The Meaning of Liberal

The real difference between liberals and conservatives is that liberals are those that are too liberal for their own good; while conservatives are those that are only liberal for their own good. Either way you want to look at it, neither come out looking very good.

Much like a lot of things in life going to far in either direction can create unfairness. It's a shame things have become so polarized.

It seems to me it used to be more that the hardball competition took place mainly during the elections and then afterward people sort of settled down to see what the elected officials could do with at least a little bit of working together.

We'd get a lot more done a lot quicker if that were still the case.
 
Werbung:
The real difference between liberals and conservatives is that liberals are those that are too liberal for their own good; while conservatives are those that are only liberal for their own good.
Ah, yes....more o' those "conservative" Absolutes!!

How helpful.....

:rolleyes:
 
A few more insightful traits held by many kooky DF liberals...

I believe the First Amendment does not apply to conservatives - it is exclusive to liberals and progressives.
I believe the Second Amendment is not an individual right.
I believe people who believe in God are mindless fools, but I know man made global warming is going to kill us all.
I believe big and bigger government is good.
I believe private property rights should be eliminated.
I believe we must protect Muslim Americans.
I believe Christian Americans need to be...silenced.
I believe abortion is good because it limits thee number of undesirable people.
I believe alternative energy is good, just not in my neighborhood.
I believe higher taxes good tax cuts bad.
I believe in animal rights.
I believe African Americans should be wards of the state as long as they vote Democrat.
I believe Ronald Reagan a terrorist and Stalin a great libertarian.
I believe the A-bombs dropped on Japan were racist motivated and not necessary to win the war.
I believe Bush was involved in the WTC attacks, but those birthers are crazy.
Rush Limbaugh is dangerous and should be imprisoned.
Fox News spouts nothing but lies, but MSNBC is very credible.
I believe political correctness and cultural diversity are good and helps to keep the evil white man in his place.
 
LIBERALS - believe in wealth redistribution with other people's money.
-The liberal politcians as in Obama's staff don't even pay their taxes unless they are caught. They generally are cheapskates when it comes to charity, using their own money.

Al Gore gave ~ $150 total to charity one year before he ran for president. He 's a typical liberal in that respect.

Obama had a brother living on $12/month and Obama never sent him a dime! That's liberal by definition!
 
LIBERALS - believe in wealth redistribution with other people's money.
-The liberal politcians as in Obama's staff don't even pay their taxes unless they are caught. They generally are cheapskates when it comes to charity, using their own money.

Al Gore gave ~ $150 total to charity one year before he ran for president. He 's a typical liberal in that respect.

Obama had a brother living on $12/month and Obama never sent him a dime! That's liberal by definition!

Dont forget obamas aunt who is here illegally and lives in the slums of boston
 
Dont forget obamas aunt who is here illegally and lives in the slums of boston

you say you want less insults and stuff on the site...but then look at what you post? All its deserving of is a insult at you. really that's all this whole thread is worth...its not like its a ...its not a lets debate thread...You want to know why there are more insults now? read this pointless thread.
 
you say you want less insults and stuff on the site...but then look at what you post? All its deserving of is a insult at you. really that's all this whole thread is worth...its not like its a ...its not a lets debate thread...You want to know why there are more insults now? read this pointless thread.

You do not see a difference in talking about a politician and a fellow poster?

Really?

not to mention what I said is true. He does have an aunt who is here illegally and did live in the slums of boston. I think someone moved her since. (thankfully)

My saying obama is a moron and my saying you are a moron are two totally differnt things. I dont see how you dont get that

I am sure its ok with the rules to insult political people, if not all the Sarah Palin threads would not exist now would they
 
You do not see a difference in talking about a politician and a fellow poster?

