Louisiana election cast out for fraud

[mark francis]

The US has always had crooks committing voting fraud in elections and probably always will. The Democrat won by one vote and demanded the election be certified in spite of fraud, but that was not to be, thank God. Crooked elections should never be certified to allow crooks to steal elections. Democrats that win crooked elections tend to demand that the election be certified, and the fraud ignored. That is because crooks want to win whether fairly or unfairly.

Democrat Election Win Declared Void After Voter Fraud Discovered (msn.com) 12-6-23

Democrat Election Win Declared Void After Voter Fraud Discovered

A number of votes were found to be invalid, according to a ruling by Justice Bleich© BluIz60/iStock / Getty Images Plus

Ajudge has ruled an extremely tight election between Republicans and Democrats for a Louisiana parish sheriff is void because of voter fraud.

The race to become Caddo Parish sheriff was closely fought between Democrat Henry Whitehorn and Republican John Nickelson. In November, a recount was ordered after Whitehorn won by just one vote in an election that saw over 43,000 ballots cast. The recount found three additional votes for each candidate and Whitehorn was declared the winner.

Both Nickelson and Whitehorn have been approached for comment by Newsweek.

Nickelson filed a lawsuit and retired Louisiana Supreme Court Justice E. Joseph Bleich declared the result void on Tuesday. Nickelson's suit said the count was done too quickly and could not be accurate, while ballots cast by people twice through mail-in and in-person ballots were discovered, NBC affiliate KTAL reported. Bleich was assigned to the case after four judges recused themselves due to their friendships with Nickelson.

In all, Bleich said that two people voted twice, five mail-in ballots should not have been counted for failure to comply with the law, and there were a further four invalid votes by interdicted persons who were unqualified voters.

Bleich wrote: "This runoff election involved a one-vote margin. It was proven beyond any doubt that there were at least 11 illegal votes cast and counted. It is legally impossible to know what the true vote should have been."

A new runoff has now been called, causing Whitehorn to comment that, "The judiciary should not decide elections." His team has appealed Bleich's decision to the second circuit court of appeal and says it will take it to the state Supreme Court if necessary.

In a statement, Whitehorn said: "Of course I am disappointed about the court's decision to overturn the will of the people of Caddo Parish. I was always taught that the person with the most votes wins, even if that's by a thousand votes or by one vote."

Whitehorn questioned the ruling, saying, "The rules of the game are different depending on who the players are." He continued: "I won the sheriff's race, not once, but twice. My opponent conveniently chose to question the integrity of the election only after he lost, not once, but twice. In elections, you should not be given a redo simply because you are unhappy with the results."

Nickelson said the decision was a "victory for election integrity" and that he was looking forward to the runoff scheduled for March.

Correction, 12/6/23, 8:30 a.m. ET: The headline on this article was updated to remove the word "widespread" when describing the voter fraud.

 

[pjmret]

The US has always had crooks committing voting fraud in elections and probably always will. The Democrat won by one vote and demanded the election be certified in spite of fraud, but that was not to be, thank God. Crooked elections should never be certified to allow crooks to steal elections. Democrats that win crooked elections tend to demand that the election be certified, and the fraud ignored. That is because crooks want to win whether fairly or unfairly.

Democrat Election Win Declared Void After Voter Fraud Discovered (msn.com) 12-6-23

Democrat Election Win Declared Void After Voter Fraud Discovered

A number of votes were found to be invalid, according to a ruling by Justice Bleich© BluIz60/iStock / Getty Images Plus

Ajudge has ruled an extremely tight election between Republicans and Democrats for a Louisiana parish sheriff is void because of voter fraud.

The race to become Caddo Parish sheriff was closely fought between Democrat Henry Whitehorn and Republican John Nickelson. In November, a recount was ordered after Whitehorn won by just one vote in an election that saw over 43,000 ballots cast. The recount found three additional votes for each candidate and Whitehorn was declared the winner.

Both Nickelson and Whitehorn have been approached for comment by Newsweek.

Nickelson filed a lawsuit and retired Louisiana Supreme Court Justice E. Joseph Bleich declared the result void on Tuesday. Nickelson's suit said the count was done too quickly and could not be accurate, while ballots cast by people twice through mail-in and in-person ballots were discovered, NBC affiliate KTAL reported. Bleich was assigned to the case after four judges recused themselves due to their friendships with Nickelson.

