LINK
I am baffled as to why the federal government of today is expected to apologize for slavery, considering it is the direct descendent of those governments that stamped out Jim Crow (a phenomenon of states and localities for which the federal government is responsible only insofar as it did not stop it sooner) and fought a bloody war to abolish slavery.
But leave it to the most unpopular do-nothing Congress in American history to pass non-binding apologies for social ills it isn't responsible for while every problem they promised to fix has gotten markedly worse on their watch.
Oh, and expect reparations sometime in the next decade or two.
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The House of Representatives was poised Tuesday to pass a resolution apologizing to African-Americans for slavery and the era of Jim Crow.
The nonbinding resolution, which is expected to pass, was introduced by Rep. Steve Cohen, a white lawmaker who represents a majority black district in Memphis, Tennessee.
While many states have apologized for slavery, it will be first time a branch of the federal government will apologize for slavery if the resolution passes, an aide to Cohen said.
By passing the resolution, the House would also acknowledge the "injustice, cruelty, brutality and inhumanity of slavery and Jim Crow."
"Jim Crow," or Jim Crow laws, were state and local laws enacted mostly in the Southern and border states of the United States between the 1870s and 1965, when African-Americans were denied the right to vote and other civil liberties and were legally segregated from whites.
The name "Jim Crow" came from a character played by T.D. "Daddy" Rice who portrayed a slave while in blackface during the mid-1800s.
The resolution states that "the vestiges of Jim Crow continue to this day."
"African-Americans continue to suffer from the consequences of slavery and Jim Crow -- long after both systems were formally abolished -- through enormous damage and loss, both tangible and intangible, including the loss of human dignity and liberty, the frustration of careers and professional lives, and the long-term loss of income and opportunity," the resolution states.
The House would also commit itself to stopping "the occurrence of human rights violations in the future," if it passes the resolution.
The resolution does not address the controversial issue of reparations. Some members of the African-American community have called on lawmakers to give cash payments or other financial benefits to descendents of slaves as compensation for the suffering caused by slavery.
The resolution will not be the first time lawmakers have apologized to an ethnic group for past injustices.
In April, the Senate passed a resolution sponsored by Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kansas, that apologized to Native Americans for "the many instances of violence, maltreatment and neglect."
In 1993, the Senate also passed a resolution apologizing for the "illegal overthrow" of the Kingdom of Hawaii in 1893.
In 1988, Congress passed and President Reagan signed a law apologizing to the 120,000 Japanese-Americans who were held in detention camps during World War II. The 60,000 detainees who were alive at the time each received $20,000 from the government.
I am baffled as to why the federal government of today is expected to apologize for slavery, considering it is the direct descendent of those governments that stamped out Jim Crow (a phenomenon of states and localities for which the federal government is responsible only insofar as it did not stop it sooner) and fought a bloody war to abolish slavery.
But leave it to the most unpopular do-nothing Congress in American history to pass non-binding apologies for social ills it isn't responsible for while every problem they promised to fix has gotten markedly worse on their watch.
Oh, and expect reparations sometime in the next decade or two.