I just blocked your whole rant together because it was a combination of nonsense & talking in circles.
Nonsense? Well I can remember when I thought that Calculus was nonsense too, but then I actually bothered to learn it, perhaps you should do the same thing where it relates to the constitution.
1) The documents did have obvious flaws, are subject to some interpretation and will continue to evolve in various ways, amendments and SCOTUS rulings.
YOU say they were "obvious flaws", but as is normal for liberals who seek to trash the constitution because it's "inconvenient" to their Socialist aims, you fail to view it through the lens of the time when it was originally crafted, as well as refusing to give the authors credit for having the vision to understand that it would need to be changed over time, thereby including Article 5 which provides the means by which is could be changed, which has been done 17 times since.
2) Don't forget when you go into your religious rants about "Christian American Founders" that may of the founders were actually Deists. Noticed by the fact that in our founding documents while the word God or Creator is written the word Jesus never ever is. And this is exemplified in legal government documents such as the... Treaty of Tripoli
Very few of the founders were what you call "Deists", at least in the modern sense of the word. The fact is that of the 56 signers of the Declaration of Independence, 32 were Episcopalian/Anglican, 13 were Congregationalists, 12 were Presbyterians, 2 were Quakers, 2 were Unitarians, and there was 1 Catholic. Of the 48 signers of the Articles of Confederation, 14 were Episcopalian/Anglican, 9 were Congregationalists, 4 were Presbyterians, 18 were 'Protestants' (specific affiliation unknown), and there were 1 each Catholic, Quaker, Lutheran, and Huguenot. Among the 55 members of the Constitutional Convention there were 31 Episcopalian/Anglicans, 16 Presbyterians, 8 Congregationalists, 3 Quakers, and 2 each Catholic, Methodist, Lutheran, and Dutch Reformed.
The reason that the name of Jesus was not specifically listed in any of the official documents was because, as was later included in the First Amendment, the founders had no wish to create a Theocracy where ANY specific religion would be given precedent over any other. Don't forget, one of the reasons that many of the founders left England in the first place was because of the Church of England, which exercised entirely too much control over the government.
3) And
pleeeease don't be a complete moron. President Obama was a United States Senator with NATIONAL SECURITY CLEARANCE long before he was our President. That requires a full background check by the FBI, CIA and other federal agencies.
Hint: They check for citizenship before granting anyone elevated National Security Clearance.
Apparently you don't know dick about how members of Congress acquire their security clearances. Since only a very select few are ever allowed to participate on Committees where "real" classified material is discussed, a member of Congress getting a security clearance is perfunctory. Only those members of those select committees that do hear the "real" classified information go through the same background checks that the military/FBI/CIA require, and the illegal Kenyan immigrant wasn't on any of those committees, so he was NOT fully vetted, much less granted an "elevated security clearance". At the most, he was cleared for "FOUO" and "Classified" information, possibly low level "Secret" information, but he was NEVER cleared for "Top Secret" intel.
All of that aside for a moment, you still haven't answered the most salient question; WHAT ARE YOU AFRAID OF? Why are you so afraid to have the court issue a Writ of Mandamus and require the hospital in Hawaii to present a vault copy of his Certificate of Live Birth (as opposed to that joke of a Certification of Live Birth, which the AG of Hawaii has already ruled isn't good enough to get a kid registered for T-Ball) and other pertinent medical and billing records as PROOF POSITIVE that he was in fact born in Hawaii? The fact that you liberals were screaming for John McCain to have his record cleared, and especially to the degree that you were demanding that it be proved (I remember some trying to say that the US military hospital he was born in didn't qualify as sovereign US territory
), why are you being so hypocritical now when it concerns Obama? Is it the possibility that Biden would become President?