the annoying thing
Well-Known Member
well your free to answer it if you like .
-
Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum
What has lying biden built back better ?
- Thread starter the annoying thing
- Start date
Werbung:
the annoying thing
Well-Known Member
but what has he built back better ? give examples of what he has built .
i just gave examples of things he's improved. try reading next time.
or do you think he meant he was personally going to build a road or something? lol
New Projects from Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill are Announced
These new projects will modernize transportation, make it more affordable, increase safety, and strengthen supply chains
www.roadsbridges.com
New Projects from Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill are Announced
Aug. 11, 2022These new projects will modernize transportation, make it more affordable, increase safety, and strengthen supply chains
6 months in, President Biden's infrastructure plan has 4,300 projects
President Biden signed the bipartisan infrastructure measure into law in November.
www.cbsnews.com
some examples for those who lack googling skills
the annoying thing
Well-Known Member
but are they betterNew Projects from Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill are Announced
These new projects will modernize transportation, make it more affordable, increase safety, and strengthen supply chains
New Projects from Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill are Announced
Aug. 11, 2022
These new projects will modernize transportation, make it more affordable, increase safety, and strengthen supply chains
6 months in, President Biden's infrastructure plan has 4,300 projects
President Biden signed the bipartisan infrastructure measure into law in November.
some examples for those who lack googling skills
generally improving infrastructure is better than not improving it.
unless you hate america.
Rep. Kay Granger (R-Texas) last year left little doubt why she was voting against a $1-trillion bipartisan infrastructure measure, calling it nothing more than a “socialist plan full of crushing taxes and radical spending.”
Yet, when the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers announced on Wednesday that very same infrastructure bill would be funding a $403-million flood control project in her district in the Fort Worth area, Granger wasted no time in hailing the effort.
“This is a great day for Fort Worth,” she said in a statement. She did not mention where the Army Corps was getting the money but thanked the agency for its “hard work and tireless commitment” to making her community safer.
the bill is so good that even republicans who voted against it now claim credit for it. lol
Yet, when the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers announced on Wednesday that very same infrastructure bill would be funding a $403-million flood control project in her district in the Fort Worth area, Granger wasted no time in hailing the effort.
“This is a great day for Fort Worth,” she said in a statement. She did not mention where the Army Corps was getting the money but thanked the agency for its “hard work and tireless commitment” to making her community safer.
the bill is so good that even republicans who voted against it now claim credit for it. lol
Granger is not the only Republican cheering on projects generated by a bill that she voted to kill. In recent days, at least four other Republican members of Congress have praised initiatives made possible by the infrastructure law they opposed. Political analysts say they are not likely to be the last.
“Infrastructure remains a relatively nonpartisan issue, so even though those lawmakers may have not voted for the bill, they still have to answer to their constituents, and they want to align themselves with things that are popular,” said Cynthia Peacock, a professor of political communications at the University of Alabama.
“Infrastructure remains a relatively nonpartisan issue, so even though those lawmakers may have not voted for the bill, they still have to answer to their constituents, and they want to align themselves with things that are popular,” said Cynthia Peacock, a professor of political communications at the University of Alabama.
After he voted against the infrastructure package in November, Gonzales blasted the measure, saying that it "will only lead to more spending for the Democrats and this flailing administration" and that "the Democrat path to trillions more in spending will only make matters worse and hold our country back."
Asked about how this week's remarks contrast with his earlier rhetoric, a Gonzales spokesperson said the congressman, alongside other members in neighboring districts, advocated for funding to be directed to this project after the bill had passed the House
"While Congressman Gonzales did not vote for the initial package due to the $1 trillion price tag associated with it, if the money is going to be spent, he is going to advocate that it goes to the district," the spokesperson said.
Asked about how this week's remarks contrast with his earlier rhetoric, a Gonzales spokesperson said the congressman, alongside other members in neighboring districts, advocated for funding to be directed to this project after the bill had passed the House
"While Congressman Gonzales did not vote for the initial package due to the $1 trillion price tag associated with it, if the money is going to be spent, he is going to advocate that it goes to the district," the spokesperson said.
ven top Republicans in the House are promoting parts of the infrastructure package that they opposed. In a news release last week, Steve Scalise of Louisiana, the second-ranking House Republican, highlighted flood mitigation measures that will get funding under the new law.
A spokesperson said Scalise had long supported the flood protection projects and had backed previous legislation that provided funding for them. "What he did not support is tying necessary infrastructure needs to unrelated, Green New Deal policies Democrats put in their $1.2 trillion dollar bill," the spokesperson said in an email statement.
Rep. Clay Higgins, R-La., also promoted funding for waterways in his district last week. "While I opposed the infrastructure bill in its totality based on unwavering principle, there are certain elements within the bill that my office fully supports," he said in a statement.
A spokesperson said Scalise had long supported the flood protection projects and had backed previous legislation that provided funding for them. "What he did not support is tying necessary infrastructure needs to unrelated, Green New Deal policies Democrats put in their $1.2 trillion dollar bill," the spokesperson said in an email statement.
Rep. Clay Higgins, R-La., also promoted funding for waterways in his district last week. "While I opposed the infrastructure bill in its totality based on unwavering principle, there are certain elements within the bill that my office fully supports," he said in a statement.
the annoying thing
Well-Known Member
hes done a great job with our immigration problem crime and inflation plus spending and taxes
we're talking infrastructure here. try to keep up.
the annoying thing
Well-Known Member
We are isnt the southern border infrastructure ? And energy
Werbung:
they aren't working on energy?
and you guys are so obsessed with the border. lol