Purpose of man's existence

[The Sage of Main Street]

There is no such thing as a "scientific restraint". The scientific conclusion about God is that there is no way of proving or disproving the existence of God.

The scientific method would be to create a planet without a God, and then compare it with the planet we inhabit. We are not capable of creating such a planet, and almost certainly never will be.

Science has no position on the existence of God, other than stating that God's existence cannot be proven nor disproven.

We Can Prove a Negative If It Is Ridiculous

That is no excuse for agnosticism. Some theories are so stupid they don't need to be refuted. Can anyone be agnostic about the existence of Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny?

 

[mark francis]

There is no such thing as a "scientific restraint". The scientific conclusion about God is that there is no way of proving or disproving the existence of God.

The scientific method would be to create a planet without a God, and then compare it with the planet we inhabit. We are not capable of creating such a planet, and almost certainly never will be.

Science has no position on the existence of God, other than stating that God's existence cannot be proven nor disproven.

There is ample proof that a large number of statements about the Earth, the stars, the Sun and other planets in the Bible are simply false.

Science restrains mythology, speculations, assumptions, guesses, unproven theories and the like from being accepted as scientific facts.

 

[mark francis]

"None of the Above" Never a Choice by Cliques That Place Themselves Above Us

You have no right to assume that the materials weren't always there, especially if you believe that your god never had a beginning, either. Natural forces, which didn't need a Creator or a Director, made things change into the universe we have now, which isn't the only one out there. If you can believe in Heaven, rationalists can believe in a fourth spatial dimension.

Besides, though not allowed to be proposed by either false religion or false science, there is such a possibility as Intelligent Self-Design, which overcomes the odds against evolution by random chance or an outside personal Creator. If God helps those who help themselves, there's no need for a God in the first place.

I have every right to assume that matter and energy are not eternal, given the scientific facts about the temporal nature of deteriorating bodies in the universe.

 

[saltydancindave]

I have every right to assume that matter and energy are not eternal, given the scientific facts about the temporal nature of deteriorating bodies in the universe.

Looking like the right to assume scientific facts of human reproduction medical pseudoscience still contradicts Christiananality pedophilia suicidal super ego sociopsychopathilogical homicidal human farming.......

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

Science restrains mythology, speculations, assumptions, guesses, unproven theories and the like from being accepted as scientific facts.

Science restrains mythology, speculations, assumptions, guesses, unproven theories and the like from being accepted as scientific facts.

The purpose of science is to determine the true facts about the physical universe. It simply ignores mythology, speculations, lore and what cannot be proven.

Science is not an arbiter of anything, it is a PROCESS by which we determine the truth base on physical evidence.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

I have every right to assume that matter and energy are not eternal, given the scientific facts about the temporal nature of deteriorating bodies in the universe.

Entropy Is Misanthropy

They deteriorate into other bodies. There never was a nothing, and there never will be that state of matter.

 

[mark francis]

The purpose of science is to determine the true facts about the physical universe. It simply ignores mythology, speculations, lore and what cannot be proven.

Science is not an arbiter of anything, it is a PROCESS by which we determine the truth base on physical evidence.

The godless big bang theory and uncaused abiogenesis assumption are two unscientific speculations that ignore contradictions to the narratives and assumptions.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

The purpose of science is to determine the true facts about the physical universe. It simply ignores mythology, speculations, lore and what cannot be proven.

Science is not an arbiter of anything, it is a PROCESS by which we determine the truth base on physical evidence.

Floundering at Its Foundation

Science has a tendency to be misdirected by faddish paradigms.

 

[mark francis]

Entropy Is Misanthropy

They deteriorate into other bodies. There never was a nothing, and there never will be that state of matter.

Interesting astrological theory.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

The godless big bang theory and uncaused abiogenesis assumption are two unscientific speculations that ignore contradictions to the narratives and assumptions.

The Big Bang (what a childish term) is even more irrational than Creationism. As for abiogenesis, if dead matter such as food keeps people alive, why can't inanimate matter turn into living matter?

What is the difference between the Blade-Runner and the replicant?

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

Floundering at Its Foundation

Science has a tendency to be misdirected by faddish paradigms.

That is NOT TRUE. You don't understand how science works.

The Scientific Method poses questions and then postulates possible explanations, then attempts to prove the explanations to be false.

 

[mark francis]

That is NOT TRUE. You don't understand how science works.

The Scientific Method poses questions and then postulates possible explanations, then attempts to prove the explanations to be false.

Unbelievers get together to formulate theories to explain the miracle of origins in ways that eliminate God, and then publish their results through methods they have created to give the dishonest appearance of irrefutability to their unscientific theories.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

That is NOT TRUE. You don't understand how science works.

The Scientific Method poses questions and then postulates possible explanations, then attempts to prove the explanations to be false.

New Church for Cretins

You're canonizing escapist geeks who run away from practical value because they have none themselves.