Why did the Justice Department never charge Biden for illegally storing highly classified documents at his home for decades?

Show the evidence of that.
The Democrat two-tiered system of justice perversion is attracting the attention of SCOTUS justices who clearly see the injustice of current Democrat prosecutions of rioters that has been much more severe and involves the utilization of laws specially interpreted against non-Democrats but rarely ever against Democrats.


Takeaways from the Supreme Court’s arguments over obstruction charge used against January 6 rioters | CNN Politics 4-16-24

Takeaways from the Supreme Court’s arguments over obstruction charge used against January 6 rioters

Conservatives ask about left-wing protests

There was a heavy dose of “whataboutism” from the conservative justices, who repeatedly brought up left-wing protests while pressing both sides about exactly which conduct they believed would – and wouldn’t – be covered by the felony obstruction law.

Justice Neil Gorsuch posed several hypotheticals to Prelogar, asking if prosecutors could use the law to charge someone who participated in a sit-in that disrupted a trial “at a federal courthouse” or who was caught “pulling a fire alarm before a vote” in Congress.

He didn’t mention Rep. Jamaal Bowman by name, but the allusion to the New York Democrat was clear: He pulled the fire alarm shortly before a critical vote on a government funding bill in September. Bowman later pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor offense and was censured by the House.

Justice Samuel Alito brought up the disruptions at the Golden Gate Bridge that occurred Monday. Pro-Palestinian protesters, angry about Israel’s war against Hamas in the Gaza Strip, blocked rush-hour traffic, leading to more than 30 arrests.

“What if something similar to that happened all around the Capitol so that … all the bridges from Virginia were blocked and members from Virginia who needed to appear at a hearing couldn’t get there, or were delayed in getting there?” Alito asked. “Would that be a violation of this provision?”

Prelogar differentiated those cases by pointing out that January 6 was a far more aggressive and multi-pronged assault, with direct aims to shut down a specific proceeding. She said many of the January 6 rioters violently breached multiple police lines, brought tactical gear and weapons, and made explicit threats before arriving in DC.
 
Werbung:
The Democrat two-tiered system of justice perversion is attracting the attention of SCOTUS justices who clearly see the injustice of current Democrat prosecutions of rioters that has been much more severe and involves the utilization of laws specially interpreted against non-Democrats but rarely ever against Democrats.


Takeaways from the Supreme Court’s arguments over obstruction charge used against January 6 rioters | CNN Politics 4-16-24

Takeaways from the Supreme Court’s arguments over obstruction charge used against January 6 rioters

Conservatives ask about left-wing protests

There was a heavy dose of “whataboutism” from the conservative justices, who repeatedly brought up left-wing protests while pressing both sides about exactly which conduct they believed would – and wouldn’t – be covered by the felony obstruction law.

Justice Neil Gorsuch posed several hypotheticals to Prelogar, asking if prosecutors could use the law to charge someone who participated in a sit-in that disrupted a trial “at a federal courthouse” or who was caught “pulling a fire alarm before a vote” in Congress.

He didn’t mention Rep. Jamaal Bowman by name, but the allusion to the New York Democrat was clear: He pulled the fire alarm shortly before a critical vote on a government funding bill in September. Bowman later pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor offense and was censured by the House.

Justice Samuel Alito brought up the disruptions at the Golden Gate Bridge that occurred Monday. Pro-Palestinian protesters, angry about Israel’s war against Hamas in the Gaza Strip, blocked rush-hour traffic, leading to more than 30 arrests.

“What if something similar to that happened all around the Capitol so that … all the bridges from Virginia were blocked and members from Virginia who needed to appear at a hearing couldn’t get there, or were delayed in getting there?” Alito asked. “Would that be a violation of this provision?”

Prelogar differentiated those cases by pointing out that January 6 was a far more aggressive and multi-pronged assault, with direct aims to shut down a specific proceeding. She said many of the January 6 rioters violently breached multiple police lines, brought tactical gear and weapons, and made explicit threats before arriving in DC.
But they didn't. Move on.
 
Somebody twisted something to claim the leftist protest was mostly peaceful while standing in front of burning buildings after injured cops had been taken to the emergency room for being hit in the head with bricks.
Most twisting of the truth is done by twisted old farts like you.
 
Of course. That is how the two-tiered Democrat system of injustice works. Such systems are similar to Nazi persecution of Jews 80 years ago or Southern Democrat persecution of blacks more than 100 years ago.
There is no two tiered system. Again, Biden was investigated and exonerated. Trump stole the docs and refused to return them.
It's easier to fool someone than to convince them they have been fooled.
 
There is no two tiered system. Again, Biden was investigated and exonerated. Trump stole the docs and refused to return them.
It's easier to fool someone than to convince them they have been fooled.
The mob examined their boss and found him innocent. The mob also found cause to murder the boss of a rival mob. The Democrat mob operates according to mob rules.
 
Werbung:
Back
Top