Great news for Arizona

I believe you have a very warped idea of morality.
In fact, based on most of your posts, I would say that your idea of morality is just about diametrically opposed to my idea of morality:
It is not moral for people inheriting or earning through no work of their own many $millions a year while other, including veterans, people with disability, elderly and children don't have a roof over their heads and go to bed hungry.
It is not moral to force a woman to carry to term a fetus when she knows full well she will not be able to provide for another child, and no one helps her provide for the children whom she already has at home, so that they have no future.
It is not moral to use people to make more money by forcing them to pay huge interest rates on "payday loans."
It is not moral to demean, make fun and disregard the suffering of people who have less then you, or to insist that it is "their fault" because "they don't work enough" when they cannot make ends meet.
It is not moral for churches to pry on the poorest in their community or for evangelical preacher to trick poor people in sending them their last penny, through lies and fearmongering.
It is not moral to condemn Islam without looking at the horrors of Christianity. . .all religions (except maybe Buddhism. . . which is not really a religion) are guilty of horrors in the name of "God," while in fact, those horrors are committed by MEN.
It is not moral to pretend that only people agreeing with your narrow view of "patriotism" and "morality" are "moral."

More absurdity from someone who is so far out in left field she is incapable of EVER accepting the truth.

So, we can conclude from your post that you think it is not immoral to kill your unborn child or expect someone else to support you...or any of the other items I posted. Yes, I most certainly do have a different understanding of morality that you do...my darling little liberal sweetie pie.

You might try to read and comprehend my post one more time...baby doll. I did not state that anyone who disagrees with me is immoral. But, I suspect you are incapable of comprehending anything except Socialism.
 
Werbung:
More absurdity from someone who is so far out in left field she is incapable of EVER accepting the truth.

So, we can conclude from your post that you think it is not immoral to kill your unborn child or expect someone else to support you...or any of the other items I posted. Yes, I most certainly do have a different understanding of morality that you do...my darling little liberal sweetie pie.

You might try to read and comprehend my post one more time...baby doll. I did not state that anyone who disagrees with me is immoral. But, I suspect you are incapable of comprehending anything except Socialism.
So, then, usury is OK, greed is good, demeaning the poor is just fine, and there's nothing wrong with hating someone else's religion.

Just don't be a "liberal." That's the only unforgivable sin.

Understood.
 
More absurdity from someone who is so far out in left field she is incapable of EVER accepting the truth.

So, we can conclude from your post that you think it is not immoral to kill your unborn child or expect someone else to support you...or any of the other items I posted. Yes, I most certainly do have a different understanding of morality that you do...my darling little liberal sweetie pie.

You might try to read and comprehend my post one more time...baby doll. I did not state that anyone who disagrees with me is immoral. But, I suspect you are incapable of comprehending anything except Socialism.

Dear, your "Truth" and my "Truth" are different. I accept that.
Maybe it is time for you to grow up and accept that instead of just trying to insult my beliefs.

Obviously, although I respect the fact that you have the right to your "truth," I also very much defend my RIGHT to express MY TRUTH.

So. . .stop trying to belittle me, my beliefs, or my opinions, and let's just accept once and for all that we will NEVER see eye to eye, but that we BOTH have the right to our opinions.

By the way, honey bun. . . don't you think it would help with the "respect part" of the equation if you stopped VAINLY trying to insult me with totally outdated and ridiculous "pet names?"

You may think it makes you look smart or mature, and that it makes me look stupid and weak. . .but you would fool ONLY stupid people. . .and apparently I have more faith in most posters' intelligence in this forum (even the posters I tend to disagree with) than you do!

And, NO, I do not think that it is immoral to have an EARLY TERM ABORTION. . .in fact I think it is a LOT LESS immoral than letting a child be born that will never be cared for and will be considered as "extra baggage" and "a drain on the system" or a "profitor trying to take away the wealth of those job creators" and end up either in jail or in the street!

In term of comprehension. . .I apparently comprehend a lot more than you do in term of social morality and empathy. I am proud of stating my opinions as being diametrically opposite to yours. I couldn't live with your narrow interpretation of "moral" and your disregard for the less fortunates.
 
So, then, usury is OK, greed is good, demeaning the poor is just fine, and there's nothing wrong with hating someone else's religion.

Just don't be a "liberal." That's the only unforgivable sin.

Understood.

Do you libs ever stop with your absurd posts? Ever?

Please find just one post out of my 4k posts here were I posted anything resembling the ignorance that you claim. Just one my dear pot smoking p-school unionized pensioner...just one.
 
Do you libs ever stop with your absurd posts? Ever?

Please find just one post out of my 4k posts here were I posted anything resembling the ignorance that you claim. Just one my dear pot smoking p-school unionized pensioner...just one.
I'm rubber, you're glue....

Did you actually read the post you were responding to? Everything I said came from there.
 
Nonsense as usual. Get off the evil weed and just maybe, you will make sense for once.

The post you apparently didn't read, as you simply dismissed it read in part:


It is not moral to use people to make more money by forcing them to pay huge interest rates on "payday loans."
It is not moral to demean, make fun and disregard the suffering of people who have less then you, or to insist that it is "their fault" because "they don't work enough" when they cannot make ends meet.
and I replied quite appropriately:

So, then, usury is OK, greed is good, demeaning the poor is just fine, and there's nothing wrong with hating someone else's religion.

Just don't be a "liberal." That's the only unforgivable sin.

Understood.

What I said came from the post you dismissed. Apparently, you either didn't read it, or you think usury, demeaning the poor, and hating someone else's religion is OK.

If that's you opinion, you're entitled to it, but you should really acknowledge it.
 
Werbung:
Back
Top