The Republican party is too far to the right.

[Texas_tea]

So where is this theoretical shift to the far right? I don't see one new proposal that I would call a move to the Left.

There is no shift to the right as you have pointed out.
It is fear mongering from the socialist democrat party.
More spin and straight out lies from the current regime!

 

[Pandora]

I don't want anyone to panic tomorrow.

Obama is expected to take the early lead ....

Until the Republicans get off work!

hahah I love it

 

[Gipper]

Gipper and Cruela ,ou have such extreme views that it is hard to debate you, To link liberalism, Marxisim and Socialism is absurd they are different philosophies. You have not experience much of them in the USA but where they are practiced it is not hell.
This topic is about right wing or left wing.All parties are in the spectrum, the question is how far left or right they are.

I am afraid you have been duped to believe collectivism is an effective governing system. It is not. It is immoral. It is slavery. It is not sustainable.

Liberalism is NOT unlike Marxism and socialism. They are all left wing ideologies that impose collectivist policies at the point of gun. Why can't you see that?

 

[Cruella]

Gipper and Cruela ,ou have such extreme views that it is hard to debate you, To link liberalism, Marxisim and Socialism is absurd they are different philosophies. .

My views are based mostly on my life's experiences. Maybe you see liberalism, marxism and socialism as being differen't, but I see them as being wrapped up together and dangerous to my family and my country.

 

[Texas_tea]

In an astonishing display of media malpractice, CBS News quietly released proof--two days before the election, far too late to reach the media and the public--that President Barack Obama lied to the public about the Benghazi attack, as well as about his later claim to have called the attack "terrorism" from the beginning.


http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journa...efused-to-Call-Benghazi-Terror-CBS-Covered-Up

Watch the CBS 60 Minutes video at the link above.

 

[Pandora]

In an astonishing display of media malpractice, CBS News quietly released proof--two days before the election, far too late to reach the media and the public--that President Barack Obama lied to the public about the Benghazi attack, as well as about his later claim to have called the attack "terrorism" from the beginning.


http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journa...efused-to-Call-Benghazi-Terror-CBS-Covered-Up

Watch the CBS 60 Minutes video at the link above.

I am shocked but CNN is talking about it right now

 

[Cruella]

The media makes me sick. They are nothing more than Obama's panty washers. Traitors.

 

[Texas_tea]

The media makes me sick. They are nothing more than Obama's panty washers. Traitors.

Yes ...
Traitors and agents of the White House!
Just like other Communist countries.

 

[dogtowner]

I am shocked but CNN is talking about it right now

damn... nobody watches them !

 

[Texas Environmentalist]

This is the second time I have seen 60 Minutes (CBS) release new video of Obama's interview in reference to Benghazi. The first video was damning; this, this is the smoking gun that he knew what had happened and clearly tried covering it up so that he might coast on to election day without much of a blip in the media coverage. He didn't account for real journalists/correspondants such as Katherine Herridge, Jennifer Griffin and anchors Brett Baier and Megyn Kelly among others at Fox that have stayed on top of it. I don't understand why CBS, if they had not already released this piece, why are they doing it now? Did they have reason to think that at some point the video itself could be leaked or the fact that it even existed? Whoever gets elected Tuesday, I think there will be a firestorm of hearings on this forcing the media to cover it. CBS, by releasing it, may have been trying to salvage any credibility they might have had left. What a disgrace to the executive branch going all the way up to Obama along with a complicit media.

 

[Openmind]

Vitriol of this sort does you no good, my dear woman.
I know you quite well.
We are approximately the same age.
We grew up in the same times.
I understand where your feelings and politics come from--I was in that same crowd long ago and I can read you like a religious pamphlet from the Jehovah's Witnesses.
I know how, where and when your ideas were hatched, how they were nurtured and believed in--long after they were all made quite obviously incorrect--but you paid no heed.
You read too many Kurt Vonnegut novels.

Obviously you know NOTHING about me!
I never sat foot in The US before the age of 21' remember?
Yes, we are about the same age. . .too bad some age much faster. . .

 

[Johnny Tremain]

Obviously you know NOTHING about me!
I never sat foot in The US before the age of 21' remember?
Yes, we are about the same age. . .too bad some age much faster. . .

Yes. Some age like wine--some like bologna.
I have no idea when you came to the USA.
Were you deported?

 

[dogtowner]

Vitriol of this sort does you no good, my dear woman.
I know you quite well.
We are approximately the same age.
We grew up in the same times.
I understand where your feelings and politics come from--I was in that same crowd long ago and I can read you like a religious pamphlet from the Jehovah's Witnesses.
I know how, where and when your ideas were hatched, how they were nurtured and believed in--long after they were all made quite obviously incorrect--but you paid no heed.
You read too many Kurt Vonnegut novels.

hey Vonnegut was good in his prime. an absolute flake but could spin a good yarn.

 

[Aus22]

The only thing "extreme" her Aus is your ignorance (lack of knowledge) about this topic.


They are the same and they are in practice today by the socialist democrat party.

In Marxist theory, socialism, lower-stage communism or the socialist mode of production, refers to a specific historical phase of economic development and its corresponding set of social relations that eventually supersede capitalism in the schema of historical materialism. Socialism is defined as a mode of production where the criterion for economic production is use-value, and is based on direct production for use coordinated through conscious economic planning, where the law of value no longer directs economic activity, and thus monetary relations in the form of exchange-value, profit, interest and wage labor no longer operate. Income would be distributed according to individual contribution.

http://www.academia.edu/1155588/Karl_Marx_theory_of_the_mode_of_Production_as_a_cyclical_process




We are clearly on target here. The left represents liberalism early in the spectrum, further left is socialism and extreme left is communism.
We are all clear on how far "left" Obama & company has taken the democrat party and are accurately commenting accordingly.

Maybe you should brush up on this topic before accusing the members here of being so extreme that it's hard to debate them. Unless of course what you really mean is "I can't debate you because I don't have a clue what you're talking about."

Considering your "leftist" views, I will put my money on that one!

I find it hard to belie you got your definition of socialism from a Communist Karl Marx. Are you not aware the Communist fought a civil war in october Russia in 1917 to defeat the Socialist.
In most western countries socialist parties call themselves Democratic Socialist. They accept a Mixed economy but believe in progressive tax where some of the income of the rich is redistribute to the poor. .. However it still operates in a capitalist economy where valuer, profit and wage still operate but with some government control.This is not the same as Communism which is the direct government control of the Means of Production and Exchange.
Liberalism is an American term of abuse. Our main Conservative party in Australia is called the Liberal Party and is opposed to the Labor Party.

 

[Aus22]

I find it hard to belie you got your definition of socialism from a Communist Karl Marx. Are you not aware the Communist fought a civil war in october Russia in 1917 to defeat the Socialist.
In most western countries socialist parties call themselves Democratic Socialist. They accept a Mixed economy but believe in progressive tax where some of the income of the rich is redistribute to the poor. .. However it still operates in a capitalist economy where valuer, profit and wage still operate but with some government control.This is not the same as Communism which is the direct government control of the Means of Production and Exchange.
Liberalism is an American term of abuse. Our main Conservative party in Australia is called the Liberal Party and is opposed to the Labor Party.

Congratulate Obama. The Republican party if it wants to win next time must dumpt the extreme tea party right wingers and move to the center.