Really?

not to mention what I said is true. He does have an aunt who is here illegally and did live in the slums of boston. I think someone moved her since. (thankfully)

My saying obama is a moron and my saying you are a moron are two totally differnt things. I dont see how you dont get that

I am sure its ok with the rules to insult political people, if not all the Sarah Palin threads would not exist now would they

yes but if you want to try to say Obama is a Moron because of his aunt...then only thing I can say is, you are in fact the moron...(note this was stated to show a point, not a statement of calling you a moron..I don't want any more points here) because there is no issue to debate...its just a dumb statement. If you look at half of Always Rants...they are not asking about policy or debate, they are in fact just mindless rants...and no amount of facts will do anything to change always's mind so if you have dumb ideas yelled out, and someone who does not listen to facts...leaves you little else...hence why I actually had to pug Always on Iggy, because the mindless posts drove me up the wall, with the lack of facts and even point to half of them. yet I was suppose to just sit and say nothing. You notice I never have said a bad thing to Big rob? why because he actuly debates...even though we don't often agree, he actually debates and uses facts and logic..
 
yes but if you want to try to say Obama is a Moron because of his aunt...then only thing I can say is, you are in fact the moron...(note this was stated to show a point, not a statement of calling you a moron..I don't want any more points here) because there is no issue to debate...its just a dumb statement. If you look at half of Always Rants...they are not asking about policy or debate, they are in fact just mindless rants...and no amount of facts will do anything to change always's mind so if you have dumb ideas yelled out, and someone who does not listen to facts...leaves you little else...hence why I actually had to pug Always on Iggy, because the mindless posts drove me up the wall, with the lack of facts and even point to half of them. yet I was suppose to just sit and say nothing. You notice I never have said a bad thing to Big rob? why because he actuly debates...even though we don't often agree, he actually debates and uses facts and logic..

I was not calling obama a moron because of his aunt

I was using his name as an example that its ok if I call obama a moron over his aunt or over his stand on abortion or over his ideas on taxes or what ever... but its not ok for me to call you a moron even if I dont like what you post or how you post it.

So back to what you said in the first post on this topic


yes I think its ok for me to make a slap at obama and still want civil chats in the forum between you and I or anyone and myself.
 
I was not calling obama a moron because of his aunt

I was using his name as an example that its ok if I call obama a moron over his aunt or over his stand on abortion or over his ideas on taxes or what ever... but its not ok for me to call you a moron even if I dont like what you post or how you post it.

So back to what you said in the first post on this topic


yes I think its ok for me to make a slap at obama and still want civil chats in the forum between you and I or anyone and myself.

If you just want to insult Obama, then that tells me you don't want to debate facts...Thus I will deal with the post in that manor. If you post a legit question or attack on policy, and actuly wish to debate policy, and listen, I will post facts and issues..for example when you posted about Afganistan, and showed you actuly where willing to listen...I presented a strait forward rundown of why I did not agree...if someone posts stuff saying Obama is like Hitler or Stalin...and that crap...I see no point to debate.and will tell them what I think of them. Its that simple
 
If you just want to insult Obama, then that tells me you don't want to debate facts...Thus I will deal with the post in that manor. If you post a legit question or attack on policy, and actuly wish to debate policy, and listen, I will post facts and issues..for example when you posted about Afganistan, and showed you actuly where willing to listen...I presented a strait forward rundown of why I did not agree...if someone posts stuff saying Obama is like Hitler or Stalin...and that crap...I see no point to debate.and will tell them what I think of them. Its that simple

Sure I want to debate the facts but if anyone dares to bring up the actual facts they are racist haters, so how can you debate something if you cant even bring it up?


A long time ago when he was first elected and talking about being his brothers keeper and how he was going to fix health care for all and taxes and jobs and all that good stuff. I and others brought up the fact he has a brother living in a fraking hut with no toilet and an aunt living in the slums of Boston, if he isnt helping them why on earth do we think he will help us.

we were all called haters, racist and liars and the topic was ignored.


He says we all need skin in the game, we all have to spread the wealth and give up some of our pie, but he himself gave nothing to charity til the year he decided to run for president and that was 20k to his church of hate. Typical Americans gave far more of a percent of their incomes than he did but he wants us to give more of our pie.

To bring that up makes us racist haters who just have sour grapes.

people have tried to talk about the issues, using real life examples and they get shot down for doing so.

If we can not talk about the facts of real life things like the above what exactly is there to talk about. You want others to debate with one hand tied behind their backs?
 
