and will continue regardless of how long we keep waging a "war on terror" or on how we do it. It's a lot like shooting cockroaches with a .22. It kills a few cockroaches, but not nearly as fast as they multiply, and does a lot of damage in the process.
Actually, my little metaphor was more directed at things like starting wars and invading nations in the name of the war on terror, along with the Patriot Act and indefinite detention, rather than assassinating leaders of Al Qaeda.
But, allow me to observe just who is sounding conservative now!
Actually, my little metaphor was more directed at things like starting wars and invading nations in the name of the war on terror, along with the Patriot Act and indefinite detention, rather than assassinating leaders of Al Qaeda.
But, allow me to observe just who is sounding conservative now!
did you just notice? I am not a hippie peace love liberal...You hit us, I will hit back harder...you don't fuck with us, I don't fuck with you. Iraq never hit us, Afghanistan and al Queda did...so yes, we will kill there leaders.
Look up. Now wave to that thing flying by over your head. That's the point I was making, say 'Hello'.
I think they both screwed up because they've both decided that we need the DHS, and they've both overlooked the FISA violations which are occuring. It has nothing to do with wanting a Unicorn wrangler in the White House.
Different issue, but MS13 and the like are my standard response to anyone who says the 2nd Amendment is outdated. MS13 and such are exactly why we still need militias. Police around the country have already admitted that they can't really deal with groups like these.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.