"Gun Control" fanatics keep pushing schemes that would not have stopped any of the mass shootings

[dogtowner]

Sorry dear, vut ifthat was really true, you would already ve lost anyway! You and all good Americans have been financing a national defense system that is many times greater than any other country in e world and, whether youwant toacknowledge it or not, there is NO WAY that private citizens (especially as politically divided as they are today) could EVER arm themselves enough to fight the huge war machine YOU have been promoting all this time!

How will citizens, even armed with semi-automatic weapons, resist the forces of the Amrican Government military might?

Will a semi automatic be a, appropriate defense against drones? Against tanks? Against chemical weapons? Against smallsize nuclear war heads?

If you really believe that the semi automatics and the hand guns you so cherish for your defense are a match to "prevent government over reach" you are deluding yourself.

All those are good for is to kill many innocents, and maybe to help you commitsuicide when you realize how very powerless you are against what you seem to fear the most: the government of the USA

your assumption requires that the military would turn on it's citizen's. do you really think that fighter pilot will fire rockets on an American city ?

 

[Openmind]

your assumption requires that the military would turn on it's citizen's. do you really think that fighter pilot will fire rockets on an American city ?

That is the basis of military training!
And. . .let's say that the military do not follow order from their superiors. . . then why do YOU need to be armed?

If the military would not follow the order of the government. . .wouldn't they be the "REGULATED MILITIA" talked about in the second amendment?

If the "population" of the US can bring the military to their side. . .why do they need those "peanut" weapons such as semi-automatics?

Either way. . .individual gun ownership is a FALSE form of "protection!"

 

[Cruella]

NY Gov. Cuomo: Gun Confiscation “Could Be An Option”

 

[Dawkinsrocks]

Criminalising gun ownership would have massively reduced the death toll

There are 44 countries in Europe and most have strong penalties for gun ownership

But the people of these countries seem to manage fine and there are fewer shootings by a huge margin in all of them combined than in the US

There has been two or three mass shootings in total

That is just this year's count in the US

The NRA is for the criminally insane

 

[Gipper]

your assumption requires that the military would turn on it's citizen's. do you really think that fighter pilot will fire rockets on an American city ?

It is funny how leftists claim Americans don't need guns because they could never beat the US military. This belief seems based on their thinking the US military would use all means possible to silence descent. This is funny because the left has hamstrung our military in numerous ways in fighting the enemy around the world. Thus preventing the military from decimating the enemy. Yet they think the US military would (and should) massacre Americans in huge numbers, if Americans revolt. As unusual, they make no sense.

They also fail to understand a well armed citizenry is a check on the central governments power even when never used. This on top of the fact that most leftists find the Constitution a stupid document not worthy of abiding by...particularly the Second Amendment.

 

[dogtowner]

That is the basis of military training!
And. . .let's say that the military do not follow order from their superiors. . . then why do YOU need to be armed?

If the military would not follow the order of the government. . .wouldn't they be the "REGULATED MILITIA" talked about in the second amendment?

If the "population" of the US can bring the military to their side. . .why do they need those "peanut" weapons such as semi-automatics?

Either way. . .individual gun ownership is a FALSE form of "protection!"

we learned from theNazi trials to address "following orders" so your opening is incorrect.

weapons in citizen hands is not intended for use on soldiers rather pols as they are the tyrants.

 

[dogtowner]

NY Gov. Cuomo: Gun Confiscation “Could Be An Option”

"from my cold dead hands"

 

[Openmind]

we learned from theNazi trials to address "following orders" so your opening is incorrect.

weapons in citizen hands is not intended for use on soldiers rather pols as they are the tyrants.

Sure dear! And the US military will do nothing while the "militia" shoots at politicians, right?

Dream on!

By the way, did you see how "safe" people carrying guns are. . .even "trained" people. . .like policemen in a police station. . .and an "unarmed suspect" who so easily takes a gun from the "trained" policeman?

