Hannity confession: smoking gun evidence as Fox chief Murdoch forced under oath

[pjmret]

I did not ask for a smokescreen and deflection. I asked for one example of one court case that was decided by one judge who supposedly ruled that the evidence presented to him proved that no fraud took place in the 2020 election.

you're so stupid. again, courts do not prove that something bad didn't happen, they rule on whether there is evidence something bad did happen.

judges ruled that the evidence presented did not prove fraud. that's how courts work. If you think something went wrong, you present your evidence that something went wrong, and the judge decides if it is credible or not.

and they all ruled that the evidence of fraud was not credible. duh.

 

[pjmret]

Polls cannot be trusted and wise Americans take reported poll results with a grain of salt.

wise americans realize that when every judge ruled that there was no credible evidence of this massive fraud, that when every state certified their results, when polls agreed with the final results, when even trump's dhs and doj ruled there was no massive fraud..that there was no massive fraud. lol.

but you're not a wise american. you're a moron.

 

[pjmret]

so for example, in michigan:

In President Donald Trump’s second loss in court in a single day, a Michigan judge rejected the Trump campaign’s bid to stop counting ballots without their inspectors present. The judge scoffed at plaintiffs’ “hearsay” evidence that a lawyer said she heard from a poll worker regarding dates supposedly changed on ballots.

“‘I heard someone else say something,'” Michigan Judge Cynthia Stephens said on Thursday, summing up an affidavit submitted by the Trump campaign. “Tell me how that is not hearsay. Come on now!”

Michigan Judge Dismisses Trump Lawsuit Backed by 'Hearsay' Evidence | Law & Crime

In President Donald Trump's second loss in court in a single day, a Michigan judge rejected the Trump campaign's bid to stop counting ballots without their inspectors present. The judge scoffed at plaintiffs' "hearsay" evidence that a lawyer said she heard from a poll worker regarding dates...

lawandcrime.com

no credible evidence.


A Michigan state judge denied a GOP effort to delay the certification of election results in Detroit Friday after the battleground state elected Joe Biden over President Donald Trump, issuing a ruling that forcefully struck down Republican election observers’ allegations of impropriety and voter fraud as “incorrect and not credible” speculation not backed up by evidence.

GOP Loses In Michigan, Again: Judge Denies ‘Incorrect And Not Credible’ Effort To Block Election Results

The judge said GOP poll watchers’ claims of impropriety by election workers were “rife with speculation and guess-work” and not backed up by evidence.

www.forbes.com

no credible evidence


State Senate Republicans who investigated Michigan’s 2020 presidential election for months concluded there was no widespread or systemic fraud and urged the state attorney general to consider probing people who have made baseless allegations about the results in Antrim County to raise money or publicity “for their own ends.”

Michigan Senate GOP probe: No systemic fraud in election

LANSING, Mich. (AP) — State Senate Republicans who investigated Michigan's 2020 presidential election for months concluded there was no widespread or systemic fraud and urged the state attorney general to consider probing people who have made baseless allegations about the results in Antrim...

apnews.com

republicans investigated for MONTHS and found no credible evidence. lol


Sidney Powell and her team of pro-Trump lawyers must pay $175,250 in legal fees for their conspiracy-laden lawsuit that sought to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in Michigan, a federal judge ordered Thursday.

U.S. District Judge Linda Parker, of Michigan's Eastern District, imposed sanctions on the attorneys in late August. Her Thursday order determined the amount Powell and the others involved in the so-called Kraken lawsuit must pay.

Judge imposes sanctions on Sidney Powell, lawyers involved in election conspiracy lawsuit

U.S. District Judge Linda Parker for Michigan's Eastern District ordered the attorneys to pay $175,250.

www.freep.com

the "evidence" was so stupid that attorneys were sanctioned, which almost never happens.


so again..no credible evidence of this "massive fraud" you morons CONTINUE to claim happened.
hahahahahha

 

[mark francis]

Why would I care what you asked?

Nobody can name one court judgment claiming the court examined the evidence and that the evidence proves voter fraud did not occur. Democrats who say that are lying.

 

[mark francis]

Those who trust in polls are unwise.

 

[pjmret]

Those who trust in polls are unwise.

"trust" in them? they are interesting data. those who totally ignore them are stupid.

 

[pjmret]

Nobody can name one court judgment claiming the court examined the evidence and that the evidence proves voter fraud did not occur. Democrats who say that are lying.

who says that courts proved that no fraud occured? name names.

courts said that republican morons didn't prove that fraud did happen. duh

 

[mark francis]

wise americans realize that when every judge ruled that there was no credible evidence of this massive fraud, that when every state certified their results, when polls agreed with the final results, when even trump's dhs and doj ruled there was no massive fraud..that there was no massive fraud. lol.

but you're not a wise american. you're a moron.

Courts rejected fraud cases for several different reasons but not a single court in the country said it eaxmined the evidence and the evidence proved no voter fraud occurred. Judges may be crooked and unwise but likely no judge is willing to lie by saying he or his court thoroughly examined the evidence, and the evidence proved no fraud occurred.

 

[pjmret]

Courts rejected fraud cases for several different reasons but not a single court in the country said it eaxmined the evidence and the evidence proved no voter fraud occurred. Judges may be crooked and unwise but likely no judge is willing to lie by saying he or his court thoroughly examined the evidence, and the evidence proved no fraud occurred.

correct, courts don't rule that evidence claiming fraud happened doesn't prove fraud didn't happen.
why would evidence claiming fraud prove it didn't happen? duh.

god you can be so stupid sometimes. lol
actually you seem like a moron constantly.

