EXPOSED!! Video shows Beck uses Vicks to cry on cue

[AtheismIsReality]

AIR, I'm trying to figure out where Palin comes into this discussion. Or Katie Couric for that matter... Where is the question that you are waiting the answer to? Perhaps I missed it, so could you provide the post number? Thanks!

https://www.houseofpolitics.com/forum/showpost.php?p=111312&postcount=11

 

[TruthAboveAll]

https://www.houseofpolitics.com/forum/showpost.php?p=111312&postcount=11

Ah, I see. Thank you very much; I missed that incorporation of her name into the discussion.

 

[AtheismIsReality]

Katie Couric had over 3 hours of video tape of interviews and carefully took the worst 10 minutes. Ill bet that I could tape anyone for 3 hours and find ten minutes of some pretty poor looking stuff too.

Palin was not a national politician she had to be very nervous and she had to of known going into this that Katie didnt like her. That alone would be hard for anyone.

Tell you what, go cull through the unedited transcripts and point out where Palin sounded "smart."

Here's the kicker, she ducked O'Reilly. Obama did O'Reilly. Palin is STILL ducking O'Reilly. What's she running from?

 

[TheFranklinParty]

You guys are such a bunch of bloomin' idiots! This has been around the internet in the past month, paraded like it's some sort of expose or something. For cryin' out loud, it's a photo shoot, for a GQ feature, by liberal photographer Jill Greenberg.

Another typical hatchet job, botched up with somebody running it as an "exclusive", when its popping up all over the place like a ring of magic toadstools. More lib-tard propaganda, just full of more lib-tard lies.

I agree...this is a photo shoot. What does this have to do with anything. They wanted a picture that would make fun of his propensity to weep on his show. If you have never been in a photo shoot you should keep your comments to yourself because you're just showing your desire to hate anyone that doesn't agree with you.

Just so we are clear, I'm not a fan. I like that he is asking good questions, but I don't like his need to sensationalize.

By the way, in photo shoots I've seen Vicks used, smelling salts, scotch tape (like a temporary face lift), and lemons (to make a person look mean). The photographers and the make-up people are very creative when necessary to get just the right look.

 

[top gun]

This Beck is genius and if he weren't, he would not be feared or talked about!

Who cares about how tears are generated!


I'm thinking alot of those people that lost their jobs
this month are feeling like cryin!

Unemployment 9.8% under Obama and he ain't done yet!

Obama brags about these jobs he creates, it's called CHANGE!

And yet again asur misses the whole point...

GLENN BECK IS A FRAUD JUST LIKE THE SIDE & THE POSITIONS HE REPRESENTS!!!

 

[TruthAboveAll]

Tell you what, go cull through the unedited transcripts and point out where Palin sounded "smart."

Here's the kicker, she ducked O'Reilly. Obama did O'Reilly. Palin is STILL ducking O'Reilly. What's she running from?

This is a straw man argument. What is she running from? The same question could be asked why Obama still ducks having an interview with Sean Hannity. Why would her "ducking" O'Reilly be a kicker? You can find as many references that O'Reilly likes and/or supports Palin, as those that he doesn't. And I had no idea that he'd been trying to get her to come on, and she snubbed or refused him.

 

[AtheismIsReality]

This is a straw man argument. What is she running from? The same question could be asked why Obama still ducks having an interview with Sean Hannity. Why would her "ducking" O'Reilly be a kicker? You can find as many references that O'Reilly likes and/or supports Palin, as those that he doesn't. And I had no idea that he'd been trying to get her to come on, and she snubbed or refused him.

That's not a straw man. I'm not presenting anybody's modified argument as their onw.

What I wrote is called "an opinion."

The kicker is BillO's interview would have been the most scrutinized affair by the left. If BillO didn't hold her to account like he did others, then you would have heard about it. Palin partisans' wouldn't have had an excuse that O'Reilly was unfair to Palin. He would have been tough, as he was with the rest.

And Sean Hannity? Why would Obama do Fox's 2nd chair partisan hack when he sat down with The Big Dog? The O'Reilly Factor - #1 cable news show since they hired him.

 

[TruthAboveAll]

That's not a straw man. I'm not presenting anybody's modified argument as their onw.

What I wrote is called "an opinion."

My apologies, you are correct. I utilized the "straw man" identifier as it is so often used these days - any flawed argument interjected to mislead or deceive.

The kicker is BillO's interview would have been the most scrutinized affair by the left. If BillO didn't hold her to account like he did others, then you would have heard about it. Palin partisans' wouldn't have had an excuse that O'Reilly was unfair to Palin. He would have been tough, as he was with the rest.

So you are saying that the left would hold a Bill O'Reilly interview to a different standard? Or that he would intentionally go easy on her? I agree that he would have been tough, but I don't think someone being "tough" is the cause of any of the protests of the style or methods used by MSM (Couric and others) used.

You clarified that it was what is called "an opinion." Perhaps if you clarified that a bit within the confines of your original statement it would not have been as misleading. You said:

Here's the kicker, she ducked O'Reilly. Obama did O'Reilly. Palin is STILL ducking O'Reilly. What's she running from?

So, is there evidence that she ducked O'Reilly? That she is STILL ducking O'Reilly? That she is running from something?

[QUOTE
And Sean Hannity? Why would Obama do Fox's 2nd chair partisan hack when he sat down with The Big Dog? The O'Reilly Factor - #1 cable news show since they hired him.[/QUOTE]

The question of whether he is "Fox's 2nd chair" or not is inconsequential. Obama was invited to call in to Hannity's radio show numerous times to have the opportunity to clarify something he'd said. He was invited to the TV program for the same purpose. Yet throughout PBO continued to comment about Hannity, criticizing things out of context without recourse for rebuttal. PBO himself gave weight and importance to Hannity by his ongoing references to him.

So by your definition, was PBO ducking Hannity, still ducking him, and running from something? Your context would make it so.

 

[AtheismIsReality]

My apologies, you are correct. I utilized the "straw man" identifier as it is so often used these days - any flawed argument interjected to mislead or deceive.

No worries.

As I said, I believe Palin is ducking O'Reilly. If she want exposure to the base, why not go on the biggest show in the game? She's scared, that's why. She could always prove me wrong and wow us, but after hearing her for months, I see no evidence of that happening. Her biggest contribution to Alaska, the most socialist state in the union, was to increase taxes on the oil company so Alaskans could get a bigger oil check. Sounds like she sides with Obama on making corporations pay their fair share.

I couldn't care less about Hannity. Didn't all the sniping at Hannity happen after Obama got elected? Hannity can consult Robert Gibbs. Ever since he and Colmes split up, Hannity has gone off a cliff into even greater hackdom. For instance, he was having a s$%t hemorrhage about Obama's czars. If he is so concerned about what czars do why not ask that other Fox News Contributor, Karl Rove. You remember Rove, right? He was Bush's "domestic policy czar" appointed after the reelection WITHOUT any Congressional approval. Hannity has Rove on all the time. Why not put his feet to the fire? Yeah, Obama should do more than snipe at that hack.