WE'RE GONNA NEED TO WALL-OFF TEXASS, SOON!!!!!

Not only me but every court didn't believe you morons lol
You have not convinced me that courts examined the internal records of voting machines and ruled that they were convinced no machines were corrupted in the 2020 election.
 
Werbung:
You have not convinced me that courts examined the internal records of voting machines and ruled that they were convinced no machines were corrupted in the 2020 election.



of course, no one can prove that "no machines were corrupted", just like you morons can't prove that no mcahines were corrupted in 2016 to give trump the election. duh. but since no credible evidence was found to show that biden wasn't correctly elected, he's the president and you can whine all you want but courts laughed at you.
 
Baloney. America has no business using voting machines owned by Democrats, programmed by Democrats, operated by Democrats, and protected from investigation by Democrats.
machines aren't "owned by democrats" *****. they are owned by municipalities. god you're stupid. lol.
 
of course, no one can prove that "no machines were corrupted", just like you morons can't prove that no mcahines were corrupted in 2016 to give trump the election. duh. but since no credible evidence was found to show that biden wasn't correctly elected, he's the president and you can whine all you want but courts laughed at you.
Nobody can say the machines were or were not corrupted where no examinations of the internal memories of the machines were never examined.
 
machines aren't "owned by democrats" *****. they are owned by municipalities. god you're stupid. lol.
Wrong. Dominion has obtained court verification that neither states nor political parties have the right to examine the computer drives of Dominion machines.,
 
Nobody can say the machines were or were not corrupted where no examinations of the internal memories of the machines were never examined.

no can can say they weren't corrupted in 2016 allowing trump to win either. lol.

just like there is no evidence it happened in 2016, there is none in 2020 either. that's how the law works, *****.
 
Courts have upheld Dominion's claims that its proprietary software is protected by law. That means that nobody can prove the machines were corrupted and nobody is offering proof the machines were not corrupted.

Evidence of Vote Manipulation Redacted from Dominion Audit (visiontimes.com)

Home » US » Evidence of Vote Manipulation Redacted from Dominion Audit

Evidence of Vote Manipulation Redacted from Dominion Audit

By Neil Campbell

Published: December 20, 2020

An audit of Dominion machines show massive fraud. (Image: YouTube / Screenshot)

Dominion Voting Systems’ Ranked Choice Voting algorithm (RCV) was in play in Michigan’s Antrim County elections, according to Russel Ramsland Jr., lead analyst for the Plaintiff in a court-ordered audit of Dominion’s systems.

The suit between a private citizen and Antrim County requested injunctions on the Nov. 3 presidential election result because the tally took “votes cast for President Donald Trump and instead counted them for Presidential Candidate Joe Biden.”

Ramsland told Newsmax’s Greg Kelly Reports that the evidence that the RCV algorithm was in play was ordered redacted by the presiding judge. “The original report had log evidence that we published in the report to show exactly what we did and exactly the findings. Now, those did ultimately get redacted. And so now, the complaint is ‘well, but there’s no real proof’ and Dominion says ‘no, these things can’t be done.’”

State defense lawyers requested the Judge require the redactio
ns to protect Dominion’s proprietary source code from being published in the screenshots, arguing the release of the code could be a security issue.
 
Courts have upheld Dominion's claims that its proprietary software is protected by law. That means that nobody can prove the machines were corrupted and nobody is offering proof the machines were not corrupted.

Evidence of Vote Manipulation Redacted from Dominion Audit (visiontimes.com)

Home » US » Evidence of Vote Manipulation Redacted from Dominion Audit

Evidence of Vote Manipulation Redacted from Dominion Audit

By Neil Campbell

Published: December 20, 2020

An audit of Dominion machines show massive fraud. (Image: YouTube / Screenshot)

Dominion Voting Systems’ Ranked Choice Voting algorithm (RCV) was in play in Michigan’s Antrim County elections, according to Russel Ramsland Jr., lead analyst for the Plaintiff in a court-ordered audit of Dominion’s systems.

The suit between a private citizen and Antrim County requested injunctions on the Nov. 3 presidential election result because the tally took “votes cast for President Donald Trump and instead counted them for Presidential Candidate Joe Biden.”

