You're still the fool with a lower then eighth grade education, or so your posts indicate. Tell me fool, what is a "non baby"?
Openmind says:
So. . .stop focusing on "stillbirth" and start broadening your views and explain why CHILDREN, (as in TODDLERS) are more likely to die in the US than almost anywhere in developed countries!
The right wing "christian" fools responds:
You're supposedly a social worker, you should know why.
Recognizing your lack of intellect, or even intellectual curiosity, why is it you cannot figure it out for yourself? Why do you have to be constantly spoonfed information? Try something you support as a cause, income inequality:
http://www.businessinsider.com/why-infant-mortality-higher-in-us-than-europe-2014-10
"Cumulative infant mortality rates are higher in the US at every stage — at birth, in the first month, and in the first year — ..........
The authors think the cumulative difference in rates, therefore, have less to do with acute health problems just after birth and more to do with SIDS, sudden death, and accidents.
The data suggests that the higher infant mortality in the US comes almost entirely from the deaths of babies born to poor women. Once they broke down the data into income and education levels the researchers found that, somewhat unsurprisingly,
the infants of well-off, educated white women are just as likely to survive as their counterparts in Europe. They also found that the data was unchanged if they excluded black infants from the US sample (n.b. there
is a documented black-white gap in infant mortality rates, but the authors find that it doesn't seem to be a mechanism here).
Thus, the conclusion is that this is about class. Poor women in the United States see their infants die at an alarming rate, given the medical technology available in this country.