 

[mark francis]

so for example, in michigan:

In President Donald Trump’s second loss in court in a single day, a Michigan judge rejected the Trump campaign’s bid to stop counting ballots without their inspectors present. The judge scoffed at plaintiffs’ “hearsay” evidence that a lawyer said she heard from a poll worker regarding dates supposedly changed on ballots.

“‘I heard someone else say something,'” Michigan Judge Cynthia Stephens said on Thursday, summing up an affidavit submitted by the Trump campaign. “Tell me how that is not hearsay. Come on now!”

Michigan Judge Dismisses Trump Lawsuit Backed by 'Hearsay' Evidence | Law & Crime

In President Donald Trump's second loss in court in a single day, a Michigan judge rejected the Trump campaign's bid to stop counting ballots without their inspectors present. The judge scoffed at plaintiffs' "hearsay" evidence that a lawyer said she heard from a poll worker regarding dates...

lawandcrime.com

no credible evidence.

Take note. Judge Cynthis Stephens did not say the evidence itself proved no fraud occurred.

A Michigan state judge denied a GOP effort to delay the certification of election results in Detroit Friday after the battleground state elected Joe Biden over President Donald Trump, issuing a ruling that forcefully struck down Republican election observers’ allegations of impropriety and voter fraud as “incorrect and not credible” speculation not backed up by evidence.

GOP Loses In Michigan, Again: Judge Denies ‘Incorrect And Not Credible’ Effort To Block Election Results

The judge said GOP poll watchers’ claims of impropriety by election workers were “rife with speculation and guess-work” and not backed up by evidence.

www.forbes.com

no credible evidence


State Senate Republicans who investigated Michigan’s 2020 presidential election for months concluded there was no widespread or systemic fraud and urged the state attorney general to consider probing people who have made baseless allegations about the results in Antrim County to raise money or publicity “for their own ends.”

Michigan Senate GOP probe: No systemic fraud in election

LANSING, Mich. (AP) — State Senate Republicans who investigated Michigan's 2020 presidential election for months concluded there was no widespread or systemic fraud and urged the state attorney general to consider probing people who have made baseless allegations about the results in Antrim...

apnews.com

republicans investigated for MONTHS and found no credible evidence. lol

The republican investigators did not say the evidence proved no voter fraud occurred, they just said they did not see the evidence. That makes sense since crooks have fine-tuned their abilities to conceal voter fraud, but they cannot prove no voter fraud occurred.

Sidney Powell and her team of pro-Trump lawyers must pay $175,250 in legal fees for their conspiracy-laden lawsuit that sought to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in Michigan, a federal judge ordered Thursday.

U.S. District Judge Linda Parker, of Michigan's Eastern District, imposed sanctions on the attorneys in late August. Her Thursday order determined the amount Powell and the others involved in the so-called Kraken lawsuit must pay.

Judge imposes sanctions on Sidney Powell, lawyers involved in election conspiracy lawsuit

U.S. District Judge Linda Parker for Michigan's Eastern District ordered the attorneys to pay $175,250.

www.freep.com

the "evidence" was so stupid that attorneys were sanctioned, which almost never happens.

Democrats are jailing American patriots for publicly objecting to their seditious voter fraud and democrats have fined Trump tens of millions of dollars for claiming Hillary and the democrats dishonestly invented the Russian collusion theory for selfish crooked political reasons, so it is no surprise that tainted judges will sanction anyone fighting democrat voter fraud in their jurisdiction.

so again..no credible evidence of this "massive fraud" you morons CONTINUE to claim happened.
hahahahahha

 

[mark francis]

"trust" in them? they are interesting data. those who totally ignore them are stupid.

Lying polls help nobody.

 

[pjmret]

Lying polls help nobody.

show which polls "lie", moron. lol

 

[mark francis]

who says that courts proved that no fraud occured? name names.

courts said that republican morons didn't prove that fraud did happen. duh

You prove my point. No court in the country ever said no voter fraud occurred.

 

[pjmret]

Take note. Judge Cynthis Stephens did not say the evidence itself proved no fraud occurred.

The republican investigators did not say the evidence proved no voter fraud occurred, they just said they did not see the evidence. That makes sense since crooks have fine-tuned their abilities to conceal voter fraud, but they cannot prove no voter fraud occurred.

Democrats are jailing American patriots for publicly objecting to their seditious voter fraud and democrats have fined Trump tens of millions of dollars for claiming Hillary and the democrats dishonestly invented the Russian collusion theory for selfish crooked political reasons, so it is no surprise that tainted judges will sanction anyone fighting democrat voter fraud in their jurisdiction.

tainted judges? you mean every single one who heard a court case, including those appointed by trump? including the supreme court?

everyone is tainted...dhs, doj, courts, red states, everyone I say!
hahahahhahahah

 

[mark francis]

correct, courts don't rule that evidence claiming fraud happened doesn't prove fraud didn't happen.
why would evidence claiming fraud prove it didn't happen? duh.

god you can be so stupid sometimes. lol
actually you seem like a moron constantly.

Democrats claim the courts back them up by supporting their crooked claims that no fraud occurred. No court in the country has ever said no fraud occurred.