steveox
Well-Known Member
So you voted Guilty? You didnt follow the law tower.
So you voted Guilty? You didnt follow the law tower.
Then Vote Not Guilty
but she IS guilty, the prosecution could not PROVE that fact. you don't have an option for both.
and she's not crazy. sick perhaps but anythign but crazy.
What makes her guilty?
What makes her guilty?
Yeah? What makes her guilty?
What makes her guilty?
The fact that she did it. The jurors (who have opined) have admitted as much but stated specifically that the prosecution simply did not tie the circumstancil evidence together so as to place guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. We have not enough evidence that Hitler DEFINITELY died in that bunker but he did.
Rob, she is guilty at the very very least of child neglect.
The jury did not find her guilty but that doesn't mean she wasn't
her child was missing over 30 days and she never reported it and when her mother finally reported it she lied about who had the child and where the child was exc. she was found guilty on the lying but not what she lied about, i found that irritating. that jury makes me sick!
child neglect alone she is proven to have done and it is child abuse, or child neglect how ever you want to word it.
I think she did a whole lot more than just neglect the child but the jury could have at least found her guilty on that.
There were charges against her of child abuse/child neglect.
She was found not guilty on those charges but was found guilty on 4 counts of lying to the police about the whereabouts of her daughter. How can a jury find her guilty on 4 counts of lying and misleading police during an investigation yet find her not guilty on child abuse / neglect when the lies she was convicted of telling were about the daughter that was missing over 30 days without being reported.
I could not of found her guilty of intentional murder, I do not think she purposefully killed her daughter and even if I did there is not enough evidence to prove that but there was clearly enough evidence to convict her of child neglect / abuse and I think there was clearly enough evidence to convict her of involuntary manslaughter.
the whole case was insane and the jury as dysfunctional as her whole family
There were charges against her of child abuse/child neglect.
She was found not guilty on those charges but was found guilty on 4 counts of lying to the police about the whereabouts of her daughter. How can a jury find her guilty on 4 counts of lying and misleading police during an investigation yet find her not guilty on child abuse / neglect when the lies she was convicted of telling were about the daughter that was missing over 30 days without being reported.
I could not of found her guilty of intentional murder, I do not think she purposefully killed her daughter and even if I did there is not enough evidence to prove that but there was clearly enough evidence to convict her of child neglect / abuse and I think there was clearly enough evidence to convict her of involuntary manslaughter.
the whole case was insane and the jury as dysfunctional as her whole family
Looked it up... in Florida, the crime of Aggravated Child Abuse can be committed in one of three ways by either:
1) Committing an aggravated battery on a child.
2) Willfully torturing, maliciously punishing, or willfully and unlawfully caging a child.
3) Knowingly or willfully abusing a child and in so doing causing great bodily harm, permanent disability, or permanent disfigurement to the child.
Which of these three did the prosecution prove she was guilty of?