Purpose of man's existence

[The Sage of Main Street]

Proof for God's existence is non-existent!
Proof for God's non-exisence is non-existent!
Man comes from one door and exists from another. He is obloged to come into this world and to exit. He has a certain form and specific shape and colour. He has a specific size with a specific weight and hieght. Has a life time to live during which he is obliged to develop in a certain way. He has myriads of apparatuses that constitute his physical, mental, psychological and spiritual being. In all these Man has not word to say. In all these he has no choice but to be what he is. All conditions of survival are provided for him, his means of survival, his nouriture his means of lodgings. he only has to work for it and it is all there. He did not have anything to do with all this. All is preplanned and all is preprogrammed. But man is an ungrateful bastard to his own creator.
Yet, with his intentional arrogance and self-boasting he blinds himself to the reality of his existence.
However, it is just this fact that there is definitely not one proof, evidence or refrence nor a solid argument for God[s existence. A donkey on two legs, crippled in the body, mind and soul like Stephen Hawking decides out of his utter blindness, as a biased physicist, that 'God is not necessary for the creation of the universe'. It is precisely this that tells you how arrogant a human beikng although crippled in every way deny the existence of the creator=cause.
Nothing, on the other hand proves that God does not exist.
Humans are here, by obligation, in order to look into the universe and decide for own selves whether or not their convictions tell them which way to go< belief or disbelief in a creator-cause namely God. Thus, humanity is divided into huge classifications< those who believe in God and those who do not. Two categories of human beings and there cannot be a third one. Those who are sceptic belong to the category of disbelievers until they believe.
Therefore, it can be argued that man exists in oder to encounter with the universe, an obligatory thing for every human being and then he must, by obligation make up his mind whether to believe in God, or not. He has a span of life. The proof for this perspective is that every human being confronts the universe and makes up his convictions of disbelief or belief in a God. Therefore, and for lack of any evidence for or against the existence of a God, man recoils upon his own convictions and must, by obligation make the premeditative choice between belief and disbelief in God. No has escaped it and no one dies excpet having made his or her choice. We enter without a choice and we exit having made the choice!
Dr. Mardini

He's Making a List, Checking It Twice. Gonna Find Out If You've Been Naughty or Nice.

Using the same kind of dishonest reasoning, explaining everything by claiming his supernatural powers, no one can prove that Santa Claus does not exist.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

Again, the Bible is a largely but a bunch of silly myths: It is not possible to sculpt a human being out of mud, and even less possible to create a woman out of one rib. Snakes cannot talk and have never been able to talk; the Hebrews were never a large slave population in Egypt; the Earth was clearly created many millions of years after the Universe. There was never a Great Flood, and Jesus is most likely dead and gone and will never return.

 

[mark francis]

Again, the Bible is a largely but a bunch of silly myths: It is not possible to sculpt a human being out of mud, and even less possible to create a woman out of one rib. Snakes cannot talk and have never been able to talk; the Hebrews were never a large slave population in Egypt; the Earth was clearly created many millions of years after the Universe. There was never a Great Flood, and Jesus is most likely dead and gone and will never return.

Unlike stupid humans God can do anything He wants to do and has done everything He said He did.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

Unlike stupid humans God can do anything He wants to do and has done everything He said He did.

The "God" character in the Bible is a serious dolt. Supposedly, he has total wisdom and total power, but when he decides that all humans except members of Noah's family are not worthy of survival, he floods the entire planet.

Obviously, this is a very poor solution, as the way to get rid of humans is with a fatal virus or bacterial plague. Just hide Noah and his family away for a year or so until the plague has wiped out all the bad people and then turn them loose to multiply the planet with good people. There is no need to build an ark or to waste the effort to round up all the animals.

If course, this is just a myth, there has never been a total flood on this planet, because there is not enough water for that.

 

[mark francis]

The "God" character in the Bible is a serious dolt. Supposedly, he has total wisdom and total power, but when he decides that all humans except members of Noah's family are not worthy of survival, he floods the entire planet.

Obviously, this is a very poor solution, as the way to get rid of humans is with a fatal virus or bacterial plague. Just hide Noah and his family away for a year or so until the plague has wiped out all the bad people and then turn them loose to multiply the planet with good people. There is no need to build an ark or to waste the effort to round up all the animals.

If course, this is just a myth, there has never been a total flood on this planet, because there is not enough water for that.

Your wide range of speculations, assumptions and confusions cannot be supported by facts and evidence.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

Your wide range of speculations, assumptions and confusions cannot be supported by facts and evidence.

Could an all knowing, all powerful deity be ignorant that it is possible for him to create a virus or bacteria that could make humans extinct?

How is a worldwide flood a better solution to "God"'s desire to nearly wipe out an entire species?

There are no facts or evidence on your side of this argument.

 

[mark francis]

Could an all knowing, all powerful deity be ignorant that it is possible for him to create a virus or bacteria that could make humans extinct?