In all, Bleich said that two people voted twice, five mail-in ballots should not have been counted for failure to comply with the law, and there were a further four invalid votes by interdicted persons who were unqualified voters.

Bleich wrote: "This runoff election involved a one-vote margin. It was proven beyond any doubt that there were at least 11 illegal votes cast and counted. It is legally impossible to know what the true vote should have been."

A new runoff has now been called, causing Whitehorn to comment that, "The judiciary should not decide elections." His team has appealed Bleich's decision to the second circuit court of appeal and says it will take it to the state Supreme Court if necessary.

In a statement, Whitehorn said: "Of course I am disappointed about the court's decision to overturn the will of the people of Caddo Parish. I was always taught that the person with the most votes wins, even if that's by a thousand votes or by one vote."

Whitehorn questioned the ruling, saying, "The rules of the game are different depending on who the players are." He continued: "I won the sheriff's race, not once, but twice. My opponent conveniently chose to question the integrity of the election only after he lost, not once, but twice. In elections, you should not be given a redo simply because you are unhappy with the results."

Nickelson said the decision was a "victory for election integrity" and that he was looking forward to the runoff scheduled for March.

Correction, 12/6/23, 8:30 a.m. ET: The headline on this article was updated to remove the word "widespread" when describing the voter fraud.

County sheriff election? Lol

How about a us congress republican fraud


Prosecutors in North Carolina filed new felony charges against a Republican political operative accused of ballot tampering in a congressional election in 2018.

Leslie McCrae Dowless was charged Tuesday with two counts of felony obstruction of justice, perjury, solicitation to commit perjury, conspiracy to obstruct justice and illegal possession of absentee ballots, according to a statement by Wake County District Attorney Lorrin Freeman.

The charges relate to the tainted 9th congressional district election last year in which Republican Mark Harris led in the unofficial vote tally by a margin of about 900 votes over Democrat Dan McCready. But the election results were overturned by the state after an investigation into an absentee ballot operation on Harris' behalf suggested that Dowless had improperly collected and possibly tampered with ballots.

 

[pjmret]

No one denies fraud has occurred duh

Let me know when you morons prove the 2020 election was stolen lol

 

[Phoenix68]

Louisiana election cast out for fraud​

Democrat Election Win Declared Void After Voter Fraud Discovered (msn.com) 12-6-23

A judge has ruled an extremely tight election between Republicans and Democrats for a Louisiana parish sheriff is void because of voter fraud.

.
A new runoff has now been called.
.

.
Gee...whatta drag....democracy got in-the-way, again, Reverunt.
.​

 

[mark francis]

No one denies fraud has occurred duh

Let me know when you morons prove the 2020 election was stolen lol

Give it up. Nobody buys that lying leftist trick anymore. The evidence shows massive fraud and since they cannot disprove it, they claim the absolute proof of fraud was never achieved so rubes must believe it never occurred.

 

[pjmret]

Give it up. Nobody buys that lying leftist trick anymore. The evidence shows massive fraud and since they cannot disprove it, they claim the absolute proof of fraud was never achieved so rubes must believe it never occurred.

please dont give it up, i enjoy the amusement from laughing at you. lol.

if you morons had credible evidence you wouldn't have lost every court case, and fox news wouldn't have admitted it. lol

 

[Phoenix68]

Give it up. Nobody buys that lying leftist trick anymore. The evidence shows massive fraud and since they cannot disprove it,

.

.
Yeah....WE HEARD!!!!
.

.

.​

 

[mark francis]

please dont give it up, i enjoy the amusement from laughing at you. lol.

if you morons had credible evidence you wouldn't have lost every court case, and fox news wouldn't have admitted it. lol

Claiming the evidence of 2020 voting fraud does not exist or is a lie is dishonest.

 

[pjmret]

Claiming the evidence of 2020 voting fraud does not exist or is a lie is dishonest.

i claim is isn't credible enough to win a single court case. lol. because that's true. its a fact

you haven't disproven the mountain of evidence you are a murderer yet, so you must be.

 

[mark francis]

i claim is isn't credible enough to win a single court case. lol. because that's true. its a fact

you haven't disproven the mountain of evidence you are a murderer yet, so you must be.

You keep referring to voter fraud cases rejected in the days and weeks immediately following the election but before serious investigations had time to be done. What do you think those court cases that decided nothing about the validity of the mounting evidence of voting fraud supposedly proved, that the evidence the courts never examined in court proves no fraud took place anywhere in the country? If so, that is a stupid assumption.

