Hannity confession: smoking gun evidence as Fox chief Murdoch forced under oath

Werbung:
mark francis said:
Democrats claim the courts back them up by supporting their crooked claims that no fraud occurred. No court in the country has ever said no fraud occurred.
Click to expand...

courts have said there is no credible evidence of fraud.

two YEARS and you morons still have nothing lol.

you're so stupid
 
pjmret said:
tainted judges? you mean every single one who heard a court case, including those appointed by trump? including the supreme court?

everyone is tainted...dhs, doj, courts, red states, everyone I say!
hahahahhahahah
Click to expand...
A judge who sanctions an American for saying democrats committed voter fraud before the judge first proves the claim of fraud is false is a tainted judge.
 
pjmret said:
courts have said there is no credible evidence of fraud.

two YEARS and you morons still have nothing lol.

you're so stupid
Click to expand...
Is justice blind? Are Americans stupid? Claiming not to have seen evidence of fraud is not the same thing as claiming the evidence proves no fraud took place.
 
mark francis said:
A judge who sanctions an American for saying democrats committed voter fraud before the judge first proves the claim of fraud is false is a tainted judge.
Click to expand...

nope, you're still a moron.

you get sanctioned if the evidence you present is stupid and should never have gone to court.

again, moron, its up to the plaintiff to prove their case, not the judge to prove them wrong.

you're so stupid :)
 
mark francis said:
Is justice blind? Are Americans stupid? Claiming not to have seen evidence of fraud is not the same thing as claiming the evidence proves no fraud took place.
Click to expand...

yes, moron. as i've been agreeing all along. the evidence doesn't prove fraud happened.

god you're stupid.
 
pjmret said:
nope, you're still a moron.

you get sanctioned if the evidence you present is stupid and should never have gone to court.

again, moron, its up to the plaintiff to prove their case, not the judge to prove them wrong.

you're so stupid :)
Click to expand...
No, democrats commit crimes against their political enemies that they would never think of committing if they had better characters.
 
pjmret said:
yes, moron. as i've been agreeing all along. the evidence doesn't prove fraud happened.

god you're stupid.
Click to expand...
If democrats know they cannot prove no fraud occurred, then why do they still oppose reasonable security measures designed to stop the fraud from occurring whether it can be hidden by the crooks or not?
 
mark francis said:
If democrats know they cannot prove no fraud occurred, then why do they still oppose reasonable security measures designed to stop the fraud from occurring whether it can be hidden by the crooks or not?
Click to expand...

who opposes "reasonable security measures"?

list the "reasonable security measures" and name the people who oppose them.
 
Starcastle said:
There were 3 recounts in Georgia. Result unchanged.


How are the polls lying?
Click to expand...
Let's just say polls are craftily worded by pollsters to generate the responses the pollsters desire and that people answering the polls tend to tell lies anyway.
 
Werbung:

Similar threads

Yo Daddy!
Sean Hannity Demands Nancy Pelosi's Texts Be Subpoenaed by Jan. 6 Committee
2
Replies
21
Views
1K
the annoying thing
T
Little-Acorn
Media mogul charged with 1 count of being Rupert Murdoch
Replies
2
Views
1K
pocketfullofshells
pocketfullofshells
Little-Acorn
Smoking-gun edict shows the Federal Govt was behind the Housing meltdown
Replies
9
Views
2K
dogtowner
dogtowner
GBFan
DC Gun Ban Declared Unconstitutional
Replies
2
Views
1K
Texas_tea
Texas_tea
Little-Acorn
    • Like
Negroes with Guns
2 3 4
Replies
48
Views
6K
Texas_tea
Texas_tea
Back
Top