How is a worldwide flood a better solution to "God"'s desire to nearly wipe out an entire species?

There are no facts or evidence on your side of this argument.

The ignorant and unlearned reject God because God does not make sense to them, and yet they believe the universe somehow created itself with no prior materials to work with and no help from any intelligent designer. Go figger.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

Why is a self-designing Universe less logical than an Eternal Omnipotent Being that waited billions of years from the beginning of the Universe and the creation of our teensy little planet?

Are humans so significant that it was necessary to create a vast universe so that one species on one small planet out on an unfashionable arm of a rather normal galaxy to sustain them?

That is like building all of California so that you have a place for a small aquarium.

There COULD BE some sort of creator, but the one called "God" in the Bible is obviously part of a work of fiction.

It makes no sense at all.

 

[mark francis]

Why is a self-designing Universe less logical than an Eternal Omnipotent Being that waited billions of years from the beginning of the Universe and the creation of our teensy little planet?

Are humans so significant that it was necessary to create a vast universe so that one species on one small planet out on an unfashionable arm of a rather normal galaxy to sustain them?

That is like building all of California so that you have a place for a small aquarium.

There COULD BE some sort of creator, but the one called "God" in the Bible is obviously part of a work of fiction.

It makes no sense at all.

Failure to comprehend scientific restraints against flawed human origin theories do not disprove God.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

There is no such thing as a "scientific restraint". The scientific conclusion about God is that there is no way of proving or disproving the existence of God.

The scientific method would be to create a planet without a God, and then compare it with the planet we inhabit. We are not capable of creating such a planet, and almost certainly never will be.

Science has no position on the existence of God, other than stating that God's existence cannot be proven nor disproven.

There is ample proof that a large number of statements about the Earth, the stars, the Sun and other planets in the Bible are simply false.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Unlike stupid humans God can do anything He wants to do and has done everything He said He did.

Self-Empowering Liars Proved That Snakes Can Talk

God never said anything. Religious fanatics appointed themselves as His unauthorized spokesmen.

 

[mark francis]

Self-Empowering Liars Proved That Snakes Can Talk

God never said anything. Religious fanatics appointed themselves as His unauthorized spokesmen.

That is one common theological view among thousands of varying human differences of opinions.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

The ignorant and unlearned reject God because God does not make sense to them, and yet they believe the universe somehow created itself with no prior materials to work with and no help from any intelligent designer. Go figger.

"None of the Above" Never a Choice by Cliques That Place Themselves Above Us

You have no right to assume that the materials weren't always there, especially if you believe that your god never had a beginning, either. Natural forces, which didn't need a Creator or a Director, made things change into the universe we have now, which isn't the only one out there. If you can believe in Heaven, rationalists can believe in a fourth spatial dimension.

Besides, though not allowed to be proposed by either false religion or false science, there is such a possibility as Intelligent Self-Design, which overcomes the odds against evolution by random chance or an outside personal Creator. If God helps those who help themselves, there's no need for a God in the first place.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Why is a self-designing Universe less logical than an Eternal Omnipotent Being that waited billions of years from the beginning of the Universe and the creation of our teensy little planet?

Are humans so significant that it was necessary to create a vast universe so that one species on one small planet out on an unfashionable arm of a rather normal galaxy to sustain them?

That is like building all of California so that you have a place for a small aquarium.

There COULD BE some sort of creator, but the one called "God" in the Bible is obviously part of a work of fiction.

It makes no sense at all.

Thou Shalt Not Have Strange Gods

If man is created in that God's image, we should feel either insulted or hopelessly stupid.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

Self-Empowering Liars Proved That Snakes Can Talk

God never said anything. Religious fanatics appointed themselves as His unauthorized spokesmen.

Lamentably, there were no voice recording devices until the late 1800's

In previous times, religious figures, notably the Virgin Mary appeared at rather regular intervals.
At the present time, a huge percentage of the world's population is equipped with cellphones that have cameras, but the number of apparitions of the Virgin and other religious figures are quite few.

"None of the Above" Never a Choice by Cliques That Place Themselves Above Us

You have no right to assume that the materials weren't always there, especially if you believe that your god never had a beginning, either. Natural forces, which didn't need a Creator or a Director, made things change into the universe we have now, which isn't the only one out there. If you can believe in Heaven, rationalists can believe in a fourth spatial dimension.

Besides, though not allowed to be proposed by either false religion or false science, there is such a possibility as Intelligent Self-Design, which overcomes the odds against evolution by random chance or an outside personal Creator. If God helps those who help themselves, there's no need for a God in the first place.

That is one common theological view among thousands of varying human differences of opinions.

The Bible says quite clearly that a talking snake lured Eve and Adam into committing the "Original Sin", a necessary device to priests enjoying social prestige, no heavy lifting, and chicken dinners at regular intervals.