WE'RE GONNA NEED TO WALL-OFF TEXASS, SOON!!!!!

Werbung:
pjmret said:
Mr. Ramsland further claims that the scanner log shows that “RCV or Ranked
Choice Voting Algorithm was enabled” which “allows the user to apply a weighted
numerical value to candidates and change the overall result” (¶J.2). In reality,
although some log entries reference the voting system’s RCV feature, they do not
indicate that it was enabled. The EMS and memory card data data show that RCV
was not in use, as do the results of the hand recount of the presidential contest

Not even in use he is a *****

Hand recount confirmed results ***** lol
Click to expand...
A Dominion official was reported by a whistleblower to have stated Dominion was not going to allow Trump to win. Dominion likely played a key role in stealing the election for the lackluster Biden and have been successful in preventing all but a few investigations into the inner workings of their machines by claiming the info is legally protected from examination by propriety laws.

US Election – vote ‘adjudication’ explained: it’s a rort | Pursue Democracy

All six swing states still in dispute—Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, in addition to Georgia, Nevada, and Arizona—were won by Trump as of midnight on Election Day, and all experienced a massive “blue-shift” in the early morning hours of Nov. 4.

Now we learn, thanks to the court-ordered forensic audit of the Dominion servers in Antrim County, Michigan, that the Dominion software somehow experienced an astounding 68.05 percent error rate in electronic tabulation log events (pdf).

“We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.”-
Joe Biden *

The Election Assistance Commission (originally the Federal Election Commission) allows a maximum error rate of just 0.0008 percent (pdf). That is, the 68.05 percent audited error rate for Dominion software in Antrim County is a staggering 85,000 times the allowable error rate.

The forensic report understandably concluded that Dominion software was “intentionally designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results.”
 
pjmret said:
Nobody has proof they were corrupted which is why you morons lost every court case
Click to expand...
The reason that practicably nobody has uncovered fraud in Dominion machines is because Dominion has been successful in preventing nearly every effort to examine the security logs of their machines.

Cracking Dominion’s Source Code — A National Security Threat Since 2003 (substack.com)

The problem found with Microsoft components (DWG) is the use of dynamic coding which can be used to change ballot results. From the beginning (1997), Bob Urosevich and Barry Herron insisted this was not subject to a source code audit.

The same Microsoft ACCESS program is shown above to swiftly and undetectably change the audit trail and results is what Diebold/ES&S and Diebold/Dominion demand protection for.

When Diebold (using Dominion’s current source code) was audited by Metamor for the FEC/NASED, they found the security of GEMS and the integrity of the audit trails were compromised because Microsoft Access can easily change that audit trail.
 
pjmret said:
Most Americans? Lol proof?
Click to expand...

www.rasmussenreports.com

Election Integrity: Most Voters Still Suspect Cheating

Protecting the integrity of elections remains a high priority for American voters, most of whom still suspect there was cheating in the 2020 presidential election.
www.rasmussenreports.com www.rasmussenreports.com

Election Integrity: Most Voters Still Suspect Cheating​

Wednesday, May 25, 2022

Protecting the integrity of elections remains a high priority for American voters, most of whom still suspect there was cheating in the 2020 presidential election.
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 55% of Likely U.S. voters believe cheating likely affected the outcome of the 2020 presidential election, including 39% who think it’s Very Likely. Thirty-nine percent (39%) don’t think cheating affected the 2020 election, including 28% who say it’s Not At All Likely. These findings are almost identical to results in March. (To see survey question wording, click here.)
 
pjmret said:
Since hand counts matched the electroniccounts ***** no votes were changed duh
Click to expand...
Not true. Machine tampering has been perfected so that the fraudulent results are covered by altering the logs to make them match published counts that are themselves fraudulent.

Cracking Dominion’s Source Code — A National Security Threat Since 2003 (substack.com)

The contents of these files amounted to a virtual handbook for vote-tampering: They contained diagrams of remote communications setups, passwords, encryption keys, source code, user manuals, testing protocols, and simulators, as well as files loaded with votes and voting machine software. Diebold Elections Systems AccuVote systems use software called “GEMS,” and this system is used in 37 states. The voting system works like this: Voters vote at the precinct, running their ballot through an optical scan, or entering their vote on a touch screen. After the polls close, poll workers transmit the votes that have been accumulated to the county office. They do this by modem. At the county office, there is a “host computer” with a program on it called GEMS. GEMS receives the incoming votes and stores them in a vote ledger.