Yep. . .guns are nothing more than a security blanket. . .just about as effective for defense, but a lot more deadly!

 

[Openmind]

"from my cold dead hands"

Who knows. . . you may actually have your wish!

 

[dogtowner]

Sure dear! And the US military will do nothing while the "militia" shoots at politicians, right?

Dream on!

By the way, did you see how "safe" people carrying guns are. . .even "trained" people. . .like policemen in a police station. . .and an "unarmed suspect" who so easily takes a gun from the "trained" policeman?

Yep. . .guns are nothing more than a security blanket. . .just about as effective for defense, but a lot more deadly!

what did the military do about Giffords ? nothing. why ? its against the law and that means no soldier is obligated to follow an order to do so.

the point is to prevent pols who would be tyrants from using that tool.

why do you think bo is creating a domestic military force ? thats a lot of trouble and expense has to be a good reason for it.

 

[dogtowner]

Who knows. . . you may actually have your wish!

youre advocating murder ? thats illegal in case you didnt know it.

 

[Openmind]

what did the military do about Giffords ? nothing. why ? its against the law and that means no soldier is obligated to follow an order to do so.

the point is to prevent pols who would be tyrants from using that tool.

why do you think bo is creating a domestic military force ? thats a lot of trouble and expense has to be a good reason for it.

You mean. . .the "militia" our forefathers talked about to counteract the "evils" of governments are reduced to one mentally unstable young man with a gun? Because, face it, the Arizona incident was NOT about "a government over reach threatening the freedom of our citizens!"

So what are you ranting about? Obviously the military would not be called to "put down" a single gunman EVEN IF he was trying to start a "revolution" against politicians!

And, by taking Gifford as a (false equivalency) example. . .do you mean to say that Gabby Gifford was one of those "rotten, unethical, destructive" politicians that would be a danger to US citizens? Or are you suggesting that her shooter was a "upstanding member of a regulated militia" as intended by our forefather?

You seem so very confused! Need a rest maybe?

And where is that "domestic military force? created by the President?

 

[Openmind]

youre advocating murder ? thats illegal in case you didnt know it.

Advocating murder? Where did I say that?

YOU mention "out of my cold, dead hands." and all I am saying is that. . more than one gunmen had exactly that happen to him. Are you volunteering for the same destiny?

Remember, it wasn't MY wish. . .it was YOURS!

 

[dogtowner]

You mean. . .the "militia" our forefathers talked about to counteract the "evils" of governments are reduced to one mentally unstable young man with a gun? Because, face it, the Arizona incident was NOT about "a government over reach threatening the freedom of our citizens!"

So what are you ranting about? Obviously the military would not be called to "put down" a single gunman EVEN IF he was trying to start a "revolution" against politicians!

And, by taking Gifford as a (false equivalency) example. . .do you mean to say that Gabby Gifford was one of those "rotten, unethical, destructive" politicians that would be a danger to US citizens? Or are you suggesting that her shooter was a "upstanding member of a regulated militia" as intended by our forefather?

You seem so very confused! Need a rest maybe?

And where is that "domestic military force? created by the President?

Civilian Expeditionary Workforce

but how quaint of you to miss the point

 

[Openmind]

Civilian Expeditionary Workforce

but how quaint of you to miss the point

You mean THIS THREAT to our freedom?

The Department of Defense deploys civilians alongside the US Military to provide crucial functions such as Senior Cultural Advisors, Logisticians, Contract Administrators, Public Affairs Specialists, and Engineers. There are many different roles, but a common thread unifies the Civilian Expeditionary Workforce (CEW): their investment in making the world a more secure and better place.



http://www.cpms.osd.mil/expeditionary/

Wow! Talk about paranoia! Funny how the "Domestic MILITARY force" suddenly became the "CIVILIAN Expeditionary workforce!"

By the way, you too can be part of the Civilian Expeditionary Workforce!
And NO GUN needs to be involved!