealthier.

 

[mark francis]

Things didn't exactly happen as you claimed.

Now, once again, things didn't end when slavery ended, and it continues today. So you can drop the dumb racist repetition of somebody blaming modern whites fr the things past whites did. Especially because what the past whites did created the things modern whites have now.

You seem to be claiming that anyone in America today, whether white or black, who enjoys some wealth accumulation owes his accumulation of wealth to slavery, thus labelling all modern Americans living above a medium income as racists whether they know that or not. So much for the idea that modern kids can go to college, get good jobs and earn a certain level of wealth without automatically making themselves racists because there are numerous blacks who don't do that.

 

[mark francis]

More than 2 percent participated in slavery, and generations benefited from slavery, Jim Crow, and now modern white racism. It is time you stopped playing this stupid game, white man. You are being held to account for your racism, and whites are being held to account for the cumulative effects of now 249 years of continuing the same racism whites practiced from the beginning.

Why condemn only whites over the decades for accumulating wealth in America as if hard work and responsible living do not help create wealth in America but, instead, all wealth in America exists because of white racism?

 

[mark francis]

More than 2 percent participated in slavery, and generations benefited from slavery, Jim Crow, and now modern white racism. It is time you stopped playing this stupid game, white man. You are being held to account for your racism, and whites are being held to account for the cumulative effects of now 249 years of continuing the same racism whites practiced from the beginning.

Even in the deeply racist democrat south only about 30% of families owned slaves. Does that mean the other 60% were not racist and did not own slaves? Does that mean the 95% of northerners who did not own slaves were not racists? What about the tens of thousands of Christian abolitionists and the hundreds of thousands of Americans who lost their lives in the war to free slaves? Do they deserve the disrespect of modern blacks who hate all whites without respect to facts?

https://brainly.com/question/51884396

Upload your school material for a more relevant answer
ccording to the Census of 1860, 30.8 percent of the free families in the confederacy owned slaves.

That means that every third white person in those states had a direct commitment to slavery.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

No. Biology is far more complicated than that. From his award-winning research in DNA, Crick came up with the aliens in spaceships alternative because he knew for a fact that life could not possibly have spontaneously generated on earth.

Early Darwinists foolishly believed a lot of things, one of them being that backwards African natives were excellent examples of the progressive growth of humans from animals, coming from the area of earth where the animals first developed into black Africans.

I don't agree. I think the most fantastical assumption is that humans and eggplants descended from the same ancient ancestor.

Eggplants and humans share some of the same DNA. That is not a assumption, that is a FACT.

 

[the annoying thing]

No. Because it was bipartisan. So you can stop this dishonest tactic.

democrats were all for slavery

The transatlantic slave trade involved various parties, including:
Portuguese and Spanish: The first European nations to initiate the slave trade in the 15th century, with Portugal being the first to transport enslaved Africans to the Americas.
2
European Slave Traders: They gathered and imprisoned enslaved Africans on the African coast and then transported them to the Americas.
1
African Chiefs: Many Africans were sold by local African or African-European dealers, rather than directly by European traders.
1
Governments and Empires: Countries like Spain and Britain established agreements to control the trade, such as the Asiento de negros, which allowed them to supply enslaved Africans to their colonies.
2

Overall, the trade was a complex network involving multiple actors, including African leaders, European traders, and colonial governments.


4 Sources

 

[the annoying thing]

Eggplants and humans share some of the same DNA. That is not a assumption, that is a FACT.

and you share a lot with that egg plant dont you dumbass

 

[mad1961]

democrats were all for slavery

The transatlantic slave trade involved various parties, including:
Portuguese and Spanish: The first European nations to initiate the slave trade in the 15th century, with Portugal being the first to transport enslaved Africans to the Americas.
2
European Slave Traders: They gathered and imprisoned enslaved Africans on the African coast and then transported them to the Americas.
1
African Chiefs: Many Africans were sold by local African or African-European dealers, rather than directly by European traders.
1
Governments and Empires: Countries like Spain and Britain established agreements to control the trade, such as the Asiento de negros, which allowed them to supply enslaved Africans to their colonies.
2

Overall, the trade was a complex network involving multiple actors, including African leaders, European traders, and colonial governments.


4 Sources

More disingenuous BS. I know what the African slave trade involved. From the white man's and Africans' perspective. You don't.

The narrative of the African running up to whites on the African coast yelling, “We got slaves for sale,” is untrue. If I buy drugs from a drug dealer, it is not the drug dealer’s fault that I became an addict. I chose to purchase the drugs. In the same way, Europeans decided to invade Africa and purchase African war captives. I have not been able to find research whereby Africans loaded up slave vessels that landed in Europe to sell slaves. I see no record of any West African shipping company that sailed the Atlantic, dropping off slaves in South America, the Caribbean, and then America.

Things are not as simple as “Africans sold other Africans into slavery.” It is not as simple as blacks invented slavery, and that we should be forever grateful to whites for being so kind as to end it. I was told as a child that half the truth equals a lie. Half the truth is what the tale of Africans selling other Africans is. You cannot make a sale if no one buys. I learned that the hard way years ago while trying to sell insurance. Africans did not own the shipping companies that carried the slaves to America, nor did they swim across the Atlantic to get here. And I repeat, Africans did not make U.S. laws.