Disgusting accumulation of evidence of FBI corruption

The NABU’s investigation related to the 2010-2012 period is not particularly active, Kholodnytsky added.

“At the moment, this case is up in the air, so to speak. Up in the air means that there is no active investigative work ongoing. At the moment, detectives and prosecutors do not understand what they are supposed to be investigating,” Kholodnytsky said.


Nothing to shut down ***** duh
Shokin seized some of Zlochevsky's assets and less than 4 weeks later was fired when Biden blackmailed the Ukrainian president into firing Shokin.
 
Werbung:
But sources ranging from former Obama administration officials to an anti-corruption advocate in Ukraine say the official, Viktor Shokin, was ousted for the opposite reason Trump and his allies claim.
Why was Shokin fired just weeks after seizing Zlochevsky's assets? Because the IMF thought it was wrong to move against the mobster like that?
It wasn't because Shokin was investigating a natural gas company tied to Biden's son; it was because Shokin wasn't pursuing corruption among the country's politicians, according to a Ukrainian official and four former American officials who specialized in Ukraine and Europe.
American officials on the take getting rich from Burisma bribes called Shokin incompetent and advocated for his removal just weeks after he moved to shut Burisma down. So what other crooked criminals were being protected by Shokin that were supposedly successfully prosecuted after his removal? Nobody.
Without pressure from Joe Biden, European diplomats, the International Monetary Fund and other international organizations, Shokin would not have been fired, said Daria Kaleniuk, co-founder and executive director of the Anti Corruption Action Centre in Kiev.
The IMF did not threaten to hurt the Ukrainian president if he did not fire Shokin, Biden did. In Biden's own words, "I'm leaving in 6 hours and if you do not fire the prosecutor before I leave then you will not be getting the billion-dollar aid package approved by the US Congress. And guess what? The S-O-B was fired."
"Civil society organizations in Ukraine were pressing for his resignation," Kaleniuk said, "but no one would have cared if there had not been voices from outside this country calling on him to go."


Shokin was corrupted there was no active investigation to be shut down. You are a ***** lol
According to liars and deceivers, Shokin was corrupt, Trump was corrupt, General Flynn was corrupt, Senator Cruz is corrupt, Justice Thomas is corrupt, Jesus Christ was corrupt, and God is corrupt.
 
Why was Shokin fired just weeks after seizing Zlochevsky's assets? Because the IMF thought it was wrong to move against the mobster like that?

American officials on the take getting rich from Burisma bribes called Shokin incompetent and advocated for his removal just weeks after he moved to shut Burisma down. So what other crooked criminals were being protected by Shokin that were supposedly successfully prosecuted after his removal? Nobody.

The IMF did not threaten to hurt the Ukrainian president if he did not fire Shokin, Biden did. In Biden's own words, "I'm leaving in 6 hours and if you do not fire the prosecutor before I leave then you will not be getting the billion-dollar aid package approved by the US Congress. And guess what? The S-O-B was fired."

According to liars and deceivers, Shokin was corrupt, Trump was corrupt, General Flynn was corrupt, Senator Cruz is corrupt, Justice Thomas is corrupt, Jesus Christ was corrupt, and God is corrupt.
No. According to people who know them.
All of them have been proven or accused of corruption. Go away.
 
Why was Shokin fired just weeks after seizing Zlochevsky's assets? Because the IMF thought it was wrong to move against the mobster like that?

American officials on the take getting rich from Burisma bribes called Shokin incompetent and advocated for his removal just weeks after he moved to shut Burisma down. So what other crooked criminals were being protected by Shokin that were supposedly successfully prosecuted after his removal? Nobody.

The IMF did not threaten to hurt the Ukrainian president if he did not fire Shokin, Biden did. In Biden's own words, "I'm leaving in 6 hours and if you do not fire the prosecutor before I leave then you will not be getting the billion-dollar aid package approved by the US Congress. And guess what? The S-O-B was fired."

According to liars and deceivers, Shokin was corrupt, Trump was corrupt, General Flynn was corrupt, Senator Cruz is corrupt, Justice Thomas is corrupt, Jesus Christ was corrupt, and God is corrupt.

no one is talking here about trump flynn cruz thomas jesus or god, *****.

your attempt to deflect failed. lol
 
Why was Shokin fired just weeks after seizing Zlochevsky's assets? Because the IMF thought it was wrong to move against the mobster like that?

American officials on the take getting rich from Burisma bribes called Shokin incompetent and advocated for his removal just weeks after he moved to shut Burisma down. So what other crooked criminals were being protected by Shokin that were supposedly successfully prosecuted after his removal? Nobody.

The IMF did not threaten to hurt the Ukrainian president if he did not fire Shokin, Biden did. In Biden's own words, "I'm leaving in 6 hours and if you do not fire the prosecutor before I leave then you will not be getting the billion-dollar aid package approved by the US Congress. And guess what? The S-O-B was fired."