But in the files we examined, which were created by Diebold employees and/or county officials, we learned that the Diebold program used another set of books with a copy of what is in vote ledger 1. And at the same time, it made yet a third vote ledger with another copy. Apparently, the Elections Supervisor never sees these three sets of books. All she sees is the reports she can run: Election summary (totals, county wide) or a detail report (totals for each precinct). She has no way of knowing that her GEMS program is using multiple sets of books, because the GEMS interface draws its data from an Access database, which is hidden.

And here is what is quite odd: On the programs we tested, the Election summary (totals, county wide) come from the vote ledger 2 instead of vote ledger 1, and ledger 2 can be altered so it may or may not match ledger 1. Now, think of it like this: You want the report to add up only the actual votes. But, unbeknownst to the election supervisor, votes can be added and subtracted from vote ledger 2. Official reports come from vote ledger 2, which has been disengaged from vote ledger 1. If one asks for a detailed report for some precincts, though, the report comes from vote ledger 1. Therefore, if you keep the correct votes in vote ledger 1, a spot check of detailed precincts (even if you compare voter-verified paper ballots) will always be correct.” Auditing
 
pjmret said:
Mr. Ramsland claims that on “November 21, 2020, an unauthorized user
unsuccessfully attempted to zero out election results” (¶B.17). The only evidence
he offers for this assertion is an EMS log file entry that reads “EmsLogger - There
is no permission to {0}”, which he claims “is direct proof of an attempt to tamper
with evidence” (¶J.8). This is absurd and misleading. A programmer would
immediately recognize that {0} is merely a placeholder, in this case one that was
intended to be replaced with a description of the attempted action [26]. It has
nothing to do with “zeroing” election results.
Citing another error message logged to the EMS, “XmlException: The ’ ’
character, hexadecimal value 0x20, cannot be included in a name”, Mr. Ramsland
concludes, “Bottom line is that this is a calibration that rejects the vote” (¶J.8).
This is completely baseless. The error refers to a field name in a data structure
(an XML entity), which the relevant programming standard does not allow to
contain a space. It has no relation to the names of contests or candidates, and
there is nothing that suggests the error resulted in a rejected vote.


Ramsland is a ***** who made up lies to justify his fee
In other words a typical republican
Click to expand...
Democrats deny the details of the report but they do not come close to irrefutably proving the various details of the report are false.
 
mark francis said:
Democrats deny the details of the report but they do not come close to irrefutably proving the various details of the report are false.
Click to expand...
actually the report I keep posting did irrefutable prove it was false.

he's a ***** who can't get states right. lol
 
mark francis said:
Not true. Machine tampering has been perfected so that the fraudulent results are covered by altering the logs to make them match published counts that are themselves fraudulent.

Cracking Dominion’s Source Code — A National Security Threat Since 2003 (substack.com)

The contents of these files amounted to a virtual handbook for vote-tampering: They contained diagrams of remote communications setups, passwords, encryption keys, source code, user manuals, testing protocols, and simulators, as well as files loaded with votes and voting machine software. Diebold Elections Systems AccuVote systems use software called “GEMS,” and this system is used in 37 states. The voting system works like this: Voters vote at the precinct, running their ballot through an optical scan, or entering their vote on a touch screen. After the polls close, poll workers transmit the votes that have been accumulated to the county office. They do this by modem. At the county office, there is a “host computer” with a program on it called GEMS. GEMS receives the incoming votes and stores them in a vote ledger.

But in the files we examined, which were created by Diebold employees and/or county officials, we learned that the Diebold program used another set of books with a copy of what is in vote ledger 1. And at the same time, it made yet a third vote ledger with another copy. Apparently, the Elections Supervisor never sees these three sets of books. All she sees is the reports she can run: Election summary (totals, county wide) or a detail report (totals for each precinct). She has no way of knowing that her GEMS program is using multiple sets of books, because the GEMS interface draws its data from an Access database, which is hidden.

