OldTrapper
Well-Known Member
Considering that was never once brought up in the trial, it is just that, "your opinion" of something that isn't so and did not happen!
Considering the position he was in, and where he allegedly had the gun at, I could see no other way he could have gotten the gun out. As to the prosecutor, or defense, bringing it up, since Zimmerman never testified, and there were no eye witnesses, why would it be brought up? It would have been dismissed as strictly hearsay, or speculation.
Zimmerman was "retreating" back to his vehicle when he was confronted and then instantly attacked by Martin. Your account of what happened that night is not factual and not what was discussed in the court room. Most likely because it is YOUR racist and bigoted views that prevents YOU from seeing the real facts in this case.
There is no proof of that either. It is entirely speculation as to where Zimmerman was going since he never testified. Phone records indicate Z was following M when he called 911. When asked if he was doing so he said yes, was told he did not have to do so, and then we hear he lost sight of M. Question then becomes why did Z get out of the car at all? He was asked the location of where he was, and that was easily determined by street signs. If this group followed the guidelines established by national rules for neighborhood watches, one discovers Z violated several of the rules one of which he was alone, and the second of which was he was armed.
As to my "racist bigoted" opinion, I guess logic could be called that by one lacking any meaningful insight.