Ramsland told Newsmax’s Greg Kelly Reports that the evidence that the RCV algorithm was in play was ordered redacted by the presiding judge. “The original report had log evidence that we published in the report to show exactly what we did and exactly the findings. Now, those did ultimately get redacted. And so now, the complaint is ‘well, but there’s no real proof’ and Dominion says ‘no, these things can’t be done.’”

State defense lawyers requested the Judge require the redactio
ns to protect Dominion’s proprietary source code from being published in the screenshots, arguing the release of the code could be a security issue.
Ramsland the ***** who confused states lol
 
Courts have upheld Dominion's claims that its proprietary software is protected by law. That means that nobody can prove the machines were corrupted and nobody is offering proof the machines were not corrupted.

Evidence of Vote Manipulation Redacted from Dominion Audit (visiontimes.com)

Home » US » Evidence of Vote Manipulation Redacted from Dominion Audit

Evidence of Vote Manipulation Redacted from Dominion Audit

By Neil Campbell

Published: December 20, 2020

An audit of Dominion machines show massive fraud. (Image: YouTube / Screenshot)

Dominion Voting Systems’ Ranked Choice Voting algorithm (RCV) was in play in Michigan’s Antrim County elections, according to Russel Ramsland Jr., lead analyst for the Plaintiff in a court-ordered audit of Dominion’s systems.

The suit between a private citizen and Antrim County requested injunctions on the Nov. 3 presidential election result because the tally took “votes cast for President Donald Trump and instead counted them for Presidential Candidate Joe Biden.”

Ramsland told Newsmax’s Greg Kelly Reports that the evidence that the RCV algorithm was in play was ordered redacted by the presiding judge. “The original report had log evidence that we published in the report to show exactly what we did and exactly the findings. Now, those did ultimately get redacted. And so now, the complaint is ‘well, but there’s no real proof’ and Dominion says ‘no, these things can’t be done.’”

State defense lawyers requested the Judge require the redactio
ns to protect Dominion’s proprietary source code from being published in the screenshots, arguing the release of the code could be a security issue.
Mr. Ramsland further claims that the scanner log shows that “RCV or Ranked
Choice Voting Algorithm was enabled” which “allows the user to apply a weighted
numerical value to candidates and change the overall result” (¶J.2). In reality,
although some log entries reference the voting system’s RCV feature, they do not
indicate that it was enabled. The EMS and memory card data data show that RCV
was not in use, as do the results of the hand recount of the presidential contest

Not even in use he is a *****

Hand recount confirmed results ***** lol
 
no can can say they weren't corrupted in 2016 allowing trump to win either. lol.

just like there is no evidence it happened in 2016, there is none in 2020 either. that's how the law works, *****.
Most Americans are not happy that Dominion has the power to alter votes in a way that is protected from discovery by copywrite laws.

Cracking Dominion’s Source Code — A National Security Threat Since 2003 (substack.com)

The problem found with Microsoft components (DWG) is the use of dynamic coding which can be used to change ballot results. From the beginning (1997), Bob Urosevich and Barry Herron insisted this was not subject to a source code audit.
 
Courts have upheld Dominion's claims that its proprietary software is protected by law. That means that nobody can prove the machines were corrupted and nobody is offering proof the machines were not corrupted.

Evidence of Vote Manipulation Redacted from Dominion Audit (visiontimes.com)

Home » US » Evidence of Vote Manipulation Redacted from Dominion Audit

Evidence of Vote Manipulation Redacted from Dominion Audit

By Neil Campbell

Published: December 20, 2020

An audit of Dominion machines show massive fraud. (Image: YouTube / Screenshot)

Dominion Voting Systems’ Ranked Choice Voting algorithm (RCV) was in play in Michigan’s Antrim County elections, according to Russel Ramsland Jr., lead analyst for the Plaintiff in a court-ordered audit of Dominion’s systems.

The suit between a private citizen and Antrim County requested injunctions on the Nov. 3 presidential election result because the tally took “votes cast for President Donald Trump and instead counted them for Presidential Candidate Joe Biden.”