According to liars and deceivers, Shokin was corrupt, Trump was corrupt, General Flynn was corrupt, Senator Cruz is corrupt, Justice Thomas is corrupt, Jesus Christ was corrupt, and God is corrupt.

you'll have to prove shokin was responsible for seizing them.

which american officials were on the take? list them. loll

the IMF said he was corrupt. biden was in a position to impliment US policy. was imf in a position to implement us policy? no? lol

and yes, biden got a corrupt politician fired. that's a good thing, *****. lol
 
I can prove the facts I have detailed. You cannot because mere allegations, opinions, and story lines are not proof of anything.
During Vitaliy Yarema’s tenure, GPO “helped” to cancel seizure of Zlochevskyi’s millions held in the UK. Later under Viktor Shokin’s and Yuriy Lutsenko’s leadership, prosecutors for some reason stopped investigating illicit origin of those funds, but started checking payment of taxes. Also Lutsenko stopped the investigation regarding one of the subsidiary companies indirectly owned by Zlochevskyi.

In the meantime, prosecutors of Nazar Kholodnytskyi “forgot” to timely submit appeal concerning other case related to companies of ex-Minister.



yep, he was corrupt. lol
 
I can prove the facts I have detailed. You cannot because mere allegations, opinions, and story lines are not proof of anything.
David Sakvarelidze was five months into a new job as Ukraine’s reformist deputy chief prosecutor when a witness came forward with intelligence that would change the course of everything.

The witness, a sand producer in the Kiev region, complained of men extorting hundreds of thousands of dollars. It took a while to persuade the man to give evidence. But when he did, and the investigation began, the trail led to two of the country’s highest-placed prosecutors.


A search of the men’s apartments revealed a scene that looked like a comic heist: bags full of cash, diamonds and other precious stones. But that was not the only incriminating evidence. Documents seized at the time indicated the men appeared to have a connection to the top prosecutor in the land, Viktor Shokin.

Police found copies of Shokin’s passports, property registration certificates and even his licence to carry firearms. One of the two men, it transpired, was Shokin’s former driver who had subsequently climbed the ranks behind his boss.

For Sakvarelidze, there were clear suspicions the two men may have been carrying out the business of the chief. But his attempts to investigate were frustrated. Soon, he faced a corruption investigation himself. At loggerheads with Shokin, he was pushed out of his job within the year.


yep, shokin was corrupt. lol
 
I can prove the facts I have detailed. You cannot because mere allegations, opinions, and story lines are not proof of anything.

During Shokin’s 13 months in office, not one major figure was convicted. No oligarch. No politician. No ranking bureaucrat.

in a country full of corruption, shokin found..none? hahahahah

yep, shokin was corrupt. lol
 
I can prove the facts I have detailed. You cannot because mere allegations, opinions, and story lines are not proof of anything.
The approach of Shokin’s office to the Burisma investigations fell into a well-practiced pattern of corruption, the anonymous prosecutor says. By the time of Biden’s intervention, there were no active investigations to speak of.

“If the idea was to get a result on the Burisma case, Shokin would have put his top people on it,” he says. “That didn’t happen. The aims were different.”

“Neither Shokin nor Poroshenko wanted to investigate [Burisma owner Mykola] Zlochevsky,” says Sakvarelidze. “They simply began a criminal case, arrested a few assets, and began negotiating with the corruptioneer for a bribe.”

yep, shokin was corrupt.
 
I can prove the facts I have detailed. You cannot because mere allegations, opinions, and story lines are not proof of anything.
By the time Joe Biden arrived in Kiev in December 2015 to issue his infamous ultimatum, Shokin had lost the support of all but 3.5 per cent of Ukrainians.

Many MPs were also clamouring for his dismissal.

First among them was Yehor Soboliev, then a reformist MP of the Samopomich faction and chair of the parliamentary anti-corruption committee. In July 2015, Soboliev pressed for a vote on Shokin’s ousting. The arithmetic was always against him, as the general prosecutor was a figure of the ruling coalition. But he came surprisingly close, collecting 127 signatures from a required 150. Several members of the ruling parties broke ranks to support his move.

“We were under no illusions,” Soboliev tells The Independent. “We saw how Shokin had made an art of dumping cases while pretending to investigate. How he was a symbol of ineffectiveness and stalling. How he was the embodiment of the post-Soviet prosecutor.”

anti-corruption ukrainians wanted him gone. because they wanted to help hunter, not because he was corrupt? is that your theory? hahahahahhaha
 
Werbung:
I can prove the facts I have detailed. You cannot because mere allegations, opinions, and story lines are not proof of anything.

Daria Kaleniuk, executive director of the Kyiv-based Anti-Corruption Action Center (AntAC), told RFE/RL that Shokin "dumped important criminal investigations on corruption associated with [former President Viktor] Yanukovych, including the Burisma case."

another hunter fan? hahahahahhahahahahahhaha
 
Back
Top