 

[Phoenix68]

You keep referring to voter fraud cases rejected in the days and weeks immediately following the election but before serious investigations had time to be done. What do you think those court cases that decided nothing about the validity of the mounting evidence of voting fraud supposedly proved, that the evidence the courts never examined in court proves no fraud took place anywhere in the country? If so, that is a stupid assumption.

.

.

.​

 

[pjmret]

You keep referring to voter fraud cases rejected in the days and weeks immediately following the election but before serious investigations had time to be done. What do you think those court cases that decided nothing about the validity of the mounting evidence of voting fraud supposedly proved, that the evidence the courts never examined in court proves no fraud took place anywhere in the country? If so, that is a stupid assumption.

Why haven't you morons started and won cases recently then d7h
You morons just whine and whine
3 years and you have noth8ng lol

 

[Boris Norris]

The US has always had crooks committing voting fraud in elections and probably always will. The Democrat won by one vote and demanded the election be certified in spite of fraud, but that was not to be, thank God. Crooked elections should never be certified to allow crooks to steal elections. Democrats that win crooked elections tend to demand that the election be certified, and the fraud ignored. That is because crooks want to win whether fairly or unfairly.

Democrat Election Win Declared Void After Voter Fraud Discovered (msn.com) 12-6-23

Democrat Election Win Declared Void After Voter Fraud Discovered

A number of votes were found to be invalid, according to a ruling by Justice Bleich© BluIz60/iStock / Getty Images Plus

Ajudge has ruled an extremely tight election between Republicans and Democrats for a Louisiana parish sheriff is void because of voter fraud.

The race to become Caddo Parish sheriff was closely fought between Democrat Henry Whitehorn and Republican John Nickelson. In November, a recount was ordered after Whitehorn won by just one vote in an election that saw over 43,000 ballots cast. The recount found three additional votes for each candidate and Whitehorn was declared the winner.

Both Nickelson and Whitehorn have been approached for comment by Newsweek.

Nickelson filed a lawsuit and retired Louisiana Supreme Court Justice E. Joseph Bleich declared the result void on Tuesday. Nickelson's suit said the count was done too quickly and could not be accurate, while ballots cast by people twice through mail-in and in-person ballots were discovered, NBC affiliate KTAL reported. Bleich was assigned to the case after four judges recused themselves due to their friendships with Nickelson.

In all, Bleich said that two people voted twice, five mail-in ballots should not have been counted for failure to comply with the law, and there were a further four invalid votes by interdicted persons who were unqualified voters.

Bleich wrote: "This runoff election involved a one-vote margin. It was proven beyond any doubt that there were at least 11 illegal votes cast and counted. It is legally impossible to know what the true vote should have been."

A new runoff has now been called, causing Whitehorn to comment that, "The judiciary should not decide elections." His team has appealed Bleich's decision to the second circuit court of appeal and says it will take it to the state Supreme Court if necessary.

In a statement, Whitehorn said: "Of course I am disappointed about the court's decision to overturn the will of the people of Caddo Parish. I was always taught that the person with the most votes wins, even if that's by a thousand votes or by one vote."

Whitehorn questioned the ruling, saying, "The rules of the game are different depending on who the players are." He continued: "I won the sheriff's race, not once, but twice. My opponent conveniently chose to question the integrity of the election only after he lost, not once, but twice. In elections, you should not be given a redo simply because you are unhappy with the results."

Nickelson said the decision was a "victory for election integrity" and that he was looking forward to the runoff scheduled for March.

Correction, 12/6/23, 8:30 a.m. ET: The headline on this article was updated to remove the word "widespread" when describing the voter fraud.

How was god involved?

 

[the annoying thing]

This is the Worst Corruption Scandal in Louisiana History

Americans are growing less trusting of their political institutions. Per a Gallup poll, the vast majority of Americans have “some,” “very little,” or “no” confidence in congress and the presidency. This distrust in American politics likely stems, at least in part, from the litany of scandals...

247wallst.com

They have a long history of Corruption and voter fraud in the state it was really b ad when democrats controlled the south.

 

[mark francis]

Why haven't you morons started and won cases recently then d7h
You morons just whine and whine
3 years and you have noth8ng lol

Courts don't investigate voter fraud. They more than amply proved that in 2020.