And here is what is quite odd: On the programs we tested, the Election summary (totals, county wide) come from the vote ledger 2 instead of vote ledger 1, and ledger 2 can be altered so it may or may not match ledger 1. Now, think of it like this: You want the report to add up only the actual votes. But, unbeknownst to the election supervisor, votes can be added and subtracted from vote ledger 2. Official reports come from vote ledger 2, which has been disengaged from vote ledger 1. If one asks for a detailed report for some precincts, though, the report comes from vote ledger 1. Therefore, if you keep the correct votes in vote ledger 1, a spot check of detailed precincts (even if you compare voter-verified paper ballots) will always be correct.” Auditing
Click to expand...

prove that the hand counts weren't accurate in the 2020 election *****. lol
 
mark francis said:
www.rasmussenreports.com

Election Integrity: Most Voters Still Suspect Cheating

Protecting the integrity of elections remains a high priority for American voters, most of whom still suspect there was cheating in the 2020 presidential election.
www.rasmussenreports.com www.rasmussenreports.com

Election Integrity: Most Voters Still Suspect Cheating​

Wednesday, May 25, 2022

Protecting the integrity of elections remains a high priority for American voters, most of whom still suspect there was cheating in the 2020 presidential election.
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 55% of Likely U.S. voters believe cheating likely affected the outcome of the 2020 presidential election, including 39% who think it’s Very Likely. Thirty-nine percent (39%) don’t think cheating affected the 2020 election, including 28% who say it’s Not At All Likely. These findings are almost identical to results in March. (To see survey question wording, click here.)
Click to expand...

a lot of people suspect the republicans of cheating too. its sad.

but of course it doesn't matter how many people "suspect' it, you morons haven't proven it.
 
mark francis said:
The reason that practicably nobody has uncovered fraud in Dominion machines is because Dominion has been successful in preventing nearly every effort to examine the security logs of their machines.

Cracking Dominion’s Source Code — A National Security Threat Since 2003 (substack.com)

The problem found with Microsoft components (DWG) is the use of dynamic coding which can be used to change ballot results. From the beginning (1997), Bob Urosevich and Barry Herron insisted this was not subject to a source code audit.

The same Microsoft ACCESS program is shown above to swiftly and undetectably change the audit trail and results is what Diebold/ES&S and Diebold/Dominion demand protection for.

When Diebold (using Dominion’s current source code) was audited by Metamor for the FEC/NASED, they found the security of GEMS and the integrity of the audit trails were compromised because Microsoft Access can easily change that audit trail.
Click to expand...

not "practically no one", but "no one" *****. lol.

given that hand counts equal machine ballots, there is a reason no one has proven fraud. lol
 
mark francis said:
A Dominion official was reported by a whistleblower to have stated Dominion was not going to allow Trump to win. Dominion likely played a key role in stealing the election for the lackluster Biden and have been successful in preventing all but a few investigations into the inner workings of their machines by claiming the info is legally protected from examination by propriety laws.

US Election – vote ‘adjudication’ explained: it’s a rort | Pursue Democracy

All six swing states still in dispute—Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, in addition to Georgia, Nevada, and Arizona—were won by Trump as of midnight on Election Day, and all experienced a massive “blue-shift” in the early morning hours of Nov. 4.

Now we learn, thanks to the court-ordered forensic audit of the Dominion servers in Antrim County, Michigan, that the Dominion software somehow experienced an astounding 68.05 percent error rate in electronic tabulation log events (pdf).

“We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.”-
Joe Biden *

The Election Assistance Commission (originally the Federal Election Commission) allows a maximum error rate of just 0.0008 percent (pdf). That is, the 68.05 percent audited error rate for Dominion software in Antrim County is a staggering 85,000 times the allowable error rate.

The forensic report understandably concluded that Dominion software was “intentionally designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results.”
Click to expand...

yes, mail in ballots went massively democratic because dems weren't stupid enough to vote in person when they had an alternative.

what part of that are you too stupid to understand/ lol
 
mark francis said:
A Dominion official was reported by a whistleblower to have stated Dominion was not going to allow Trump to win. Dominion likely played a key role in stealing the election for the lackluster Biden and have been successful in preventing all but a few investigations into the inner workings of their machines by claiming the info is legally protected from examination by propriety laws.