Ramsland told Newsmax’s Greg Kelly Reports that the evidence that the RCV algorithm was in play was ordered redacted by the presiding judge. “The original report had log evidence that we published in the report to show exactly what we did and exactly the findings. Now, those did ultimately get redacted. And so now, the complaint is ‘well, but there’s no real proof’ and Dominion says ‘no, these things can’t be done.’”

State defense lawyers requested the Judge require the redactio
ns to protect Dominion’s proprietary source code from being published in the screenshots, arguing the release of the code could be a security issue.
Nobody has proof they were corrupted which is why you morons lost every court case
 
Most Americans are not happy that Dominion has the power to alter votes in a way that is protected from discovery by copywrite laws.

Cracking Dominion’s Source Code — A National Security Threat Since 2003 (substack.com)

The problem found with Microsoft components (DWG) is the use of dynamic coding which can be used to change ballot results. From the beginning (1997), Bob Urosevich and Barry Herron insisted this was not subject to a source code audit.
Most Americans? Lol proof?
 
Most Americans are not happy that Dominion has the power to alter votes in a way that is protected from discovery by copywrite laws.

Cracking Dominion’s Source Code — A National Security Threat Since 2003 (substack.com)

The problem found with Microsoft components (DWG) is the use of dynamic coding which can be used to change ballot results. From the beginning (1997), Bob Urosevich and Barry Herron insisted this was not subject to a source code audit.
Since hand counts matched the electroniccounts ***** no votes were changed duh
 
Werbung:
Courts have upheld Dominion's claims that its proprietary software is protected by law. That means that nobody can prove the machines were corrupted and nobody is offering proof the machines were not corrupted.

Evidence of Vote Manipulation Redacted from Dominion Audit (visiontimes.com)

Home » US » Evidence of Vote Manipulation Redacted from Dominion Audit

Evidence of Vote Manipulation Redacted from Dominion Audit

By Neil Campbell

Published: December 20, 2020

An audit of Dominion machines show massive fraud. (Image: YouTube / Screenshot)

Dominion Voting Systems’ Ranked Choice Voting algorithm (RCV) was in play in Michigan’s Antrim County elections, according to Russel Ramsland Jr., lead analyst for the Plaintiff in a court-ordered audit of Dominion’s systems.

The suit between a private citizen and Antrim County requested injunctions on the Nov. 3 presidential election result because the tally took “votes cast for President Donald Trump and instead counted them for Presidential Candidate Joe Biden.”

Ramsland told Newsmax’s Greg Kelly Reports that the evidence that the RCV algorithm was in play was ordered redacted by the presiding judge. “The original report had log evidence that we published in the report to show exactly what we did and exactly the findings. Now, those did ultimately get redacted. And so now, the complaint is ‘well, but there’s no real proof’ and Dominion says ‘no, these things can’t be done.’”

State defense lawyers requested the Judge require the redactio
ns to protect Dominion’s proprietary source code from being published in the screenshots, arguing the release of the code could be a security issue.

Mr. Ramsland claims that on “November 21, 2020, an unauthorized user
unsuccessfully attempted to zero out election results” (¶B.17). The only evidence
he offers for this assertion is an EMS log file entry that reads “EmsLogger - There
is no permission to {0}”, which he claims “is direct proof of an attempt to tamper
with evidence” (¶J.8). This is absurd and misleading. A programmer would
immediately recognize that {0} is merely a placeholder, in this case one that was
intended to be replaced with a description of the attempted action [26]. It has
nothing to do with “zeroing” election results.
Citing another error message logged to the EMS, “XmlException: The ’ ’
character, hexadecimal value 0x20, cannot be included in a name”, Mr. Ramsland
concludes, “Bottom line is that this is a calibration that rejects the vote” (¶J.8).
This is completely baseless. The error refers to a field name in a data structure
(an XML entity), which the relevant programming standard does not allow to
contain a space. It has no relation to the names of contests or candidates, and
there is nothing that suggests the error resulted in a rejected vote.


Ramsland is a ***** who made up lies to justify his fee
In other words a typical republican
 
Back
Top