Courts have upheld Dominion's claims that its proprietary software is protected by law. That means that nobody can prove the machines were corrupted and nobody is offering proof the machines were not corrupted.
Evidence of Vote Manipulation Redacted from Dominion Audit (visiontimes.com)
Home » US » Evidence of Vote Manipulation Redacted from Dominion Audit
Evidence of Vote Manipulation Redacted from Dominion Audit
By Neil Campbell
Published: December 20, 2020
An audit of Dominion machines show massive fraud. (Image: YouTube / Screenshot)
Dominion Voting Systems’ Ranked Choice Voting algorithm (RCV) was in play in Michigan’s Antrim County elections, according to Russel Ramsland Jr., lead analyst for the Plaintiff in a court-ordered audit of Dominion’s systems.
The suit between a private citizen and Antrim County requested injunctions on the Nov. 3 presidential election result because the tally took “votes cast for President Donald Trump and instead counted them for Presidential Candidate Joe Biden.”
Ramsland told Newsmax’s Greg Kelly Reports that the evidence that the RCV algorithm was in play was ordered redacted by the presiding judge. “The original report had log evidence that we published in the report to show exactly what we did and exactly the findings. Now, those did ultimately get redacted. And so now, the complaint is ‘well, but there’s no real proof’ and Dominion says ‘no, these things can’t be done.’”
State defense lawyers requested the Judge require the redactions to protect Dominion’s proprietary source code from being published in the screenshots, arguing the release of the code could be a security issue.
Mr. Ramsland claims that on “November 21, 2020, an unauthorized user
unsuccessfully attempted to zero out election results” (¶B.17). The only evidence
he offers for this assertion is an EMS log file entry that reads “EmsLogger - There
is no permission to {0}”, which he claims “is direct proof of an attempt to tamper
with evidence” (¶J.8). This is absurd and misleading. A programmer would
immediately recognize that {0} is merely a placeholder, in this case one that was
intended to be replaced with a description of the attempted action [26]. It has
nothing to do with “zeroing” election results.
Citing another error message logged to the EMS, “XmlException: The ’ ’
character, hexadecimal value 0x20, cannot be included in a name”, Mr. Ramsland
concludes, “Bottom line is that this is a calibration that rejects the vote” (¶J.8).
This is completely baseless. The error refers to a field name in a data structure
(an XML entity), which the relevant programming standard does not allow to
contain a space. It has no relation to the names of contests or candidates, and
there is nothing that suggests the error resulted in a rejected vote.
Ramsland is a ***** who made up lies to justify his fee
In other words a typical republican