US Election – vote ‘adjudication’ explained: it’s a rort | Pursue Democracy

All six swing states still in dispute—Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, in addition to Georgia, Nevada, and Arizona—were won by Trump as of midnight on Election Day, and all experienced a massive “blue-shift” in the early morning hours of Nov. 4.

Now we learn, thanks to the court-ordered forensic audit of the Dominion servers in Antrim County, Michigan, that the Dominion software somehow experienced an astounding 68.05 percent error rate in electronic tabulation log events (pdf).

“We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.”-
Joe Biden *

The Election Assistance Commission (originally the Federal Election Commission) allows a maximum error rate of just 0.0008 percent (pdf). That is, the 68.05 percent audited error rate for Dominion software in Antrim County is a staggering 85,000 times the allowable error rate.

The forensic report understandably concluded that Dominion software was “intentionally designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results.”
Click to expand...


yes..to fight fraud, *****. lol
 
Werbung:
mark francis said:
A Dominion official was reported by a whistleblower to have stated Dominion was not going to allow Trump to win. Dominion likely played a key role in stealing the election for the lackluster Biden and have been successful in preventing all but a few investigations into the inner workings of their machines by claiming the info is legally protected from examination by propriety laws.

US Election – vote ‘adjudication’ explained: it’s a rort | Pursue Democracy

All six swing states still in dispute—Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, in addition to Georgia, Nevada, and Arizona—were won by Trump as of midnight on Election Day, and all experienced a massive “blue-shift” in the early morning hours of Nov. 4.

Now we learn, thanks to the court-ordered forensic audit of the Dominion servers in Antrim County, Michigan, that the Dominion software somehow experienced an astounding 68.05 percent error rate in electronic tabulation log events (pdf).

“We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.”-
Joe Biden *

The Election Assistance Commission (originally the Federal Election Commission) allows a maximum error rate of just 0.0008 percent (pdf). That is, the 68.05 percent audited error rate for Dominion software in Antrim County is a staggering 85,000 times the allowable error rate.

The forensic report understandably concluded that Dominion software was “intentionally designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results.”
Click to expand...

even michigan republicans thought ramsland was a *****, they discarded his whole report. lol

“As chair of the Senate Oversight Committee, I made it clear from the start that the investigation into the November 2020 General Election would be taken with a firm commitment to truth and a goal of reassuring the citizens of this state that their votes counted,” said McBroom, R-Waucedah Township. “People are, understandably, confused by recent changes to election laws, as well as by practices, orders and determinations made by state and local governments in response to the pandemic. They are right to demand answers and deserve nothing less than the truth amidst so much shouting and misrepresentation from both sides of the political spectrum.

“This investigation was lengthy, thorough, and revealing. We found both real vulnerabilities and resiliency within the state’s elections system. We also discovered the extent to which our elections officials go to facilitate them. The committee’s report goes into considerable detail on many of these issues, and I hope the public is reassured by the security and protections already in place, motivated to support necessary reforms to make it better, and grateful for our fellow citizens who do the hard work of conducting our elections.

“After innumerable hours over many months, watching, listening, and reading both in-person testimony and various other accounts, I am confident in asserting that the results of the November 2020 General Election in Michigan were accurately represented by the certified and audited results. However, if genuine issues arise from continued investigation, I will not hesitate to ask the committee to consider recommending an audit or amending this report in the future.


you're so stupid. lol
 

Similar threads

K
Vegas Employer: Obama Won, So I Fired 22 Employees
2
Replies
24
Views
2K
pjmret
P
Pandora
    • Like
Joe Biden gave a "creepy" speech over the weekend
2 3 4
Replies
57
Views
11K
mark francis
M
Little-Acorn
Layoffs beginning, now that employers know Obamacare taxes won't be cancelled
3 4 5
Replies
69
Views
9K
pjmret
P
steveox
FOX News made a big mistake by firing Glenn Beck
Replies
12
Views
2K
Openmind
Openmind
B
Obama tells Hispanic voters to 'punish' enemies
Replies
0
Views
1K
bododie
B
Back
Top