Death of liberalism is near, and its harbinger is not a conservative onslaught, nor a new Contract With America. Its demise is being signaled by activities in a small town in Oregon, noteworthy only for a rambunctious annual Shakespearean Festival.
Soon liberal thought pushed well past the novel concepts of civil rights, sexual equality, and governmental support of the poor, to free love, sexual freedom, feminism, abortion rights, and exaggerated forms of freedom of expression, including; burning the flag, urinating and defecating on religious symbols, vulgarity in art and music, tolerance of all manner and combination of sexual encounters, right to self-euthanize, and the consumption of all manner of mind bending drugs, among others. Liberalism is now best defined by its extremists. Much like Spinal Tap, liberals are not content to have the volume up to 10; they have a need to continually go to 11, and beyond. No idea is off the table. No idea is too extreme. Just keep turning the volume knob to the right, 12, 13, maybe. Bose eat your heart out.
And therein is the clue, liberalism has accelerated far past its defensible positions on many issues, and in-fighting is the inevitable result. Late term abortions, Government funded abortions, lack of fiscal restraint, the Afghanistan surge, Gitmo, Iraq, as well as nudity in Ashland, are all pitting moderate liberals against the liberal extremists, and the results will be near-term collapse of the liberal movement as we know it.

Could 2010 be the end of Liberalism? God I sure hope so!!!! Maybe it will burn out like so many red diaper doper babies... GREAT ARTICLE
 
Could 2010 be the end of Liberalism? God I sure hope so!!!! Maybe it will burn out like so many red diaper doper babies... GREAT ARTICLE

Don't hold your breath. We'll be sure to remind people about your platform.:cool:

Things Conservatives Believe

Being a drug addict is a moral failing and a crime, unless you're a conservative radio host. Then it's an illness and you need our prayers for your recovery.

The United States should get out of the United Nations, and our highest national priority is enforcing U.N. resolutions against Iraq.

Government should relax regulation of Big Business and Big Money but crack down on individuals who use marijuana to relieve the pain of illness.

"Standing Tall for America" means firing your workers and moving their jobs to India.

A woman can't be trusted with decisions about her own body, but multi-national corporations can make decisions affecting all mankind without regulation.

Jesus loves you, and shares your hatred of homosexuals and Hillary Clinton.

The best way to improve military morale is to praise the troops in speeches while slashing veterans' benefits and combat pay.

Group sex and drug use are degenerate sins unless you someday run for governor of California as a Republican.

If condoms are kept out of schools, adolescents won't have sex.

A good way to fight terrorism is to belittle our long-time allies, then demand their cooperation and money.

HMOs and insurance companies have the interest of the public at heart.

Providing health care to all Iraqis is sound policy. Providing health care to all Americans is socialism.

Global warming and tobacco's link to cancer are junk science, but creationism should be taught in schools.

Saddam was a good guy when Reagan armed him, a bad guy when Bush's daddy made war on him, a good guy when Cheney did business with him and a bad guy when Bush needed a "we can't find Bin Laden" diversion.

A president lying about an extramarital affair is an impeachable offense. A president lying to enlist support for a war in which thousands die is solid defense policy.

Government should limit itself to the powers named in the Constitution, which include banning gay marriages and censoring the Internet.

The public has a right to know about Hillary's cattle trades, but George Bush's driving record is none of our business.

You support states' rights, which means Attorney General John Ashcroft can tell states what local voter initiatives they have a right to adopt.

What Bill Clinton did in the 1960s is of vital national interest, but what Bush did in the '80s is irrelevant.

Trade with Cuba is wrong because the country is communist, but trade with China and Vietnam is vital to a spirit of international harmony.


BONUS FOOTAGE: Iraq vs. Vietnam

Q. What's the difference between the Vietnam War and the Iraq War?

A. George W. Bush had a plan to get out of the Vietnam War.
 
Werbung:
And more liberalism...

PHOENIX - As Arizona Governor, Janet Napolitano submitted numerous invoices to the federal government for the cost of incarcerating criminal aliens under the State Criminal Alien Assistance Plan (SCAAP) from FY1994 to FY2008. Today State Treasurer Dean Martin announced that he is now pursuing those same claims with now Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano.

"The cost of illegal immigration has exhausted the Arizona State Treasury. In order to pay for the federal government's responsibility of securing our national borders and incarcerating individuals who enter the United States illegally and commit crimes, the state has incurred hundreds of millions of dollars of debt to pay these bills," said Treasurer Dean Martin.

http://www.kvoa.com/news/arizona-taxpayers-owed-1-billion-from-illegal-immigration/
 
Back
Top